PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 It appears you are agree we are losing due to the QB position, so I am satisfied with that. We will agree to disagree about Bradford. You have real trouble with appearances.
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 I will rephrase...due in part to the QB position. Anybody with a pulse knows our defense has been horrible.
Cash Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 There's only 108 B word session threads about Fitz? Seems low to me. Haha, fair point! By the way, even after a 4-yard loss, Steven Jackson is still averaging over 5 yards a carry, and yet the Rams refuse to give him the ball consistently. I don't think I've seen them run on first down yet. Seem familiar?
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 I will rephrase...due in part to the QB position. Anybody with a pulse knows our defense has been horrible. I'm glad you said that. I was wondering what games you were watching. As I said Fitz is not great, but I wouldn't replace him with Bradford. PTR
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Lol. And I would. Have a great day, PTR . I'm glad you said that. I was wondering what games you were watching. As I said Fitz is not great, but I wouldn't replace him with Bradford. PTR Haha, fair point! By the way, even after a 4-yard loss, Steven Jackson is still averaging over 5 yards a carry, and yet the Rams refuse to give him the ball consistently. I don't think I've seen them run on first down yet. Seem familiar? At least he is in the game.
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Posted November 18, 2012 Come on rams do something! Gee that teams awfully flat
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Well here is a chance for Bradford to show how "clutch" he is.
Cash Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) At least he is in the game. Not on this drive. And right on cue, Daryl Richardson fumbles to basically ice the game. Hopefully this teaches Jeff Fisher to play his star running back a little more. Edit: Daryl Richardson fumble was cued up, not standing in line. Edited November 18, 2012 by Cash
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Can Bradford make even one scoring drive with a short field?
tito1 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 0-2 today as Jets and Bengals are both gonna win. KC is a train wreck
Big C Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Should have picked up the Cardinals D today instead of the Rams. Go figure.
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) This ones over but a couple potential upsets in the making with the henne- led jags leading Texans and browns ahead of cowboys. Be grim day for texas football if they both hold on. Poz with a key pick btw when it looked like rexans were driving to tie it Edited November 18, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack
Cash Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 I've seen 3 times now where the Jets jumped offsides, but got back onsides without anyone on the Rams moving or snapping the ball to take advantage. And two of them were on third down, one of which was a third and 1. Terrible job by the Rams. Nice throw by Bradford on the TD, then an inexplicable decision to go for 2 by Fisher. I guess the Rams are playing for OT?
Cash Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Maybe Jeff Fisher is going against Legatron in fantasy, and doesn't want to give up the point for the extra point? Not sure why else to go for two there.
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Tebow is awesome In the hunt: Bills Why the checkdowns?
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Posted November 18, 2012 Anyone have blackmon today? 221 yards and a TD so far WOW
Cash Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 I think Ian Eagle broke up with Tebow on that 3rd and 7 run: "3rd and 7, Tebow in the game, Tebow circling... and it's just not working." Meanwhile, I thought the flag was going to be for intentional grounding, but instead it's roughing the passer. Technically correct call for helmet-to-helmet contact, but could've let that go. Update: And whaddya know, they called the grounding after all! Interesting. Never seen grounding and roughing called on the same play before.
Recommended Posts