Jump to content

Benghazi


Recommended Posts

 

It's not the evil that people question. It's the ridiculously incompetent response that came from Obama and Hillary, leaving four Americans for dead while trying to figure out how to dress their soliders, and trying to pass it off on a Youtube video when every thinking person knew differently.

and did tre' gowdy found that the outcome could have been changed at that point in time by the actions of Clinton or Obama?

 

how bout the outcomes in Beirut? did the dems of the time make a circus of that tragedy? it's unseemly and lacking any class. but expected from a party that supports a crude mechanical such as trump.

Edited by birdog1960
Link to comment
Share on other sites

and did tre' gowdy found that the outcome could have been changed at that point in time by the actions of Clinton or Obama?

 

how bout the outcomes in Beirut? did the dems of the time make a circus of that tragedy? it's unseemly and lacking any class. but expected from a party that supports a crude mechanical such as trump.

 

Did Reagan deflect Beirut blame on the airing of Ishtar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

House Republicans' Report Sheds New Light on Benghazi Attack

by Andrea Mitchell

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/house-republicans-report-sheds-new-light-benghazi-attack-n600121

House Benghazi report slams administration response to attacks

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/28/house-benghazi-report-slams-administration-response-to-attacks.html?intcmp=hpbt1

House Benghazi Report Confirms ‘Spontaneous Video Protest’ Story Was Deliberate Political Disinformation

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/28/house-benghazi-report-confirms-video-protest-story-deliberate-political-disinformation/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You blindly support a candidate who should be in prison. I would hardly say you're in a position of morally principled superiority.

 

Actually, he supported Sanders until his principles (which he defines as only applying when there's something in it for himself -- you know, the opposite of the actual definition) led him to Hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Did Reagan deflect Beirut blame on the airing of Ishtar?

if he had would you have expected George McGovern to head a multiyear committee costing millions of dollars to investigate it? and at the end, if there were no new findings, would you be happy with McGovern?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if he had would you have expected George McGovern to head a multiyear committee costing millions of dollars to investigate it? and at the end, if there were no new findings, would you be happy with McGovern?

 

Let's get back on topic. The whole reason that GOP launched the investigation is due to the lies & deflection by the most transparent administration in US history.

 

I'm not going to get into your never ending circle jerk of hypotheticals.

 

The fact is, US officials got killed and Clinton & Obama lied for political expediency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Let's get back on topic. The whole reason that GOP launched the investigation is due to the lies & deflection by the most transparent administration in US history.

 

I'm not going to get into your never ending circle jerk of hypotheticals.

 

The fact is, US officials got killed and Clinton & Obama lied for political expediency.

it is on topic. it's called an analogy. those americans did not die because of the actions in question. therefore, saliva on their grave reference is a disgusting, classless, statement that no one here challenged but me. but again, what should one expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if he had would you have expected George McGovern to head a multiyear committee costing millions of dollars to investigate it? and at the end, if there were no new findings, would you be happy with McGovern?

 

Good Lord..............so much fail

 

Tip O'Neill headed up the House investigation (McGovern was a Senator)

 

They didn't need a multiyear committee.....(finished in two months) because the Reagan administration cooperated, no subpoenas necessary.

 

They did find the administration negligent......as they did today......so I find your "there were no new findings" very illustrative

 

 

 

 

 

Let's get back on topic. The whole reason that GOP launched the investigation is due to the lies & deflection by the most transparent administration in US history.

 

I'm not going to get into your never ending circle jerk of hypotheticals.

 

The fact is, US officials got killed and Clinton & Obama lied for political expediency.

 

 

 

Absolutely correct................

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is on topic. it's called an analogy. those americans did not die because of the actions in question. therefore, saliva on their grave reference is a disgusting, classless, statement that no one here challenged but me. but again, what should one expect?

 

False.

 

Not that facts matter to you. Or intellectual honesty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Good Lord..............so much fail

 

Tip O'Neill headed up the House investigation (McGovern was a Senator)

 

They didn't need a multiyear committee.....(finished in two months) because the Reagan administration cooperated, no subpoenas necessary.

 

They did find the administration negligent......as they did today......so I find your "there were no new findings" very illustrative

 

 

 

 

 

Absolutely correct................

 

 

Good Lord..............so much fail

 

Tip O'Neill headed up the House investigation (McGovern was a Senator)

 

They didn't need a multiyear committee.....(finished in two months) because the Reagan administration cooperated, no subpoenas necessary.

 

They did find the administration negligent......as they did today......so I find your "there were no new findings" very illustrative

 

 

 

 

 

Absolutely correct................

and did that destroy your high opinion of Reagan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually, he supported Sanders until his principles (which he defines as only applying when there's something in it for himself -- you know, the opposite of the actual definition) led him to Hillary.

Only birdbrain says morality is irrelevant after saying he supported Bernie for his values as a person.

 

He's a walking contradiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That administration might have been negligent in that they didn't foresee the danger to the Marines stationed there.

Regan never figuratively spit on their graves though. Regan never lied to the American people about what happened, nor did he blame their deaths on some ridiculous, fictitious construct in order to keep him ahead in the polls going into an election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is on topic. it's called an analogy. those americans did not die because of the actions in question. therefore, saliva on their grave reference is a disgusting, classless, statement that no one here challenged but me. but again, what should one expect?

It is an absolute fact. If you choose not to see it that is your problem pal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And now one of them is trying to be our next president, which should be unacceptable to anyone.

Party trumps ideology

ideology trumps integrity

winning is simply more important than values

 

What's perceived to be bad about the opposition is more important than what's good about your candidate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only birdbrain says morality is irrelevant after saying he supported Bernie for his values as a person.

 

He's a walking contradiction.

I said morality is unimportant in a bar fight which is what gowdy started and got whipped in.

 

False.

 

Not that facts matter to you. Or intellectual honesty.

you are truly shameless. the proof or lack thereof, is right here on this page. there you go calling black, white again. frickin shameless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...