DC Tom Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 For not forecasting the Aquila earthquake. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20025626
KD in CA Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 So they got off on the witchcraft charges, huh?
Beerball Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 For not forecasting the Aquila earthquake. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20025626 Read about this prior to the trial. Hard to believe they were convicted.
Chef Jim Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 I don't know which is harder to believe. Scientists being convicted of manslaughter for not warning of an earthquake or Tom starting a thread.
DrDawkinstein Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 Travesty of justice and intelligence. Absolutely sickening.
dhg Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 (edited) I've seen this 'logic' elsewhere.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpMjakNhZTc Well played, sir! Edited October 23, 2012 by dhg
BuffaloBill Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 I don't know which is harder to believe. Scientists being convicted of manslaughter for not warning of an earthquake or Tom starting a thread. Tom starting a thread...
Buff_bills4ever Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 They had one job, they didn't do it. Italy's got their **** down...
Nanker Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 Wait till the EPA gets to control the laws completely. They'll be putting people in chains for smoking and drinking 65 oz or more of soda at a time.
Just Jack Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 Wait till the EPA gets to control the laws completely. They'll be putting people in chains for smoking and drinking 65 oz or more of soda at a time. Good thing I put my limit at 44oz. (since that's the biggest cup my local convience store carries)
McBeane Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 When are meteorologists going to get convicted of predicting a hurricanes path wrong or not properly alerting the public to a tornado that is going to touch down? That's the next logical step
Just Jack Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 When are meteorologists going to get convicted of predicting a hurricanes path wrong or not properly alerting the public to a tornado that is going to touch down? That's the next logical step Oh, it's coming soon, now that the Weather Channel decided to start naming snow storms.... http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-10-02/news/34222134_1_winter-storms-tropical-storms-weather-channel Just think, instead of remembering the Blizzard of '77, you could call it "Fred".
kegtapr Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 Oh, it's coming soon, now that the Weather Channel decided to start naming snow storms.... http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-10-02/news/34222134_1_winter-storms-tropical-storms-weather-channel Just think, instead of remembering the Blizzard of '77, you could call it "Fred". They should be rated on the french toast scale.
Just Jack Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 They should be rated on the french toast scale. "You remember Fred? Oh what a week that was, hard to believe it only scored an 8 on the French Toast Scale."
MDH Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 I'm guessing lots of students who were thinking of going into this field in Italy suddenly changed majors.
NoSaint Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 I'm guessing lots of students who were thinking of going into this field in Italy suddenly changed majors. atleast any of the ones smart enough to make good predictions.
Captain Hindsight Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 I'm guessing lots of students who were thinking of going into this field in Italy suddenly changed majors. I would. Even without the benefit of hindsight
Recommended Posts