stevestojan Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 Just curious. Better than stevestojan! 191370[/snapback] But I think Lindell would be better.. NO ONE is backing his loser ass... "I don't give a Lindell" --.... hmmm, has a nice ring to it.
DC Tom Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 I'm sorry...but for me, sh-- will always be synonymous with "Pendry".
Like A Mofo Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 But I think Lindell would be better.. NO ONE is backing his loser ass... "I don't give a Lindell" --.... hmmm, has a nice ring to it. 191373[/snapback] I like it. I vote for the change. Maybe F can be changed to Drew.. "I dont give a Drew" "Drew You!"
OnTheRocks Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 I'm sorry...but for me, sh-- will always be synonymous with "Pendry". 191377[/snapback] i have the same thing...but it was always "Pete Carroll"
JCBoston Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 I'm sorry...but for me, sh-- will always be synonymous with "Pendry". 191377[/snapback] Ahhh... what a relief: Perspective. Now *that* sucked.
Alaska Darin Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 While I'm no fan of Drew's onfield performance (that's mild), he's always been a class guy and certainly deserves better than that.
spidey Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 I'm sorry...but for me, sh-- will always be synonymous with "Pendry". 191377[/snapback] Damn I just fell asleep just reading that name again.
spidey Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 While I'm no fan of Drew's onfield performance (that's mild), he's always been a class guy and certainly deserves better than that. 191490[/snapback] Agreed Drew seems like a nice guy etc just not convinced he is the best QB on the roster at this time. I just want a proper fair battle in off season and hope that the OC and other ocoaches start looking at plays that JP can run instead of relying on a perfect pocket all day long.
Alaska Darin Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 Agreed Drew seems like a nice guy etc just not convinced he is the best QB on the roster at this time. I just want a proper fair battle in off season and hope that the OC and other ocoaches start looking at plays that JP can run instead of relying on a perfect pocket all day long. 191527[/snapback] I'm only talking about making his name mean an expletive. Though the perfect pocket should certainly be a goal, regardless of QB.
Albany,n.y. Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 I vote for LINDELL. Drew does not play well without TEs in his offense. He played like LINDELL ever since Campbell & Euhus went down. LINDELL, even Luke McCown would have looked good against SF.
BF_in_Indiana Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 Just curious. Better than stevestojan! 191370[/snapback] I was about to post the exact same thing and happened to see this My vote is DEFINATELY for "Drew". It rhymes with "poo".
eSJayDee Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 While I'm no fan of Drew's onfield performance (that's mild), he's always been a class guy and certainly deserves better than that. You have a point there. How about we change the excrement/Stevestojan filter to be "Drew's onfield performance" ?
rockpile Posted January 4, 2005 Author Posted January 4, 2005 Just a joke, I really do not want sh-- (the word anyway) changed.
Recommended Posts