Marv's Neighbor Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 It's the Jedi Mind F*** again! He obviously missed our Jets game.
Captain Hindsight Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Since the Jets game our team has looked damn near explosive at times and has stopped the run. This is a winnable game for us. The fact its in Buffalo makes me more confident
apuszczalowski Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 I see this as more of a "Fan Tantrum" type thing from TB. Its similar to what went on here after the jets game, Bills lose badly and everyones going off on how horrible they are and how they are going to get beat against everyone. Its happening now in NE, They are struggling at 1-2 and now everyones saying how horrible they are and are gonna get beat by the Bills, If they win, they will all be talking about how the pats are back and going to now take the division
inkman Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 This must be some kind of reverse Pats* jujube Santeria. I don't like it. Loves me some jujubes.
TPS Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 He's probably doing his part to get them fired up.
IDBillzFan Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 I'd be more optimistic about this game if it were still officiated by the replacement guys who never read their "Protect Brady" memo.
ALLEN1QB Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Its a winnable game. Lets hope they show up ready to play.
Bufcomments Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Kiss of death this was my first thought as well
ColdBlueNorth Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Precisely. Classic reverse jinx. Well played, Bruschi. Yes, it is clearly a classic reverse jinx. Good catch JR, when one lookes close enough one can see the clear Parcel-lian pattern of talking up the Bills as Parcel's did before a certain Superbowl. Belecheat comes from the school of Parcel, and Bruschi has always kneeled at the feet of Belecheat. I will not be fooled and will start Brady in my fantasy league to cancel the reverse jinx - hah!
CodeMonkey Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Apparently he is the only one at ESPN that thinks that way. http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks
phillyrich Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 do we like Bruschi now? Always liked Bruschi. Even though he had enemy colors on, what a fantastic player, and one of the many Parcells draft picks that helped with the early 2000's super bowl run. I have shared my thoughts on the game on another post. But I will share again. If our D Line and O Line (not worried about our O Line really) play to the same level as they did vs Cleveland, I really, really like our chances. Cleveland's O Line is better than the Pat's O Line. Our D Line dismantled the Cleveland O Line. I don't feel the Pat's O Line has nearly enough to contain our front 4. I see this game shaping up as Mario's coming out party. I think Belichick will paly his bet and try to deal with Kyle Williams and Marcel Dareus first. that should lean to one on one blocking vs Mario and Mark Anderson. I like our DE's vs their tackles in this match up, which should in theory lead to blocking help from Gronk, takign Gronk out of the passing game. As said, i like out chances this weekend. Upset special of the week!
truth on hold Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Who cares what he thinks. What the scoreboard says Sunday around 4:30 all that matters.
mchammer Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Apparently he is the only one at ESPN that thinks that way. http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks Funny wasn't Jaworski on WGR radio earlier this week saying he could see the Bills winning this game and now he picks the Patriots?
Big Turk Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Thank you. That OL is a liability right now, and nobody wants to admit it. The Bills, for the first time in a VERY long time, should dominate both lines of scrimmage. The question is whether Belichick's defensive schemes take advantage of Fitz's inconsistency. I really think Buffalo can hold the Pats* offense to <24 pts. I agree. This nonsense about the Pats run D being 7th in the NFL shows how stats can lie, especially early in the year. They played two of the worst running teams in the NFL in Tennessee and Arizona, then got handled by Baltimore, allowing Ray Rice 101 yards on 20 carries. This same Baltimore running game got stuffed by a Cleveland defense we just manhandled, holding Ray Rice to 49 yard on 18 carries while our 3rd string RB gashed them for 91 yards on 20 carries. Make no mistake, our OLine is going to maul that Patriot DLine...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted September 28, 2012 Author Posted September 28, 2012 Funny wasn't Jaworski on WGR radio earlier this week saying he could see the Bills winning this game and now he picks the Patriots? He said 'could', not 'did'.
FLutieFLakesPLZnoOJ Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Apparently he is the only one at ESPN that thinks that way. http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks whew...That makes Me feel ALOT better...Tedy is not being bias is shocking and hes right..31-28 BILLS!
boyst Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 I do not know where to put it other then this thread. Maybe someone can decide if it is worth its own thread... When I watch Bills football I am hardly critical. I would usually rather just cheer (sometimes its hard to do!). When I watch other teams I usually study them. Watching the Patriots I know exactly what I would do against their offense. I would not rush all 4 DL. I really thought we had something special dropping Anderson back and as long as he is playing the weak side it is fine. If we stack an LB over the DE who is going to chip Gronk then the LB can clean up the rest, and come in for pressure. Bryan Scott on the field to take care of Gronk and seam routes will force Gronk to get in to space outside which will disrupt the timing for Brady to get him the ball. With Anderson dropping in to the flat and still rushing 4 we have an athletic DE able to clear space, stop any screens, and keep an eye on the backfield effectively becoming a rover LB. On short yardage plays I would use the DL to wall the line and stop any run, the MLB holds his position reads on the RB's and anyone in motion. Scott, who will likely be seeing a lot of playing time, keys in on Brady. Force the Patriots to go long on short yardage plays and do not get beat deep. Average downs are passing downs in their offense. Make them throw long, slow them down at the line jamming them giving precious time to our DL to get deep, get their hands up, and block the lanes Brady needs. We do not need to hit him every play but we need to block his lanes. His frustration can get out of hand, and him checking down more and more frequently is proof that there are problems on that offense.
Mark Vader Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Apparently he is the only one at ESPN that thinks that way. http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks We have yet to see what "The Swami" says.
judman Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 I think the production team at ESPN made him do it. Despite his kicking and screaming, he did just so he can tout some sort of objectivity. Although he did not look too objective last year when he was rooting them on from Robert Kraft's box during a playoff game.
BuffBill Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 http://espn.go.com/b...ngland-patriots I think he wants to be a coach and they won't hire him, so this is his chance to prove he can motivate them from afar.
Recommended Posts