Azalin Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Died and then lied. Big difference. So you are lying, actually. Yes, there was a bad thing that happened and the administration tried flubbing it. The Conspiracy theories you clowns are spewing try and cloud that difference for political reasons Now Bush did lie and THEN Americans died sorry you don't get the point, but I tried to use as many small words as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Late in the report we learn that “the Administration’s initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate.” You don’t say! Also that “The process and edits made to these talking points was flawed.” And for this, the usual suspects in the media say the GOP should be ashamed? Really? It’s almost like a less obsequious press might think something else might be amiss. The House Intelligence Committee’s Benghazi Report — more than fair The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has issued its report on the Benghazi attack. You can find it here. The Committee concludes, among things, that CIA personnel on the ground in Benghazi during the attack behaved bravely and made reasonable tactical decisions that saved lives, and that the CIA received all military support that was available. It further concludes that after the attack, the administration’s initial public narrative (via Susan Rice) on the causes and motivations for the attack was not fully accurate. In addition, edits made to the Benghazi “talking points” were not fully accurate, and the process that produced the talking points was flawed. However, the Committee stops short of finding misconduct or bad faith on the part of Susan Rice or any other administration official. Why didn’t the Committee make such findings, one way or the other? The main reason, I suspect, is that the Republican members wanted bipartisan agreement as to the facts (including the fact that Rice’s comments were inaccurate). Keep in mind too that the House Intelligence Committee is something of an island of bipartisanship in the stormy seas of Capitol Hill, which is probably a good thing given the vital and sensitive nature of its work. Republican members must also have been mindful that Trey Gowdy’s special committee is tasked investigating the Obama administration’s post-attack behavior, among other things. Thus, the honesty and good faith of Team Obama (or the lack thereof) remains the subject of an important, well-publicized House investigation. Indeed, by not opining on this subject, the Intelligence Committee invites Gowdy’s committee to focus sharply on it, and precludes any valid claim that the issue was resolved by another committee. Team Obama and its friends in the media may try to create the impression that the administration has dodged a bullet on Benghazi. In reality, it hasn’t. Rather, a bipartisan House committee has found that key statements by the administration about Benghazi were false. And it has left for Gowdy’s committee the task of determining Whether the false statements were bad faith efforts to deceive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Now Hillary Clinton did lie and THEN Americans died Fixed it for you there, knob-gobbler. http://youtu.be/HtK9AzcU42g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Died and then lied. Big difference. So you are lying, actually. Yes, there was a bad thing that happened and the administration tried flubbing it. The Conspiracy theories you clowns are spewing try and cloud that difference for political reasons Now Bush did lie and THEN Americans died So if the lie comes after the deaths it's ok? Oh that's right you're the one that thought the whole thing was funny and that all Presidents lie so there is notihg to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 (edited) there's nothing to see here. a politically motivated witch hunt committee said so. fini... Edited November 24, 2014 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 there's nothing to see here. a politically motivated witch hunt committee said so. fini... You may like being lied to but many of us do not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 there's nothing to see here. a politically motivated witch hunt committee said so. fini... This is false. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 there's nothing to see here. a politically motivated witch hunt committee said so. fini... So now we've gone from conspiracy theories to politically motivated witch hunts. Government accountability is now a pipe dream of the radical fringe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 So now we've gone from conspiracy theories to politically motivated witch hunts. Government accountability is now a pipe dream of the radical fringe? It can't be both? Colonel Mustard with the candlestick in the library. President Brown and Senator Green (D) were involved in the coverup. The Truth is out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 It can't be both? Colonel Mustard with the candlestick in the library. That's not a conspiracy. A conspiracy would be where Colonel Mustard and Mrs. Peacock framed Professor Plum by placing the lead pipe in the library. President Brown and Senator Green (D) were involved in the coverup. Racist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Frenkle Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Racist. I was gonna say President Black, but he's only 50/50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted November 25, 2014 Share Posted November 25, 2014 I was gonna say President Black, but he's only 50/50. What's the senator green with? Envious of Republicans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Bring out the brass band and start the hype! ITS HERE!! On a Friday before a holiday weekend? http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/27/opinion/gail-collins-counting-benghazi-blessings.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region®ion=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=0 http://intelligence.house.gov/investigative-report-terrorist-attacks-us-facilities-benghazi-libya-september-11-12-2012 What a partisan joke. What a goose chase The silence was pretty deafening. Except for Senator Lindsey Graham, who helpfully told CNN: “I think the report’s full of crap.” And Newt Gingrich, who theorized that the Intelligence Committee had been “co-opted by the C.I.A.” Newt knows. (“I’ve talked to four different people who have a real interest in this topic at a professional level. They are appalled by this report.”) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Still laughing about the WH and State Dept leaving four people for dead I see. Obviously much for you to give thanks for today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Still laughing about the WH and State Dept leaving four people for dead I see. Obviously much for you to give thanks for today. Imagine the posts if the Administration was from the other side of the aisle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 The answer regarding this committee's findings was in post #1422, I am unsurprised that those who do not understand this story (nor much else) did not comprehend it. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Darin we had plenty of real scandals when Bush was President over Americans dying overseas You labeled that partsan too, in trying to explain away criticism of Bush B-Man, you are just an idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Darin we had plenty of real scandals when Bush was President over Americans dying overseas You labeled that partsan too, in trying to explain away criticism of Bush Prove it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Prove it Don't have to. I remember. During Bush's presidency attacks against Americans were more than four will killed happened a lot in the middle east, all the time really. You were cry "partisanship!" all the time while saying you didn't support anyone, but liberals are evil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Don't have to. I remember. During Bush's presidency attacks against Americans were more than four will killed happened a lot in the middle east, all the time really. You were cry "partisanship!" all the time while saying you didn't support anyone, but liberals are evil So in other words, may I mommy dog face to the banana patch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts