Damond Talbot Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Nigel Bradham had a great game last week and was all over the field. He finished with more tackles than Barnett. We need someone who can drop in coverage and that is what Bradham brings. Moats was getting cooked in coverage, which sucks cause I love Arthur. We need a win though, and this could help us, what do you guys think? Good move? http://nomorelinks.com/uncategorized/nigel-bradham-is-expected-to-replace-arthur-moats-in-buffalo/
outsidethebox Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Great move! He plays with passion. something this defense lacks.
K-9 Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 It was never fair to Moats to put him in ANY kind of pass coverage, especially man. Bradham played with heart but made a bunch of mental mistakes as well. I'm willing to live with those if he can show progression. I'm all for the move. GO BILLS!!!
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Now is the time to play the kids, get them reps, and see if they're part of the solution.
Spillered The Beans Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Now I would also like to see Morrison replace Sheppard
metzelaars_lives Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Nigel Bradham had a great game last week and was all over the field. He finished with more tackles than Barnett. We need someone who can drop in coverage and that is what Bradham brings. Moats was getting cooked in coverage, which sucks cause I love Arthur. We need a win though, and this could help us, what do you guys think? Good move? http://nomorelinks....ats-in-buffalo/ 2 things: I hope you're right And where in the world are you getting this information from?
Fan in Chicago Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Nigel Bradham had a great game last week and was all over the field. He finished with more tackles than Barnett. We need someone who can drop in coverage and that is what Bradham brings. Moats was getting cooked in coverage, which sucks cause I love Arthur. We need a win though, and this could help us, what do you guys think? Good move? http://nomorelinks....ats-in-buffalo/ Where did you hear that the Bills are considering starting Bradham over Moats ? Now is the time to play the kids, get them reps, and see if they're part of the solution. That is what we have been saying for several years and yet here we are.
Captain Hindsight Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 I dont understand why Morrison has been inactive all season
RyanC883 Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Great move by the Bills. Should have happened weeks ago. This coaching staff sucks. They make decisions way too late. No answer at QB. Why bring in Jackson if you don't plan on giving him reps. Fire Gailey NOW .
MyHorseAteTheKid Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 I dont understand why Morrison has been inactive all season Wondering the same thing myself... Give the guy a shot, after the past two weeks, could it get any worse?
vincec Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 2 things: I hope you're right And where in the world are you getting this information from? My exact question. I for one think that Moats could be a real force as an edge pass rusher on blitz situations if utilized properly. If the Jets could get 6 sacks from Aaron Maybin then Moats should be worth at least as many. Never-the-less it would be nice to see what Bradham can do over an entire game.
Buftex Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Well, other than an experience edge, I have seen little from Morrison to make me think he would make the defense much better...but I like his radio show!
Charles Romes Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Its pretty scary when the organization promotes the "fans choice" as part of a PR move. Another sign that this is beyond the point of control.
SUNTANBILLSFAN Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 He just crossed the Moats. He just crossed the Moats. Ahhh remember when we used to have Moats rush the passer he was pretty good at that but hey our front 4 will get pressure. Ever watch great teams they use the front 4 to open holes for blitzing LB and backs sigh but hey we dont need that
mountainwampus Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 As soon as Bradham made his first tackle, I was like, "whoa, who the hell was that? We don't have LBs that hit like that! Oh, Bradham..." He puts WAY more into his tackles than any other defender on the team. I was high on Moats, but he's getting killed out there. I'm glad the coaches have enough sense to make the change. I'd also like to see Morrison come in for Shep and Delano Howell needs to play. Byrd has never looked worse. Wilson too. Our safeties used to be good, but they look like utter garbage lately. Also, the entire D-line minus KW....
Damond Talbot Posted October 9, 2012 Author Posted October 9, 2012 Actually Joe B is talking about it now for WGR
marauderswr80 Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 Guess someone built a bridge over the moats noone wanted to cross....i like nigel better!
CardinalScotts Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 good move now who replaces Barnett or atleast play Searcy for George BEFORE another guy runs by him in the 1st quarter of the game
Marv's Neighbor Posted October 9, 2012 Posted October 9, 2012 A guy named Nigel may help us sell more tickets in Canada, Now if we could come up with a Dougie or a Gordie we'd be set!
Recommended Posts