Griswold Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 Yes, Bledsoe and Lindell were weak links yesterday. But a simmering issue with Tight End also hindered the offense. TE depth hurt the Bills ever since Campbell went to the IR, with Euhus right behind him. Think about it: Banta (really a long snapper), Neufeld, Trafford (rookie FA), Peters (really a Tackle), no great depth there. The numbers testify to that. Mularkey football requires a good TE, and we just don't have one behind Campbell. Remember Campbell's three TD performance against STL? Sweet. That was Mularkey Smash Mouth football! Maybe Euhus is OK, but the others are scrubs. Facing weak opponents (Miami, SF, Cleveland etc.) kept the achilles heal hidden. Pittsburg exposed and exploited TE problems. Good News: No major off season personnel moves required to fix this. Having Campbell and Euhus go down was just plain bad luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 In this era of the salary cap you can't afford to have great depth at all positions. Campbell & Euhus are ok in my book and whatever you can do in terms of a 3rd TE is dictated by the cap. After our top 2 went down, not only can't you afford to bring someone of quality in, you can't find such quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 No team can afford to carry 5 stud TEs on their roster and I seriously doubt if anyone can point to a team that wouldn't struggle if they lost their top 2 players at ANY position on the FB field. Please people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sullim4 Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 In a Bledsoe-centric offense, you need a decent TE. Look at Coates in NE, Riemersma here. Both thrived with Bledsoe, and Drew himself didn't look as bad as he does now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eSJayDee Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 You lose your top 2 guys at a position, you expect a dropoff. This was particularly apparent in this instance as we lost them in the same week. That said, I don't know whether it's by design, or lack of talent of the players we have, but I don't think the lack of contributions by our TEs contributes that much to the overall very poor production we get from our offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 I don't know, I really like Rod Trafford. It was fun to watch Troy Potatomelon throw him around like a wet towel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 I don't know, I really like Rod Trafford. It was fun to watch Troy Potatomelon throw him around like a wet towel. 191635[/snapback] It's no secret here that you like Rod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 3, 2005 Share Posted January 3, 2005 It's no secret here that you like Rod. 191637[/snapback] Thop it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob2232 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I am pretty sure mularkey of all people is not overlooking the importance of a TE. Also, random thought....Who would have thought our slash turned out to be Peters?! Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts