Jump to content

ESPN QBR = Playoff Predictor


BisonMan

Recommended Posts

For those that don't think the Bills need a new QB to make the playoffs, just look at how ESPN's QBR system rates QBs and how highly that correlates with a team's playoff chances.

 

So far this year, of the 12 QBs with the highest QBR, 10 are on team's that will make the playoffs if they hold to form (i.e. beat teams they will play with lower win %). The two that aren't in the top 12 (Flacco and Cutler) play for teams with elite defenses and still have QBRs better than the median (QBR>50).

 

The same cannot be said of QB Rating where just 8 of the 12 projected playoff teams have QBs in the top 12. Four QBs in the lower half of the QB rating system are on playoff teams (Flacco, Cutler, Luck and Eli Manning). Most interesting is Luck, whose QBR is 6th best in the league but whose QB Rating is 29th. My eye test says Luck is clutch and his QBR bears that out. Fitz...not so much even though his traditional QB rating is higher than Luck's and many others.

 

In fact, Fitz has a QBR of 47.2 (27th) but a rating of 85.1 (17th). Fitz's QBR looks a lot closer to where I'd put him in the league than his QB rating does. It also tells me that the Bills won't make the playoffs until either Fitz gets a lot better and the defense gets a lot better OR the Bills get a new QB.

 

I know it isn't really news to most here that the Bills need a new QB but it's nice to see the math bear out that opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yay. Another thread about how you must have a HOF QB in order to reach the playoffs. It's been what? 2 days?

 

 

Edit: that's sarcasm. Your newer here so I won't be my usual @$$hole self.

Edited by mrags
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will agree that the nfl has ruined the game due to making the sport the most one-position specific of any other prominant pro sport

 

but still fitz isnt the biggest problem here. he was early this season and probably much of the last half last year but he hasnt been recently

 

his rating is pulled down by his early struggles but hes been pretty solid for a while now. good enough to win in this league

 

hes not a strength but hes not a weakness. subpar as elite qbs go but still better than about half the league. good enough with a good team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those that don't think the Bills need a new QB to make the playoffs, just look at how ESPN's QBR system rates QBs and how highly that correlates with a team's playoff chances.

 

So far this year, of the 12 QBs with the highest QBR, 10 are on team's that will make the playoffs if they hold to form (i.e. beat teams they will play with lower win %). The two that aren't in the top 12 (Flacco and Cutler) play for teams with elite defenses and still have QBRs better than the median (QBR>50).

 

The same cannot be said of QB Rating where just 8 of the 12 projected playoff teams have QBs in the top 12. Four QBs in the lower half of the QB rating system are on playoff teams (Flacco, Cutler, Luck and Eli Manning). Most interesting is Luck, whose QBR is 6th best in the league but whose QB Rating is 29th. My eye test says Luck is clutch and his QBR bears that out. Fitz...not so much even though his traditional QB rating is higher than Luck's and many others.

 

In fact, Fitz has a QBR of 47.2 (27th) but a rating of 85.1 (17th). Fitz's QBR looks a lot closer to where I'd put him in the league than his QB rating does. It also tells me that the Bills won't make the playoffs until either Fitz gets a lot better and the defense gets a lot better OR the Bills get a new QB.

 

I know it isn't really news to most here that the Bills need a new QB but it's nice to see the math bear out that opinion.

Excellent post. Interesting about the espn rating.

 

I love how Espn thinks it can just make up its own rating system, as if the regular QB rating isn't good enough.

Um ... maybe it isn't good enough??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Espn thinks it can just make up its own rating system, as if the regular QB rating isn't good enough.

 

I don't have a problem with the Sabermetric movement in sports.

 

I think it's interesting as a science and as a social phenomena.

 

There are lots of very educated people trying to become sports executives via statistical analysis.

 

Billy Beane was a former player but he spawned a movement that has attracted lots of MIT and Ivy League grads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will agree that the nfl has ruined the game due to making the sport the most one-position specific of any other prominant pro sport

 

but still fitz isnt the biggest problem here. he was early this season and probably much of the last half last year but he hasnt been recently

 

his rating is pulled down by his early struggles but hes been pretty solid for a while now. good enough to win in this league

 

hes not a strength but hes not a weakness. subpar as elite qbs go but still better than about half the league. good enough with a good team

 

Being a QB that can rarely ever complete a pass over 10 yards is being a weakness. Believe what you like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I don't have a problem with the Sabermetric movement in sports.

 

I think it's interesting as a science and as a social phenomena.

 

There are lots of very educated people trying to become sports executives via statistical analysis.

 

Billy Beane was a former player but he spawned a movement that has attracted lots of MIT and Ivy League grads.

 

Yeah I concur re sabremetrics. My comment was more born out of dislike for Espn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even worse, Fitz doesn't have one of the highest 50 game QBRs this year. His best game was against KC and ranks 56th among the best games of the year at QB. Fitz has been up and down and down all year. His last three game QBR's are 62.5, 16.3 and 78.6. So, he's never great but sometimes horrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a QB that can rarely ever complete a pass over 10 yards is being a weakness. Believe what you like

Out of all the weeks to critique Fritz's arm, I think this week is the wrong one in light of 4 dropped passes and a 51 yard strike to Graham

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't line QBR, it is developed by statistical gurus in this pass happy non bump coverage era we live in. Wes Welker wouldn't have made it in the 70s, or 80s. That said the QB rating system seemed to work for Steve Young who is the all-time leader.

 

I've read about the QBR & like a Wall Street derivative it overstates the value of one player ideally the QB. If you want a real stat why we suck we've been a bottom 8 defense since Gailey took over in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read about the QBR & like a Wall Street derivative it overstates the value of one player ideally the QB. If you want a real stat why we suck we've been a bottom 8 defense since Gailey took over in 2010.

 

As a previous posted noted, QBR points out all too well that the QB position has become the determining factor for success in teh NFL. Rule changes have almost completely eliminated defense as a factor in which teams make/miss the playoffs. Looking at the top 12 teams in total defense (I pick 12 because 12 teams make the playoffs), only half of them are likely to make the playoffs this year. Basically, it's a coin flip if you have a top defense...but not really.

 

Teams with top defenses not currently in a playoff slot: Arizona, Cincy, San Diego, NY Jets, Dallas and St. Louis. None has a top 12 QBR quarterback.

Teams with top defenses currently in a playoff spot: Pitt, SF, Denver, Seattle, Chicago and Houston. All have quarterbacks with a top 12 QBR.

 

So, defense no longer even gets you a chance to play in the playoffs, let alone "win championships".

 

It's a sad state for the sport in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...