C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Put him in our system, I'd say he would perform better. Good argument based on nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Smaller QB, weaker arm, still makes bad throws. I'm not putting Bradford on a pedestal....this just shows you how bad I think Fitz is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Bradford really has no targets though. Not seeingmuch if any seperation from rams WRs. Amendola is their best, and thats really not saying much And he got hurt in the 2Q. Still, Bradford looks terrible. No reason to miss the wide open guy on the last Rams play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Share Posted November 18, 2012 How bout them jags hanging tough against Texans with henne under center Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Bradford really has no targets though. Not seeingmuch if any seperation from rams WRs. Amendola is their best, and thats really not saying much What is this crap? Our current receiving core features our star receiver (former 7th rounder who did nothing before Fitz became a starter); a 3rd round rookie, a tight end who had 0 career catches before Buffalo and was cut by 2 teams, and a whole lot of undrafted FAs (Nelson, Jones, Roosevelt). But you're right. The Bills are loaded with targets and Fitz deserves no credit for any of the success those guys have had. Fitz sucks. Smaller QB, weaker arm, still makes bad throws. I'm not putting Bradford on a pedestal....this just shows you how bad I think Fitz is. And how big of a hater you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) Huge hater. Correct. Win a game in the clutch and I may convert. What is this crap? Our current receiving core features our star receiver (former 7th rounder who did nothing before Fitz became a starter); a 3rd round rookie, a tight end who had 0 career catches before Buffalo and was cut by 2 teams, and a whole lot of undrafted FAs (Nelson, Jones, Roosevelt). But you're right. The Bills are loaded with targets and Fitz deserves no credit for any of the success those guys have had. Fitz sucks. And how big of a hater you are. The same 7th rounder everyone was so glad we resigned? Edited November 18, 2012 by Marauder24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Share Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) What is this crap? Our current receiving core features our star receiver (former 7th rounder who did nothing before Fitz became a starter); a 3rd round rookie, a tight end who had 0 career catches before Buffalo and was cut by 2 teams, and a whole lot of undrafted FAs (Nelson, Jones, Roosevelt). But you're right. The Bills are loaded with targets and Fitz deserves no credit for any of the success those guys have had. Fitz sucks. Calm down shorty. Have I even mentioned Fitz in this thread ? I will say you have to be completely out of your mind if you think bills receiving targets aren't superior to rams. Edited November 18, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Calm down shorty. Have I even mentioned Fitz in this thread ? I will say you have to be completely out of your mind if you think bills receiving targets aren't superior to rams. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Calm down shorty. Have I even mentioned Fitz in this thread ? I will say you have to be completely out of your mind if you think bills receiving targets aren't superior to rams. 6'1" by the way And are targets better because they play with a better QB? The Rams have spend high draft picks on receivers yet they underachieve. At what point do you blame the QB for this? Or does he not get blamed because he was good in college? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Huge hater. Correct. Win a game in the clutch and I may convert. Big comeback wins vs OAK and NE not count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Are you talking about the INT vs NE a few weeks ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heitz Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 One thing is for sure, both Bradford and Fitz should rely on their RBs more. The Rams seem to love to pass on 3rd and short too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Or the one vs Tennessee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Are you talking about the INT vs NE a few weeks ago? Obviously you can't remember anything beyond a few weeks ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Perhaps the two vs the Giants last year when Stevie had Webster beat deep? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Perhaps the two vs the Giants last year when Stevie had Webster beat deep? You mean like how Bradford is playing today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 And I'd also submit that Stevie would be a lot better with an accurate QB who consistently hit him in stride. You mean like how Bradford is playing today? Exactly. But since you've admitted he has a better arm, I'd prefer him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 And I'd also submit that Stevie would be a lot better with an accurate QB who consistently hit him in stride. Exactly. But since you've admitted he has a better arm, I'd prefer him. If that's all you want, then yes. We'll keep losing but the throws will be harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cash Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 Mods, please rename this thread to "Fitz B word session #108". Someone accidentally titled it "jets at rams game thread". Anyway, Sanchez has looked like absolute garbage on his last two throws, immediately after a couple nice pickups. I can't think of a QB as maddeningly inconsistent as Sanchez. Dude looked like Montana against us in the opener, but also has long stretches, sometimes whole games, of looking like the worst QB in the league. I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Share Posted November 18, 2012 If that's all you want, then yes. We'll keep losing but the throws will be harder. It appears you are agree we are losing due to the QB position, so I am satisfied with that. We will agree to disagree about Bradford. Mods, please rename this thread to "Fitz B word session #108". Someone accidentally titled it "jets at rams game thread". Anyway, Sanchez has looked like absolute garbage on his last two throws, immediately after a couple nice pickups. I can't think of a QB as maddeningly inconsistent as Sanchez. Dude looked like Montana against us in the opener, but also has long stretches, sometimes whole games, of looking like the worst QB in the league. I don't get it. There's only 108 B word session threads about Fitz? Seems low to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts