Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't know if I will ever get over the poor sportsmanship that lead to the Colts losing enough games last year in order to draft Luck and not have to sell their souls in the form of draft picks to get him.

 

Regardless... I can't believe that nothing has been made of an illegal hit to Luck's chin during the Pats game. It was such a blatant foul, and it was replayed several times.

 

The Pats* defender got pressure on Luck. He got the ball away. The defender then leaves his feet, and hits Luck in the Chin with his helmet.... no flag.

 

Not only was there no flag, but the announcers in the booth talked right past it with each replay, not even acknowledging the blatant foul. Furthermore, I haven't been able to find any video to link to.

 

This REALLY irks me, and I will say again, I really dislike the Colts organization.

 

Did anyone else catch that, or have a link to the hit in question?

Posted

I wasn't paying attention but my wife went nuts. I think I was on the phone with one of the kids. When I finished I asked about a flag and she said nope. Maybe it's the refs way of showing him he has to earn it. (that's complete BS by the way) The double standard in the league is troublesome.

Posted
0:) NE, NYJ, PIT, DAL. 0:) <-- These teams can do no wrong. Ed Reed got crucified this weekend, and it came immediately. Guys like Spikes and Landry get a slap on the wrist. Oh well.
Posted

Luck definitely earned a bit of repsect from me from the play in question, as he didn't get in the refs' faces or wave his arms and throw a tantrum. He merely straightened his helmet out and got on with the game.

Posted

In baseball, the teams police that stuff themselves.

 

But if someone suggests using the Pats* own tactics against them, people here go nuts.

Posted

I didn't see the call in question, but you have to remember that it is a judgement call as to whether or not the officials will call a penalty on the Pats* for that. Much like it's a judgement call as to whether or not it's a penalty for anyone to even touch Brady in any fashion.

Posted

In baseball, the teams police that stuff themselves.

 

But if someone suggests using the Pats* own tactics against them, people here go nuts.

 

I guess you're referring to the thread calling for a cheap shot to knock Brady out of the game. Are you really surprised that most fans find that offensive?

Posted

I guess you're referring to the thread calling for a cheap shot to knock Brady out of the game. Are you really surprised that most fans find that offensive?

 

Not knock him out of the game. Just hit him.

Posted

LOL the play in question, Lucks head went down and HIT the helmet from the force of the hit.. That said, the Pats had a lot of penalties in that game, the refs were doing EVERYTHING they could try keep it a close game. They failed...

 

Oh and Luck already part of the protected QB club, he is considered the future of the NFL w rogers.

Posted

Earlier in the game Mayo got a flag for a hit on luck that wasn't helmet to helmet, refs aren't perfect, it's not always a conspiracy.

 

Earlier in the game Mayo got a flag for a hit on luck that wasn't helmet to helmet, refs aren't perfect, it's not always a conspiracy.

Posted (edited)

LOL the play in question, Lucks head went down and HIT the helmet from the force of the hit.. That said, the Pats had a lot of penalties in that game, the refs were doing EVERYTHING they could try keep it a close game. They failed...

 

Oh and Luck already part of the protected QB club, he is considered the future of the NFL w rogers.

 

Penalties 4-70 on the Putz? You call that the refs were doing EVERYTHING they could ??? BWAAA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaaa

 

You Pats fans are sooooo delusional.

 

Just remember they Cheatriots were 1-2 with the unbiased scab refs

Edited by BillsFan-4-Ever
Posted

Penalties 4-70 on the Putz? You call that the refs were doing EVERYTHING they could ??? BWAAA HAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaaa

 

You Pats fans are sooooo delusional.

 

Just remember they Cheatriots were 1-2 with the unbiased scab refs

 

You lost it... the Pats had 4 just on ONE O lineman! They had like 8 penalties before the Colts were called for ONE.. but hey whatever...

 

As for the "unbiased" refs.. only delusional Bills fans call them that, but lets see those Unbiased refs either "accidentally" made the wrong call or were biased against NE to have them lose those 2 games... And the Pats 3 losses COMBINED are by less than a TD...

Posted (edited)

the play in question, Lucks head went down and HIT the helmet from the force of the hit..

 

Any thoughts on the guy leaving his feet to hit the QB high after he got rid of the ball?

Edited by BILLS_ROC
Posted (edited)

You lost it... the Pats had 4 just on ONE O lineman! They had like 8 penalties before the Colts were called for ONE.. but hey whatever...

 

As for the "unbiased" refs.. only delusional Bills fans call them that, but lets see those Unbiased refs either "accidentally" made the wrong call or were biased against NE to have them lose those 2 games... And the Pats 3 losses COMBINED are by less than a TD...

Did you not see the numbers I posted? Those are Stats from ESPN.

 

Let me make it easy for you.

 

http://espn.go.com/n...ameId=321118017

 

COLTS Penalties 1-5 and PUTRIDS Penalties 4-70

 

You Pats fans are sooooo delusional.

 

Maybe if they hadn't run up the score the Ref might have let 1 or 2 go like they normally do

 

Here is the OFFICIAL NFL page

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2012111806/2012/REG11/colts@patriots#menu=gameinfo&tab=analyze&analyze=boxscore

 

Penalties (Number-Yards) COLTS 1 - 5 , Penalties (Number-Yards) PUTRIDS 4 - 70

 

Don't you Putz Fans have a board of your own to post (TROLL) on?

Edited by BillsFan-4-Ever
Posted

You must remember that to a fan of the Cheats* 4 penalties seems like a lot--after all, it's about twice what they normally get called for....

×
×
  • Create New...