B-Man Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 Sources in Benghazi challenge NYT report Fifteen months after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, the narrative of the attack continues to be shaped, and reshaped, by politicians and the press. But a New York Times report published over the weekend has angered sources who were on the ground that night. Those sources, who continue to face threats of losing their jobs, sharply challenged the Times’ findings that there was no involvement from Al Qaeda or any other international terror group and that an anti-Islam film played a role in inciting the initial wave of attacks. “It was a coordinated attack. It is completely false to say anything else. … It is completely a lie,” one witness to the attack told Fox News. .
IDBillzFan Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 (edited) Sources in Benghazi challenge NYT report. We don't need sources in Benghazi challenging the NYT report. The freaking WH said it was a terrorist act. Are we supposed to believe that when the Obamas return from Hawaii that he'll start pushing the video story again? Please make that so. Please. :lol: Edited December 30, 2013 by LABillzFan
Koko78 Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 Sources in Benghazi challenge NYT report “It was a coordinated attack. It is completely false to say anything else. … It is completely a lie,” one witness to the attack told Fox News. A spontaneously-coordinated planned attack? Maybe the white hispanics had something to do with it.
DC Tom Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 A spontaneously-coordinated planned attack? Maybe the white hispanics had something to do with it. "If you like your spontaneous Islamic transnational terrorist organization, you can keep it. Period."
Alaska Darin Posted December 30, 2013 Posted December 30, 2013 "If you like your spontaneous Islamic transnational terrorist organization, you can keep it. Period."
B-Man Posted December 31, 2013 Posted December 31, 2013 Defense Expert Concludes the NY Times’ Benghazi Report ‘Backfired’ on the Paper by Noah Rothman Foundation for Defense of Democracies senior fellow Thomas Joscelyn joined WSJ Live host Mary Kissel on Monday to discuss an investigative report on the September 11, 2012, attack on an American consulate in Benghazi by New York Times reporter David Kirkpatrick. Both Kissel and Joscelyn agreed that, while Kirkpatrick’s reporting was extensive, the conclusions he reached were erroneous. Furthermore, if there was a political objective that the Times sought to achieve with this report, the effort has thoroughly “backfired.” http://www.mediaite.com/online/defense-expert-concludes-the-ny-times-benghazi-report-backfired-on-the-paper/ Benghazi Brawl: The pundits take on The New York Times by Howard Kurtz http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/31/benghazi-brawl-pundits-take-on-new-york-times/?intcmp=latestnews .
B-Man Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 The proper thing to do will be to let Hillary and Susan Rice hand out the prize money. State Dept. Offers $10 Million Reward to Find Benghazi Terrorists January 10,2014 The State Department today publicly announced a $10 million reward "for information leading to the arrest or conviction of any individual responsible for the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attacks." The announcement for the reward is posted on rewardsforjustice.net. Seeking Information Against International Terrorism Wanted Information leading to the arrest or conviction of any individual responsible for terrorist attack against the U.S. Special Mission Compound and Annex in Benghazi, Libya Up to $10 Million Reward "On September 11-12, 2012, four Americans — U.S. Ambassador to Libya John Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, and Protective Security Specialists Glen Anthony Doherty and Tyrone Snowden Woods— were killed in a terrorist attack against the U.S. Special Mission Compound and Annex in Benghazi, Libya. A series of attacks involving arson, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), and mortars was waged on two U.S. facilities in Benghazi, as well as U.S. personnel en route between the two facilities. In addition, the attacks severely wounded two U.S. personnel, injured three Libyan contract guards, and resulted in the destruction and abandonment of both facilities," reads the announcement. The summary of rewardsforjustice.net lists the four Americans killed in that terrorist attack. Because of "security issues" the offer of the $10 million reward had not been officially announced until today. .
3rdnlng Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 The proper thing to do will be to let Hillary and Susan Rice hand out the prize money. . "Because of "security issues" the offer of the $10 million reward had not been officially announced until today." What bullschit. As if they weren't 15 months late in offering a reward. Sure they had a reward out after this happened but didn't tell anyone. F'n joke.
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 Arrest or conviction?? WTF is THAT?!?! I rather liked the "up to" part of the reward.
Doc Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 Looks like Benghazi isn't as "manufactured" (read: a non-story) as people claim.
Koko78 Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 So if I go get that filmmaker who is responsible (according to the regime) for the spontaneously coordinated and planned Benghazi attack, do I get the "up to" $10,000,0000?
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 So if I go get that filmmaker who is responsible (according to the regime) for the spontaneously coordinated and planned Benghazi attack, do I get the "up to" $10,000,0000? What difference does it make??!!!??
DC Tom Posted January 11, 2014 Posted January 11, 2014 "Because of "security issues" the offer of the $10 million reward had not been officially announced until today." What bullschit. As if they weren't 15 months late in offering a reward. Sure they had a reward out after this happened but didn't tell anyone. F'n joke. Well...yeah. The "security issues" were all related to the Obama campaign securing reelection.
B-Man Posted January 14, 2014 Posted January 14, 2014 The Benghazi Transcripts: Top Defense officials briefed Obama on ‘attack,’ not video or protest Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/14/benghazi-transcripts-top-defense-officials-briefed-obama-on-attack-not-video-or/
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 The Benghazi Transcripts: Top Defense officials briefed Obama on ‘attack,’ not video or protest Minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi came under assault on Sept. 11, 2012, the nation's top civilian and uniformed defense officials -- headed for a previously scheduled Oval Office session with President Obama -- were informed that the event was a "terrorist attack," declassified documents show. The new evidence raises the question of why the top military men, one of whom was a member of the president's Cabinet, allowed him and other senior Obama administration officials to press a false narrative of the Benghazi attacks for two weeks afterward. http://www.foxnews.c...k-not-video-or/ Maybe a Republican governor closed a bridge between the President and his men and they could not meet to discuss it. Oh, sorry to bring up a real scandal, lol
IDBillzFan Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 (edited) Maybe a Republican governor closed a bridge between the President and his men and they could not meet to discuss it. Oh, sorry to bring up a real scandal, lol This latest report on Christie is going to blow everyone's mind. Impossible to think he knew in advance and could have stopped the bridge closing.. Edited January 15, 2014 by LABillzFan
3rdnlng Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 Maybe a Republican governor closed a bridge between the President and his men and they could not meet to discuss it. Oh, sorry to bring up a real scandal, lol One of the funniest things to have happened in a long time. I'm still laughing.
Doc Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 This latest report on Christie is going to blow everyone's mind. Impossible to think he knew in advance and could have stopped the bridge closing.. Please. People being delayed on an otherwise easy-to-cross bridge is a real scandal. Not a few deaths from a spontaneous demonstration on just another day, over an Internet video released months before.
Recommended Posts