Wayne Cubed Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) The Jest have given up, or at least their defense has played like they have given up on the season. Or they're just really bad. Hahahaahaha terrible fake punt Edited November 18, 2012 by Wayne Cubed
KD in CA Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Janoris Jenkins looks pretty good, huh? I recall a lively debate about him (not that anyone was arguing he wasn't going to be a good player). The Tebow thing is just ridiculous. The Jets totally killed their momentum bringing him in for a handoff. And maybe Rex ran that fake punt a few too many times in September. LOL
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 I wish I had this game instead of Dallas Cleveland / GB Detroit
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Posted November 18, 2012 Jets are looking so foolish sticking with this tebow sub arrangement. Its simply not working. They're fortunate defense is keeping them in this game
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) I'd take Bradford in a millisecond over Fitz. I am betting if you polled every non-Bills coach in the NFL, it would be damn near unanimous. You gotta take off the Bills' tinted glasses, PTR. And you gotta take off your Fitz' hater glasses. A blind comparison of resumes isn't even close. http://www.nfl.com/player/sambradford/497095/careerstats http://www.nfl.com/player/ryanfitzpatrick/2506581/careerstats The only thing Bradford actually has that are better than Fitz is his draft status, arm strength, and size. Fitz is a better NFL QB than Bradford. Also, Bradford plays the majority of his games in a dome/ warm weather. But it's probably jsut Fitz' collection of stud 7th round pick and UDFAs that make him look so good. Fitz is very replaceable but this anyone is better than Fitz mantra is so tiring. Bradford is the sole reason the Jets are in this game. Edited November 18, 2012 by C.Biscuit97
Rob's House Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Walks on water? I must have been drunk when I compared him to Jesus. He has better physical tools and is a better QB. I'd love to see the numbers he puts up in our offense. Saying I'd take any QB over Fitz does not necessarily cast them into "elite" status. Jusus's game wouldn't translate to today's NFL.
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 In a millisecond. Jusus's game wouldn't translate to today's NFL. The linemen were a lot shorter back then.
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) 2012: Fitz: 2179yds, 62.5%, 17TDs, 10INTs, 87.0 rating, 4-6 record Bradford: 2072yds, 62.2%, 11TDs, 8INTs, 85.3 rating, 3-5-1 record --------------------------------------- 2011: Fitz: 3832yds, 62.0%, 24TDs, 23TDs, 79.1 rating, 6-10 record Bradford: 2164yds, 53.5%, 6TDs, 6INTs, 70.5 rating, 2-14 record ------------------------------------ 2010: Fitz: 3,000yds, 57.8%, 23TDs, 15 INTs, 81.8 rating 4-10 record Bradford: 3,512yds, 60.0%, 18TDs, 15INTs, 76.5 rating, 7-9 record. Here's a comparison of the last three season's of Fitz and Bradford. What exactly says Bradford is far superior to Fitz? To me Bradford is a QB who was a big hype out of college, a #1 pick overall we never see, so we assume he must be a 100X better than Fitz. Please prove me wrong. Again...not arguing Fitz is some awesome QB. Just that Bradford is nothing special so far. PTR Edited November 18, 2012 by PromoTheRobot
KD in CA Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Jusus's game wouldn't translate to today's NFL. He certainly had a noodle arm, but his intangibles were off the charts.
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 He certainly had a noodle arm, but his intangibles were off the charts. Also, would he be allowed to play on Sundays? That could be a problem.
jimmy10 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 I've heard of Bradford. Therefore, he is superior.
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Janoris Jenkins looks pretty good, huh? I recall a lively debate about him (not that anyone was arguing he wasn't going to be a good player). The Tebow thing is just ridiculous. The Jets totally killed their momentum bringing him in for a handoff. And maybe Rex ran that fake punt a few too many times in September. LOL Jenkins is in the Pacman mold. He got suspended by the the team last week. So talented, so risky. Personally, I'd pass on guys like that unless they were late rounder or UDFAs.
KD in CA Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Also, would he be allowed to play on Sundays? That could be a problem. Naah, he's Jewish. The Sabbath is over by Sunday.
C.Biscuit97 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) 2012: Fitz: 2179yds, 62.5%, 17TDs, 10INTs, 87.0 rating, 4-6 record Bradford: 2072yds, 62.2%, 11TDs, 8INTs, 85.3 rating, 3-5-1 record --------------------------------------- 2011: Fitz: 3832yds, 62.0%, 24TDs, 23TDs, 79.1 rating, 6-10 record Bradford: 2164yds, 53.5%, 6TDs, 6INTs, 70.5 rating, 2-14 record ------------------------------------ 2010: Fitz: 3,000yds, 57.8%, 23TDs, 15 INTs, 81.8 rating 4-10 record Bradford: 3,512yds, 60.0%, 18TDs, 15INTs, 76.5 rating, 7-9 record. Here's a comparison of the last three season's of Fitz and Bradford. What exactly says Bradford is far superior to Fitz? To me Bradford is a QB who was a big hype out of college, a #1 pick overall we never see, so we assume he must be a 100X better than Fitz. Please prove me wrong. Again...not arguing Fitz is some awesome QB. Just that Bradford is nothing special so far. PTR Um, Bradford went to a better football school than Fitz. Thus, he's better. Signed, Jimmy Clausen, Blaine Gabbert, Rex Grossman, Mark Sanchez, Matt Leinart Edited November 18, 2012 by C.Biscuit97
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 (edited) Bradford making Ellis Lankster look like Revis. If that were Fitz we'd be throwing bricks at the TV. Edited November 18, 2012 by PromoTheRobot
sodbuster Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Holding? Is David Patterson reffing out there?
Bronc24 Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Put him in our system, I'd say he would perform better.
truth on hold Posted November 18, 2012 Author Posted November 18, 2012 Bradford really has no targets though. Not seeingmuch if any seperation from rams WRs. Amendola is their best, and thats really not saying much
PromoTheRobot Posted November 18, 2012 Posted November 18, 2012 Put him in our system, I'd say he would perform better. Bigger QB, stronger arm, still makes bad throws. PTR
Recommended Posts