BuffaloBaumer Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Not a coincidence folks - the Bills are dead in the water until they find one. The confidence of this team has mirrored Fitz so get rid of him now.BrownsJaxTNKCOaklandBuffaloJets (although I think Sanchez is the best of the bunch)Every other team ahead of these has an up an coming rookie or a solid to excellent QB. Draft 7 fckin qbs if you have to next year and fix this shiitbag team once and for all......
McBeane Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Wait, so there's a correlation between success and a good QB? Thanks for the update.
thewildrabbit Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Not a coincidence folks - the Bills are dead in the water until they find one. The confidence of this team has mirrored Fitz so get rid of him now. Browns Jax TN KC Oakland Buffalo Jets (although I think Sanchez is the best of the bunch) Every other team ahead of these has an up an coming rookie or a solid to excellent QB. Draft 7 fckin qbs if you have to next year and fix this shiitbag team once and for all...... a dozen QB's won't fix the worst defense the NFL has ever seen
wonderbread Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 a dozen QB's won't fix the worst defense the NFL has ever seen But I thought that we were going to have the best dline and CB tandem in the league.
MDH Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 a dozen QB's won't fix the worst defense the NFL has ever seen With a good QB maybe we could get in WAC style shootouts and win games 56-52!
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 I forgot what wgr person had their theory to spend every draft pick on a QB until we found a franchise QB. It's obviously a radical idea that traditional football wisdom would go against..but after thinkig it over I would support this strategy 100%
McBeane Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 I forgot what wgr person had their theory to spend every draft pick on a QB until we found a franchise QB. It's obviously a radical idea that traditional football wisdom would go against..but after thinkig it over I would support this strategy 100% My first question is how the hell would you find enough reps in practice for 7 rookie QB's. It's not the worst idea on paper (albeit a close one) but the practicality is nil.
Astrobot Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Rd1-Geno Smith Rd2-Logan Thomas Rd3-AJ McCarron Rd4-Marqueis Gray Rd5-Casey Pachall Rd6-Brad Sorenson Rd7-Mike Glennon I think we'd be in RD3 before other teams figured out what we were doing!
HalftimeAdjustment Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 My first question is how the hell would you find enough reps in practice for 7 rookie QB's. It's not the worst idea on paper (albeit a close one) but the practicality is nil. Good point. I say QB in rounds 1-4. Rds 5-6, LB. Rd 7, WR *or* trade away our rd 7 pick for a rd 6 pick in 2014. On a related note I would try to trade away our Rd 7 picks every year.
wonderbread Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 I would trade away nearly the entire draft for Geno Smith.
Dragonborn10 Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 uhmmm thats 7 teams... Dam that's our problem on defense...we ahve been only playing 10 guys And on offense the route tree stops at 8... Like Bill Clinton said, its arithmetic!
The Wiz Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Not a coincidence folks - the Bills are dead in the water until they find one. The confidence of this team has mirrored Fitz so get rid of him now. Browns Jax TN KC Oakland Buffalo Jets (although I think Sanchez is the best of the bunch) Every other team ahead of these has an up an coming rookie or a solid to excellent QB. Draft 7 fckin qbs if you have to next year and fix this shiitbag team once and for all...... New Orleans - solid/excellent QB 1 - 4 Redskins - and and coming rookie 2 - 3 Panthers - up and coming rookie 1 - 4 Why aren't these teams listed since they are actually playing just as bad/worse football?
ny33 Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Not a coincidence folks - the Bills are dead in the water until they find one. The confidence of this team has mirrored Fitz so get rid of him now. Browns Jax TN KC Oakland Buffalo Jets (although I think Sanchez is the best of the bunch) Every other team ahead of these has an up an coming rookie or a solid to excellent QB. Draft 7 fckin qbs if you have to next year and fix this shiitbag team once and for all...... Locker has the worst offensive line in the league and has a weak receiving corps. He's not as bad as the rest of the bunch. If he were on Cincinnati, he might be as good as Dalton
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 I forgot what wgr person had their theory to spend every draft pick on a QB until we found a franchise QB. It's obviously a radical idea that traditional football wisdom would go against..but after thinkig it over I would support this strategy 100% That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Whoever submitted that as a "strategy" should be muzzled until the world can be sure they'll never speak again. The problems this would cause are so numerous that it's absurd, not the least of which are the lack of surrounding pro talent to give any of them reps to showcase or develop their abilities.
DanInUticaTampa Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 Although taking a qb with every pick is a terrible idea, I think we are at a point where drafting two qbs in the next draft would be a good idea
metzelaars_lives Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 One thing Buddy Nix has done more than previous regimes, at least in the last two drafts, was take the obvious pick. The guy that most prognosticators would have us take in that spot- Dareus, Gilmore, Glenn, Brooks, etc. This as opposed to Whitner over Ngata, Troup over Gronkowski (not Nix's pick). Everyone in the world knows we need to take a QB in the first round next year and I believe we will. And yes, I still believe in Buddy Nix. And you could throw the Bucs in that category as well. They may be the worst team in the NFC right now.
BuffaloBaumer Posted October 10, 2012 Author Posted October 10, 2012 uhmmm thats 7 teams... I still don't think Sanchez is that bad thus listing a 7th. And for those saying this is no great revelation, yes, I know but if there are still any people out there that think other areas of the team can carry you - not anymore. The Bills D is not one of the worst in history, it is one of the worst coached in history. Get a real QB and a real coach and this defense will be fine next year.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted October 10, 2012 Posted October 10, 2012 (edited) Others not mentioned in by The Wiz what's the Packers record? oh yeah 2-3 Look at last years black horse team Detroit @ 1-3 and Tampa Bay @ 1-3. http://espn.go.com/n...am/_/stat/total Total Offense - the Bills ae still in the top half http://espn.go.com/n...osition/defense 2nd from the bottom to NO. Look at the Putrids o still near the bottom (is it 2 or 3 years running) 6th worse - it aint true Edited October 10, 2012 by BillsFan-4-Ever
Recommended Posts