San Jose Bills Fan Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 As far as I'm concerned, they'd be letting the best guard in the game slip through their fingers. Sure, it's a more fungible position than most, but this would be a mistake. Isn't that what farm teams do? Hit fungos? I think big league teams do that too. Nix should have worked this contract and Bryd's before the season ended. Typical. Part of the problem in my mind is that it sounds like Buddy hasn't bothered to have any serious talks with his agent yet. It's a sign of disrespect to a player to be forced to play out the last year of his contract unless injuries were a significant factor. Pretty sure Nix did according to reports. You can't hold a gun to someone's head and force them to sign though. Especially when they're gonna have a poke at the open market.
RuntheDamnBall Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 So pay him what he's worth. It's that simple, if he's telling the truth about wanting to stay and it's not just PR posturing.
nucci Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I would franchise Levitre before Byrd .. which means we won't do it and he will leave --- talk about a massive hole in the center of the line. If Andy was a Steeler or a Patriot he wouild be in the Pro Bowl BTW. He is an excellent player. Nix should have worked this contract and Bryd's before the season ended. Typical. What if both players did not want to sign and wait until FA starts? Plus there were reports that talks were going on with both players Guessing you didn't think of that.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 In fact, the only guys they've let walk without a fight were Whitner and Poz. Clearly, they wanted to move in another direction, since they didn't even make an offer. Let's see what happens with Levitre, but my guess is that both he and Byrd are re-signed. And they tried signing Whitner during the season and Poz after the season. Whitner ended up signing for less than the Bills offered him. Poz took a very similar offer to move on.
thebandit27 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I would franchise Levitre before Byrd .. which means we won't do it and he will leave --- talk about a massive hole in the center of the line. If Andy was a Steeler or a Patriot he wouild be in the Pro Bowl BTW. He is an excellent player. Nix should have worked this contract and Bryd's before the season ended. Typical. Care to explain why you feel this is "typical"?
FLFan Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Someone please show me when Nix/Whaley have failed to re-sign a FA that they wanted to keep. Until then, I have a few examples of pending UFAs for you to consider: Kyle Williams Erik Pears Stevie Johnson Fred Jackson Scott Chandler Kraig Urbik Fitzpatrick George Wilson Now, you may not agree that they should've paid the above, and that's fine. However, it's folly to say that they don't re-sign their own when they want to. In fact, the only guys they've let walk without a fight were Whitner and Poz. Clearly, they wanted to move in another direction, since they didn't even make an offer. Let's see what happens with Levitre, but my guess is that both he and Byrd are re-signed. You are right on with this post, except the Bills did make offers to both Whitner and Poz, and according to reports at the time, the offers were very comparable to what they eventually received. Both wanted to leave.
Fixxxer Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I would like the new HC to decide if Levitre will be functional with the offense he wants to run. Byrd thrived in zone and though not perfect in man to man coverage he can adapt to any system.
MarkyMannn Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 (edited) I'd rather they keep both Byrd & Levitre. This. Levitre is waiting to see what the offers are, while MAYBE he wants to stay here, he wants the Bills to at least match the best offer. Then again, if for example it was Green Bay or the Patriots, I would run if I was him. To me what makes him especially valuable is he NEVER misses time. Compare that to our signing of Mark Anderson and his impact this year Edited December 31, 2012 by MarkyMannn
thebandit27 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 And they tried signing Whitner during the season and Poz after the season. Whitner ended up signing for less than the Bills offered him. Poz took a very similar offer to move on. I remembered that they had talks with Whitner, but thought he was in a different ball park, so no formal offer was made...could be wrong though. I didn't remember Poz getting an offer at all...I must've missed that.
