Rockinon Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 http://bostonglobe.c...gNdJ/story.html His scheme doesn't call for blitzes. He's got to get pressure from the front 4 as many others have pointed out. Not true. I have seen a couple of blitzes by Shep and an occasional CB. Not often. Only a couple of times but they do seem to do it when you least expect it. They will blitz. Just not often. I say we rush 10 and drop 5 into coverage. If they still had the replacement refs we could get away with it. Darn NFL they ruin all my great ideas! That's 15 guys on the field and a penalty.
MikeSpeed Posted September 28, 2012 Posted September 28, 2012 Not true. I have seen a couple of blitzes by Shep and an occasional CB. Not often. Only a couple of times but they do seem to do it when you least expect it. They will blitz. Just not often. That's 15 guys on the field and a penalty. Not if the replacement refs were still being used.
Overseas Bills Fan Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 If the Bills get close to him, it will be 15 yards for "roughing the Brady."
John from Riverside Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 Its a pretty well known fact that bringing consistant blitz packages against Brady allows him to kill you..... He is too good.....too fast on the release.....too accurate..... You gotta mix it up.....and as a base defense you have to be able to get pressure SPECIFICALLY UP THE MIDDLE PRESSURE.....Brady doenst like it when he doesnt have a pocket to step up into...... By the way....Gilmore was a beast in college when it came to the corner blitz
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 (edited) Its a pretty well known fact that bringing consistant blitz packages against Brady allows him to kill you..... He is too good.....too fast on the release.....too accurate..... You gotta mix it up.....and as a base defense you have to be able to get pressure SPECIFICALLY UP THE MIDDLE PRESSURE.....Brady doenst like it when he doesnt have a pocket to step up into...... By the way....Gilmore was a beast in college when it came to the corner blitz Not quite. Beating Brady is a mater of making him uncomfortable in the pocket sending no more than your base 3 or 4 rushers. Brady has the fastest release in the game, and if you blitz him consistently he will eat you alive underneath on his hot reads. Blitzes against Brady must be rare, well timed, and well concealed (he varies his snap count religiously and frequently uses hard counts to flush out blitz packages) if he knows they're coming it's like playing the game on "easy". Edited September 29, 2012 by TakeYouToTasker
vincec Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 (edited) Wannstadt has never believed in heavy blitzing. He's said numerous times in his career that he believes the best teams and best QBs will beat the blitz more often than not... and that those are the teams you will have to beat to win championships. His pass defense is old school. You a) take away the QBs first read by tight press coverage or by confusing him at the LOS and then b) the DL gets pressure on the QB before he can get to his second or third reads. You keep 7 in coverage so that you don't give up big plays. Whether it can work in today's NFL, with the OLs allowed to hold and with so many spread offenses that try to limit the amount of disguise a defense can throw at the QB, this season must tell. Edited September 29, 2012 by vincec
NoSaint Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 Unless Brady gets hurt or NE* is winning by 50, why in the hell would you put in Mallet? The team is 1-2, its especially not time for them to get cute and bench their beloved QB He's tall, has a big arm, and knows our D from college. duh.
Pirate Angel Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 Kelvin Sheppard is the most obvious choice for this. He's so fast. DB's however don't have much experience at it McKelvin I can see letting go. Brady must be touched up for Buffalo to have a chance. :Lets not forget Moats...a Favre hit on Brady would be sweet!!!
t317 Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 He's much more likely to suffer a turf burn on his labia. GO BILLS!!! Hahahaha. Maybe that's a new one for belicheat on his injury reports... LIMITED IN PRACTICE Tom Brady Labial turf burn
NewEra Posted September 29, 2012 Posted September 29, 2012 In the Super Bowl, the Giants had success by rushing three or four guys, and dropping the rest back into coverage. Brady had nowhere to throw the ball! If you're going to use a strategy like that, you have to have your DBs play tight coverage. That's the #1 thing required to make that strategy work; and the one thing without which it cannot possibly work. Brady will destroy you if you play soft coverage in a scheme like that. (Much like Sanchez did to us a few weeks ago. Except that what Brady would do to us would be worse than what Sanchez did.) Take away anywhere for Brady to throw the ball. Then rely on your front four to generate a good pass rush. If you want to confuse the offense, have the DL do a lot of stunts; and do some sneaky things with some of the guys in coverage. A strategy like that can contain the Patriots' offense, at least if you have the right players in place to execute it. I think the Bills have a pretty good bunch in place, though I'm still a bit nervous about the pass coverage. I'm not advocating blitzing all day, I just think that mixing in the blitz (more often than vs the jets) will put the Pats play caller under more pressure. When you do the same thing over and over on defense it's to the advantage of the offense because they know what's coming. If we're able to shut them down rushing 3-4 guys all day, I'll be surprised. The jets we able to nullify our pass rush by giving the Oline help with the TE and Rbs. It didn't help that we were playing off man (something ill never understand, especially vs Sanchez). If we're going to rush 3-4 vs Brady, we better be playing tight coverage and our help defenders better be on their game. I'm just not confidant that our LBs are able to be consistent enough over the entire game to give the CBs the support they need. Only time will tell.
