Doc Posted November 19, 2012 Posted November 19, 2012 idk whats scarier, the top general in the country thinking that little email trick would protect him, or the puritan bozo public who gives a crap about consenting adults masterbating each other I vote c), a public that votes based on abortion, gay marriage, and immigration, instead of the economy.
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted November 19, 2012 Posted November 19, 2012 I was catching up on some reading, and found this article in Newsweek, printed less than a week before the news came out.... General David Petraeus’s Rules for Living thanks JJ, I'd never seen all these #5 has been quoted a few times, but seems like #1 might've been a part of his decision as well
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted November 19, 2012 Posted November 19, 2012 (edited) I vote c), a public that votes based on abortion, gay marriage, and immigration, instead of the economy. Michael Gerson, former Bush speechwriter opines Some of the most important intellectual groundwork is needed on the role of government. Mitt Romney had a five-part plan to encourage job creation. He lacked a public philosophy that explained government’s valid role in meeting human needs. Suburban women heard little about improved public education. Single women, particularly single mothers, heard little about their struggles, apart from an off-putting Republican critique of food stamps. Blue-collar workers in, say, Ohio heard little about the unique challenges that face declining industrial communities. Latinos heard little from Republicans about promoting equal opportunity and economic mobility. Neither a vague, pro-business orientation nor tea party ideology speaks to these Americans — except perhaps to alienate them. Conservatives will need to define a role for government that addresses human needs in effective, market-oriented ways. Americans fear public debt, and they resent intrusive bureaucracies, but they do not hate government. Edited November 19, 2012 by In-A-Gadda-Levitre
truth on hold Posted November 20, 2012 Author Posted November 20, 2012 Related story:The wife of a high-ranking US general who had an affair said in an interview that military marriages suffered from the protracted US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2012/1119/Is-infidelity-an-emotional-war-wound
/dev/null Posted November 20, 2012 Posted November 20, 2012 Related story:The wife of a high-ranking US general who had an affair said in an interview that military marriages suffered from the protracted US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. http://www.csmonitor...ional-war-wound Was this General named Franco? Because you do know he's still dead, right? Deployed soldiers/sailors often find comfort in the arms of others when they are deployed. And like Petraus' wife, the stay at home spouse knows it The stay at home spouse often find comfort in the arms of others when their spouse is deployed. And the deployed spouse knows it. I've had a few dates with navy wives and even a couple of dates that ended with oh by the way...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted November 21, 2012 Posted November 21, 2012 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/paula-broadwell-poses-submachine-gun-article-1.1205335
....lybob Posted November 21, 2012 Posted November 21, 2012 http://www.nydailyne...ticle-1.1205335 looks like a NRA wet dream
truth on hold Posted November 21, 2012 Author Posted November 21, 2012 (edited) Those Kelley sisters have reality TV show written all over them. I only watch sports and some news on TV, but if I watched shows sadly Id probably tune in to the Kelley Sisters Edited November 21, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack
KD in CA Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 By the way, whatever happen to "General Betrayus"? I thought this was the guy who was 'cooking the books' for the Bush Administration in Iraq. Now suddenly every left winger is crying that we cant live without him. The last man in uniform liberals fawned over this much was Richard Gere.
3rdnlng Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 By the way, whatever happen to "General Betrayus"? I thought this was the guy who was 'cooking the books' for the Bush Administration in Iraq. Now suddenly every left winger is crying that we cant live without him. The last man in uniform liberals fawned over this much was Richard Gere. Mayo?
UConn James Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Woodward: Petreus got an offer from FOXNews' Ailes to run a presidential campaign in 2011. http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/fox-news-chiefs-failed-attempt-to-enlist-petraeus-as-presidential-candidate/2012/12/03/15fdcea8-3d77-11e2-a2d9-822f58ac9fd5_story_1.html McFarland mentioned her conversation with Petraeus in a FoxNews.com piece on April 27, 2011. “Our discussion was off the record, and to respect that I will not quote the general,” she wrote. By that time, it was clear that Petraeus would be nominated as CIA director. “I can’t help thinking that the Obama administration has done something a bit underhanded but politically shrewd by tapping Petraeus for the CIA,” she added, because it would remove him as a “potential rival” in the presidential contest. Even when someone says they aren't running for president... minds change. The CIA appointment took him out for 2012... and the affair leak from Obama's FBI took him out of the running for everything after. How convenient....
....lybob Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Woodward: Petreus got an offer from FOXNews' Ailes to run a presidential campaign in 2011. http://www.washingto...d5_story_1.html Even when someone says they aren't running for president... minds change. The CIA appointment took him out for 2012... and the affair leak from Obama's FBI took him out of the running for everything after. How convenient.... I think the word you are looking for is genius
Recommended Posts