1B4IDie Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 (edited) I hate these reactionary posts, but they are clearly not trying to win games anymore. Edited October 21, 2012 by Why So Serious?
boyst Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 I know! How did Fitz miss all those tackles! No reason he should have given up 200 yards to Chris Johnson!
marauderswr80 Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 No he just throws an int to cost the game!
billsFORlife50 Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Is there a reason Chan never went for a 2pt conversion after taking the lead?
tbonehawaii Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 He shouldn't have been throwing it in the first place.
Simon Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 I hate these reactionary posts, but they are clearly not trying to win games anymore. Yeah, because putting up only 34 points is the reason the Bills lost this one. He shouldn't have been throwing it in the first place. Are you freaking kidding me? You wanted him to run into the line and punt to bring that defense back on the field?
boyst Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Yeah, because putting up only 34 points is the reason the Bills lost this one. Are you freaking kidding me? You wanted him to run into the line and punt to bring that defense back on the field? He wouldn't have had to run into the line. That line was running all over him.
Buffalo 66 Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 This team did not deserve to win, they did not deserve to beat Arizona or Cleveland.I HOPE HEADS START TO ROLL! I wonder if Chan has any answers for this one? These guy's are comical.
Bills Fan888 Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 I don't think I'm gonna be able to handle this board right now. Too many idiotic posts like this one.
Virgil Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Yeah, because putting up only 34 points is the reason the Bills lost this one. So basically, if you score 34 points, you can just throw int's after that and do whatever you want? That's your logic?
Buffalo 66 Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Why not go for "TWO" Isn't the point to try and "WIN" the game?
Best Player Available Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Firing Gailey and cutting Fitz shouldn't happen until the end of the season. Firing Wanny should happen tomorrow AM at the latest.
CarolinaBill Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 The throw for the INT, and the bad clock management at the 1:30ish mark, just 2 more examples of why these 2 ultimately need to be replaced. At some point, after the defense yet AGAIN folds (which is a whole different issue) these guys have to figure out how to win games. Fitz, AGAIN, makes a horrible decision and get picked, giving tenn the time and position for the go ahead score. Chan, AGAIN, mismanages the game costing us valuable clock time for the final drive.
Captain Hindsight Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Why not go for "TWO" Isn't the point to try and "WIN" the game? It was the third quarter This thread has put me off the board for a while. If you think Fitz is the problem today you werent watching the game
Simon Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 So basically, if you score 34 points, you can just throw int's after that and do whatever you want? That's your logic? Yep, you got it. That's just what I said. I don't think I'm gonna be able to handle this board right now. Too many idiotic posts like this one. That's an excellent suggestion. Later.....
thewildrabbit Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Firing Gailey and cutting Fitz shouldn't happen until the end of the season. Firing Wanny should happen tomorrow AM at the latest. Naa let him stay, he won't ever get a job in the NFL after this year, and the Bills are assured of a better draft pick with him as DC
DallasBillsFan1 Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 At very end of game, why pass on 4rth and 2? Shouldn't we have run? We've got Splllier and Jackson who both had great games and we pass in that situation? Even if we pick up 1st and don't get out of bounds, we had a time out to burn. Maybe I'm not getting something??
Virgil Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 Good to know. Maybe the NFL should just change the rule to the first to 34 wins. I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or if this team has beaten you down so much that it's changed logic for you
DefenseWinzChampionshipz Posted October 21, 2012 Posted October 21, 2012 This team did not deserve to win, they did not deserve to beat Arizona or Cleveland.I HOPE HEADS START TO ROLL! I wonder if Chan has any answers for this one? These guy's are comical. I'll save u the trouble of waiting for the post game conference... He's going to say we need more mental toughness and that we need to stop the run better blahzay blahzay blah... If I was Chan I would go up to the interview and take the microphone out the holder, say sorry and drop the Mic on the floor like Jay-Z and walk away...
1B4IDie Posted October 21, 2012 Author Posted October 21, 2012 It was the third quarter This thread has put me off the board for a while. If you think Fitz is the problem today you werent watching the game Before the snap it was clear that TJ Graham would be wide open. After the snap TJ graham was wide open. Fitz throws where the Tennessee defense was clearly rolling coverage. INT. A High School QB could see what the defense was doing. TJ graham was wide open. That cost the game. In hindsight and foresight that was a stupid pass. Fitz is incompetent at playing NFL quality QB. If you can't see that you haven't been watching the last 16 + games.
Recommended Posts