Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 531
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

didn't you mean - Certainly, woo, woo, woo, woo, woo!

Naa, I'm not cheering for them to be bad.

 

I just know this years Bills defense can't tackle, are easily fooled, are so vanilla its just sad. Although, watching Fitz try and make a play at the end of the half is sorta comical

Posted

So let me get this straight. Since it was an intent to throw a forward pass even though it didn't go forward? Soooooo all any QB that has the ball slip out of his hand can say it was his intent to throw it forward?

Posted

Anyone keeping track?

 

1) SJ "fumble" - questionable possession

2) SJ "incomplete" - clearly a catch and breaking of the plane

3) Tannehill "fumble" - not even reviewed

4) Dickerson fumble - no possession

5) Tannehill "lateral" - it's a forward pass that went backwards! WTF.

 

Ok, try and tell me that it isn't against us.

Posted

So let me get this straight. Since it was an intent to throw a forward pass even though it didn't go forward? Soooooo all any QB that has the ball slip out of his hand can say it was his intent to throw it forward?

 

Yes just like any QB can tuck the ball to their chest when they see a defender coming just to save a fumble to be call incomplete because of the tuck rule.

Posted

Anyone keeping track?

 

1) SJ "fumble" - questionable possession

2) SJ "incomplete" - clearly a catch and breaking of the plane

3) Tannehill "fumble" - not even reviewed

4) Dickerson fumble - no possession

5) Tannehill "lateral" - it's a forward pass that went backwards! WTF.

 

Ok, try and tell me that it isn't against us.

 

This is one of the worst games I have seen call wise.

Posted

Anyone keeping track?

 

1) SJ "fumble" - questionable possession

2) SJ "incomplete" - clearly a catch and breaking of the plane

3) Tannehill "fumble" - not even reviewed

4) Dickerson fumble - no possession

5) Tannehill "lateral" - it's a forward pass that went backwards! WTF.

 

Ok, try and tell me that it isn't against us.

Posted (edited)

Anyone keeping track?

 

1) SJ "fumble" - questionable possession

2) SJ "incomplete" - clearly a catch and breaking of the plane

3) Tannehill "fumble" - not even reviewed

4) Dickerson fumble - no possession

5) Tannehill "lateral" - it's a forward pass that went backwards! WTF.

 

Ok, try and tell me that it isn't against us.

 

That is reaching it never went backwards it never went forward either but it was by rule incomplete it should of been intentional grounding tho, and I don't blame them for the stevie fumble in the endzone the coach has to challenge that ****. Stevie did fumble the ball on the first one though and not even debatable if ruled a fumble.

Edited by TheOldBill12
×
×
  • Create New...