Fan in San Diego Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Kind of a conundrum. Brady is excellent at picking apart blitz schemes but he also is human and will get rattled with pressure. I'm not sure how much the Bills will blitz but I expect them to stunt a lot more than they have in the first three weeks. Maybe Wanny has saved the blitz scheme's for this game. didn't want to give Marcia tape on our blitz packages.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Maybe Wanny has saved the blitz scheme's for this game. didn't want to give Marcia tape on our blitz packages. Maybe.
KGUN34 Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 This is the type of game why the Bills have groomed Bryan Scott into a nickle linebacker.If all goes to plan the front four will get enough pressure to keep enough bodies in coverage.Scott will be tested today against the NE TE's.That is unless they are in as pass protection all game.Tough game as usual. Go Bills!!
Wayne Cubed Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Its a pretty well known fact that bringing consistant blitz packages against Brady allows him to kill you..... He is too good.....too fast on the release.....too accurate..... You gotta mix it up.....and as a base defense you have to be able to get pressure SPECIFICALLY UP THE MIDDLE PRESSURE.....Brady doenst like it when he doesnt have a pocket to step up into...... By the way....Gilmore was a beast in college when it came to the corner blitz I agree with this statement, BUT... Brady was good at picking apart blitz packages when his OL was amazing. Yes he is good at identifying the blitz, but the second part of that coin is the Pats* OL was really good at picking up the blitz. Its been pretty obvious that the Pats* OL isn't nearly as good as they used to be, therefore it stands to reason that maybe blitzing Brady now makes perfect sense. If the Bills are able to apply pressure without the blitz, then obviously the Bills don't need to blitz. But maybe this newer Pats* OL needs to be tested and still prove they can pick up the blitz as well as they did in the past.
NewEra Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Like I said. No blitzes = 35 points against and the game isn't over. We aren't the Giants. Realize it. "The giants showed everyone that you beat the pats by rushing 4 and the rest in coverage". They showed us today, we can't do that. We lose. Good job Stache. Way to keep Brady thinking. Good job bringing the heart. Good job getting DOMINATED
Fan in San Diego Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Like I said. No blitzes = 35 points against and the game isn't over. We aren't the Giants. Realize it. "The giants showed everyone that you beat the pats by rushing 4 and the rest in coverage". They showed us today, we can't do that. We lose. Good job Stache. Way to keep Brady thinking. Good job bringing the heart. Good job getting DOMINATED Cant disagree with you.
NewEra Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Where are the guys who said bringing 4 pass rushers is the way to beat the Pats? Worked out well huh? Same defense EVERY play. We totally confused the offense with our different looks......not. Great job. I know I'm eating a dead horse, but we aren't going anywhere against the good offenses if we continue this defensive gameplan. It's bs and it hurts watching it
NewEra Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Where are the guys who said bringing 4 pass rushers is the way to beat the Pats? Worked out well huh? Same defense EVERY play. We totally confused the offense with our different looks......not. Great job. I know I'm eating a dead horse, but we aren't going anywhere against the good offenses if we continue this defensive gameplan. It's bs and it hurts watching it
Wayne Cubed Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 Where are the guys who said bringing 4 pass rushers is the way to beat the Pats? Worked out well huh? Same defense EVERY play. We totally confused the offense with our different looks......not. Great job. I know I'm eating a dead horse, but we aren't going anywhere against the good offenses if we continue this defensive gameplan. It's bs and it hurts watching it I think the argument has and always will be IF you can get pressure with 4 there is no need to blitz. Obviously against Marcia, we didn't even do that, so we should have blitzed.
DFITZ1 Posted September 30, 2012 Posted September 30, 2012 I think the argument has and always will be IF you can get pressure with 4 there is no need to blitz. Obviously against Marcia, we didn't even do that, so we should have blitzed. When NE figured out (or woke up) and started containing our front 4, Wannie's reaction was to keep playing the same scheme while it was getting picked apart. After going up 21-7, we played like a prevent instead of going for the jugular. Not only the front 4, but the coaches let the team and the fans down, with a collossal fail. I wouldn't be surprised if Ol' Man Wilson cans the whole lot of them.
Recommended Posts