RuntheDamnBall Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I think the big problem right now is the uncertainty around the coaching situation... Levitre probably won't re-sign as long as that looms. But there is time. Most likely he fields offers from other teams first, though. I don't see him getting wrapped up before that.
thebandit27 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 You are right on with this post, except the Bills did make offers to both Whitner and Poz, and according to reports at the time, the offers were very comparable to what they eventually received. Both wanted to leave. Well, two of you can't be wrong. I must've completely missed the Poz offer, because I honestly don't remember that at all and couldn't find it on the interwebs.
stony Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I remembered that they had talks with Whitner, but thought he was in a different ball park, so no formal offer was made...could be wrong though. I didn't remember Poz getting an offer at all...I must've missed that. Right about Donte. Poz's was similar, but he wanted 43 while we were still entertaining the 34.
apuszczalowski Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Well, two of you can't be wrong. I must've completely missed the Poz offer, because I honestly don't remember that at all and couldn't find it on the interwebs. Whitner was offered a deal, or atleast they discussed it, but Whitner thought he was worth more and basically burned a bridge with Nix and shot them down, only to get less then he thought he was worth. Poz I think they also talked to, but he felt he was better suited to play in the 4-3 and did not want to play in a 3-4 so he said he was going to find a 4-3 team to play for. I think the big problem right now is the uncertainty around the coaching situation... Levitre probably won't re-sign as long as that looms. But there is time. Most likely he fields offers from other teams first, though. I don't see him getting wrapped up before that. Well, they have until almost mid March to clear everything up in the front office and work out a deal with levitre before other teams can even express interest in signing with him. it sounds like he wants a top dollar dear and isn't going to take a discount to stay
Bob in STL Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 What if both players did not want to sign and wait until FA starts? Plus there were reports that talks were going on with both players Guessing you didn't think of that. Of course I considered that. It's Buddy Nix's job to get this done. Signing one of the two during the season would allow us to franchise the other. Sure it is possible they both want out. It is even very probable that another team will offer them more money. You happy with that? I am not. Is that what Nix is paid to do? I expect him to keep our good players on the roster.
RuntheDamnBall Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Whitner was offered a deal, or atleast they discussed it, but Whitner thought he was worth more and basically burned a bridge with Nix and shot them down, only to get less then he thought he was worth. Poz I think they also talked to, but he felt he was better suited to play in the 4-3 and did not want to play in a 3-4 so he said he was going to find a 4-3 team to play for. Well, they have until almost mid March to clear everything up in the front office and work out a deal with levitre before other teams can even express interest in signing with him. it sounds like he wants a top dollar dear and isn't going to take a discount to stay There is no reason not to give it to him. He has been the picture of health, a good soldier, with borderline All Pro level play, and he can play other positions in a pinch. And he does not have to learn and adjust with a new cast of OL teammates. Continuity IS important in this case.
symbiant Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 After all he's/we've been through, he most likely looking for change. Unless he's franchised, he's probably gone. We gotta sign Byrd fast then franchise him if the numbers make sense
Mr_Blizzard Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 It would be good for Andy, but bad for the Bills if he leaves. He has been a solid player, and for the first time in years, people can say that the Bills have a decent offensive line. Levitre is a key part of that O-line.
Best Player Available Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 As far as I'm concerned, they'd be letting the best guard in the game slip through their fingers. Sure, it's a more fungible position than most, but this would be a mistake. Levitre is a good starting left guard. Zero pro bowls, or any league honors would certainly indicate he is far from the best guard in the game though. A good one no doubt.
DDD Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Not sure. WGR reported that when asked how much he'd like to be back in Buffalo on a scale of 1-10, he said "10". That's not a guy chasing top dollar as his sole priority. All the players say they want to be back. When they say this they're as good as gone. The only way he's back with the Bills is if he's franchised. Can't blame the guy. Get the money to support your family and sign with a team that has a chance to win.
RyanC883 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I think they can keep both Byrd and Levitre. I'd rather keep Byrd if I had to pick. Levitre may be easier to replace via the draft, ect. And we still have Wood, Glenn, etc. on the O-line. The seondary has more holes IMO. But I think we'll be able to keep both. This is just posturing and lets see who the new head coach is.
Recommended Posts