travdabest Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 I KNOW THE BILLS LIKE THEIR YOUTH MOVEMENT BUT WE'RE TRYING TOWIN NOW AND GILMORE AND WILLIANS ARENT PLAYMAKERS NEITHER NEVER LOOKS BACK FOR THE BALL, I REMEMBER ALL THE HATE CLEMENTS USE TO GET ION THIS FORUM BUT HE WAS THE LAST PLAYMAKER THE BILLS HAD A CB, INTS AND FF
Buftex Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 I have no problem with starting Gilmore. He has had some problems, particularly the last two games (name one Bills defender who hasn't), but I like a lot of what I see of him...let's give him just a little more time before we throw him on the "bust" pile. I also would like to see McKelvin starting...but I am afraid the coaching staff has already decided that this is his last year as a Bill, so he isn't going to start anymore, unless there are injuries. For all the talent McKelvin has, we should be getting more out of him. He has been great on returns...I am not sure that is enough for the Bills to re-sign him. I can't help but think he will end up with another team next year, and be far more productive. I am all over the place on this, I realize...sometimes I think the Bills are talentless, but other times I think they are a collection of very good talent, looking for some coaching. They make too many of the same mistakes over and over.
Dragonborn10 Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Gilmore and McKelvin shouw start, A. Williams is a safety playing corner. He can't turn and run with WR's. Searcy should play SS. No more Scott. When they need three safeites then it shoudl be Wilson and Searcy with Byrd. When they two LB's then play Sheppard or Morrison with Barnett. Enough of the big nickel concept - it isn't working.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 McGee doesn't have the legs anymore and McKelvin is just plain horrible and is only good for special teams.
reddogblitz Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 I agree that Leodis/McGee should replace Williams. I'd continue to start Gilmore. He might be OK. Williams is getting us killed out there. Let him sit for a while and watch and work on his game in practice. Leodis gets burned sometimes, but not several times a game like williams does.
CarolinaBill Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Williams is still essentially a rookie, give both of them time b4 rushing to judgement. Besides, we know what we have in mcgee/mckelvin (or rather what we dont have). Patience is still the operarive word with both williams and gilmore.
machine gun kelly Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Did you see Mckelvin against the Jets! He has no nose for the ball. An excellent return guy though so worth being on the team. I'd rotate McGee with Williams and when a nickel corner put McGee out there as he is a smart player. I have no idea who the heck is going to stop Fitgerald today.
Pirate Angel Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 untilll we can generate some type of pass rush it is pointless to discuss who should start at corner.
Luxy312 Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 There's no way I start McKelvin and McGee right now. Williams and Gilmore need playing time. Replacing our young guys who are making mistakes with what only might be a marginal upgrade isn't going to mean the difference between wins and losses, particularly in pass coverage. This team is starting to show me much of what they showed me last year. They can't stop the run worth a damn, which ultimately lets teams use play action to move the ball through the air as well. What's sad to me is they have a top-5 rushing attack in the NFL, but that the defense is allowing almost 30 more yards per game to opposing rushers. Until they learn to stop the run, our starting cornerbacks are irrelevant.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 I agree Williams has been a problem. In fact that name in general hasn't been as good as advertised anywhere on the field this year. But mckelvin is not the guy. I have watched him bite on double moves and never make a play on the ball for years. McGee has been rotating in with Williams and he missed some tackles too. He's good, was really good, but he'd slowed down a lot. Maybe Rodgers needs a shot outside. Gilmore is good just making rookie errors. He will get better. What the bills need is brooks back.
jkrules Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Until the bills start pressing with their corners and playing man to man with pressure up front, it does not matter who is playing corner. I like McGee but I am not sure he can cut it anymore. McKelvin, good on returns but not a capable corner.
Dr. Trooth Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 They deserve to be starting? Can they defend a receiver for more than 5 seconds? If they can, then start em, cause the Dline is allowing the QB all the time they want. I'm beginning to believe after every pass an opposing QB doesn't complete, Mario, Darius, or Kyle walk over to him and apologizes, saying "sorry man, I didn't give you enough time. I owe you one".
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 I think they should start for one full game so we can put this to rest. As much as I like McGee (and wish the light bulb were to go off for McKelvin), they would be a significant downgrade.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Williams is still essentially a rookie, give both of them time b4 rushing to judgement. Besides, we know what we have in mcgee/mckelvin (or rather what we dont have). Patience is still the operarive word with both williams and gilmore. yep
Recommended Posts