Jump to content

Boehner's office stormed


dayman

Recommended Posts

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/john-boehner-naked-protesters_n_2198887.html

 

At least seven nude protesters stormed House Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office in the Longworth House Office Building on Tuesday, according to reports from Sahil Kapur of Talking Points Memo and others who were there. The group was protesting cuts to HIV/AIDS funding that is possible as part of the fiscal cliff negotiations.

 

r-JOHN-BOEHNER-NAKED-PROTESTERS-large570.jpg?4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh and BTW cuts to AIDS funding doesn't kill, being stupid kills. You get aids in this country from anything other than a tainted blood trasfusion you're pretty much an idiot.

 

Why do you want to interfere with people taking drugs from tainted needles, or sucking some guys dick. Stay out of their bedroom. Your only job is to pay for their treatment (or abortion if a women) when they have bad results. Otherwise it's none of your business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you want to interfere with people taking drugs from tainted needles, or sucking some guys dick. Stay out of their bedroom. Your only job is to pay for their treatment (or abortion if a women) when they have bad results. Otherwise it's none of your business.

 

More entitlements can't fix stupidity....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you want to interfere with people taking drugs from tainted needles, or sucking some guys dick. Stay out of their bedroom. Your only job is to pay for their treatment (or abortion if a women) when they have bad results. Otherwise it's none of your business.

 

Don't forget about paying for their contraceptives. Now stay out of their bodies while you pay for things to stick in their bodies!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a growing segment of the gay community that doesn't see HIV infection as anything other than a managable chronic disease...

 

Private industry makes a pretty penny on retro-virals, why is the Government still funding anything with regards to HIV Infection? If you don't want AIDS, which I assume everybody on this board doesn't wear a condom or not shoot drugs... its pretty easy.

 

Heck, if you want to make an "Investment" as were are calling it these days, put money into Alzheimers research- talk about something that is going to bankrupt the Nation on the healthcare and LTC front... yikes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The demonstration yesterday by AIDS activists in Speaker Boehner's office where they removed their clothes to demonstrate against potential budget cuts to AIDs programs in the fiscal cliff scenario will go down as one of the weirest, most self-indulgent demonstrations in recent memory.

 

 

First of all, their claim that 600,000 people afflicted with AIDS would die if the cuts went through is so over the top, so incredibley, hysterically exaggerated, that the entire purpose of their demonstration was made silly by it.

 

Also silly - and incomprehensible - taking off their clothes. For 30 years we've been told that AIDS is not about sex and now all of a sudden the protestors are stripping to say...what? Republicans don't like sex so that means they hate AIDS patients? George Bush spent more on AIDS research and treating the disease than his three predecessors combined. He did more for treating AIDS in Africa than any president in history.

 

 

 

 

"The reality is that these draconian budget cuts will actually result in the conservative loss of 600,000 people with AIDS' lives around the world," Flynn said moments before being arrested, referring to several federal programs aimed at fighting AIDS here and around the world. "We're talking about killing 600,000 people around the world if we let these budget cuts go into effect. And that's just one year."

 

 

Simple minded nonsense. First of all, the cuts haven't even happened yet, moron. And then there's the matter of "killing 600,000 people." The Washington Blade reported a few weeks ago:

The
that doing nothing about the "fiscal cliff" could result in devastating cuts for HIV/AIDS programs and other federally funded initiatives affecting the LGBT community.
According to
a report from the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee, as many as 12,219 people receiving drugs from ADAP would lose access to medicine.

 

Note they don't say that 12,219 people would die, only that they might lose access to medication.

 

 

This would certainly be a tragedy and would result in their eventual death if they failed to find other funding for their meds, but where in the Wide Wide World of Sports are these protestors getting the number "600,000" dead as a result of budget cuts? I tried googling that number with "fiscal cliff," "AIDS dead," and "fiscal cliff AIDS dead" and could find no reference to that number except in stories about the demonstration in Boehner's office.

 

 

The protestors appear to have pulled the number out of thin air. If someone has a link to a reputable publication that quotes a reputable scientific organization using that number, I'd be happy to include it in an update to this post.

 

 

It appears the protestors got their wish; massive coverage of their ugly, naked bodies. If acting like a freak in a circus side show is the only way to get their point across, they've already lost the battle.

 

http://www.americant...l#ixzz2DXOrKsor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck, if you want to make an "Investment" as were are calling it these days, put money into Alzheimers research- talk about something that is going to bankrupt the Nation on the healthcare and LTC front... yikes

 

Good thing is that we won't know the difference or even remember going off the cliff.

 

Makes covering bith control look pretty smart now, huh?

 

Contraceptives are wrong, the gubment has no business being in a woman's body!

 

We just need to start funding 80th trimester abortions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The demonstration yesterday by AIDS activists in Speaker Boehner's office where they removed their clothes to demonstrate against potential budget cuts to AIDs programs in the fiscal cliff scenario will go down as one of the weirest, most self-indulgent demonstrations in recent memory.

 

 

First of all, their claim that 600,000 people afflicted with AIDS would die if the cuts went through is so over the top, so incredibley, hysterically exaggerated, that the entire purpose of their demonstration was made silly by it.

 

Also silly - and incomprehensible - taking off their clothes. For 30 years we've been told that AIDS is not about sex and now all of a sudden the protestors are stripping to say...what? Republicans don't like sex so that means they hate AIDS patients? George Bush spent more on AIDS research and treating the disease than his three predecessors combined. He did more for treating AIDS in Africa than any president in history.

 

 

 

 

"The reality is that these draconian budget cuts will actually result in the conservative loss of 600,000 people with AIDS' lives around the world," Flynn said moments before being arrested, referring to several federal programs aimed at fighting AIDS here and around the world. "We're talking about killing 600,000 people around the world if we let these budget cuts go into effect. And that's just one year."

 

 

Simple minded nonsense. First of all, the cuts haven't even happened yet, moron. And then there's the matter of "killing 600,000 people." The Washington Blade reported a few weeks ago:

 

The
that doing nothing about the "fiscal cliff" could result in devastating cuts for HIV/AIDS programs and other federally funded initiatives affecting the LGBT community.
According to
a report from the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee, as many as 12,219 people receiving drugs from ADAP would lose access to medicine.

 

Note they don't say that 12,219 people would die, only that they might lose access to medication.

 

 

This would certainly be a tragedy and would result in their eventual death if they failed to find other funding for their meds, but where in the Wide Wide World of Sports are these protestors getting the number "600,000" dead as a result of budget cuts? I tried googling that number with "fiscal cliff," "AIDS dead," and "fiscal cliff AIDS dead" and could find no reference to that number except in stories about the demonstration in Boehner's office.

 

 

The protestors appear to have pulled the number out of thin air. If someone has a link to a reputable publication that quotes a reputable scientific organization using that number, I'd be happy to include it in an update to this post.

 

 

It appears the protestors got their wish; massive coverage of their ugly, naked bodies. If acting like a freak in a circus side show is the only way to get their point across, they've already lost the battle.

 

http://www.americant...l#ixzz2DXOrKsor

 

 

This is admittedly off topic ... BUT ... W did do a number of things for AIDS research and prevention and he should be lauded for that. However, it's interesting to contrast his actions to his father's inactions regarding this health crisis during his presidency.

 

W managed to do the two things his father failed to do: kill Saddam and take a responsible approach to a national health epidemic.

 

Doesn't mean anything of course, just an interesting historical footnote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...