3rdnlng Posted October 1, 2012 Author Share Posted October 1, 2012 Just because i don't like her doesn't mean the rest isn't true. my reasons for not liking her are related to everything else i said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 1, 2012 Share Posted October 1, 2012 (edited) Just because i don't like her doesn't mean the rest isn't true. my reasons for not liking her are related to everything else i said. Which is fine, but doesn't even have tangential bearing on her use of the vernacular of the Underground Railroad; which is what we're discussing. I asked you for what evidence you used to form your opinion that she spoke in a litteral sense, defying more than a century of Engligh language traditons. You haven't offered anything other than a list of unrelated reasons why you don't care for her. Edited October 2, 2012 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 Just because i don't like her doesn't mean the rest isn't true. my reasons for not liking her are related to everything else i said. No, the rest isn't true because it's not true.m It doesnt matter what you think of her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 Blah, blah, blah. You ask for me to cry uncle on the basis of your verbosity. Your discussion skills are "all hat and no cattle". It's actually very humorous to see you beg for me to give you the five foot breaking downhill putt that both of us know you can't make. And that, my friend, is PPP in a nutshell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 3, 2012 Author Share Posted October 3, 2012 And that, my friend, is PPP in a nutshell! What, TYTT missing that putt----------every single time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 (edited) What, TYTT missing that putt----------every single time? Biden is the only other person I've ever seen celebrate their own ignorance like this. Edited October 3, 2012 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 3, 2012 Author Share Posted October 3, 2012 Biden is the only other person I've ever seen celebrate their own ignorance like this. John Lewis marching in Selma------literal. Jim Clyburn sitting in jail------literal. Great grandparents were riding that underground Railroad--------just kidding! I don't have a lot of time to play your silly games today so don't expect me to respond to any more canards, you twit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 3, 2012 Share Posted October 3, 2012 I'd prefer if you did. I'm enjoying laughing at you, and so is everyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2012 Author Share Posted October 4, 2012 I'd prefer if you did. I'm enjoying laughing at you, and so is everyone else. I don't believe you have said anything in this thread that isn't just an empty attempt at making fun. You have completely lacked any substance. Why didn't you respond to the "meat" of my last post rather than making your post a typical response one would receive from a teenage girl? I refute your unsubstantiated contention and inform you that I'm too busy at the time to get into a discussion with you based on who is having the heavier period, and you choose to respond to the fact that I don't have the time to play games with you? Why didn't you respond to how I refuted you? TakeYouToTasker---what a joke of a name for you. You should try---FeeblePotshotsFromUnderTheBridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 I don't believe you have said anything in this thread that isn't just an empty attempt at making fun. You have completely lacked any substance. Why didn't you respond to the "meat" of my last post rather than making your post a typical response one would receive from a teenage girl? I refute your unsubstantiated contention and inform you that I'm too busy at the time to get into a discussion with you based on who is having the heavier period, and you choose to respond to the fact that I don't have the time to play games with you? Why didn't you respond to how I refuted you? TakeYouToTasker---what a joke of a name for you. You should try---FeeblePotshotsFromUnderTheBridge. Wow. You believe he's actually under a bridge taking feeble potshots? You're even more clueless than Michelle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsidethebox Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 He hates her because she is black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2012 Author Share Posted October 4, 2012 Wow. You believe he's actually under a bridge taking feeble potshots? You're even more clueless than Michelle... I believe that you and a couple of others made a somewhat legitimate attempt to refute what I said----at first. TYTT never even made that attempt. Nobody has refuted what I stated in post # 47. TYTT deliberately avoided it. Even you ignored it in order to take a cheap shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 I believe that you and a couple of others made a somewhat legitimate attempt to refute what I said----at first. TYTT never even made that attempt. Nobody has refuted what I stated in post # 47. TYTT deliberately avoided it. Even you ignored it in order to take a cheap shot. "Somewhat" legitimate? You don't know what you're talking about, several people call you out on it, and days after being shown to be a total moron you start to admit that you were "somewhat" wrong. And I ignored post #47 because, whatever it was, it was a weak attempt to change the subject and distract from your original post, in which you were completely !@#$ing wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2012 Author Share Posted October 4, 2012 "Somewhat" legitimate? You don't know what you're talking about, several people call you out on it, and days after being shown to be a total moron you start to admit that you were "somewhat" wrong. And I ignored post #47 because, whatever it was, it was a weak attempt to change the subject and distract from your original post, in which you were completely !@#$ing wrong. Tommy Boy, post number 47 was right out of my OP. So, sure I'm changing the subject. (that's sarcasim) Obviously, you are slipping. I'm a total moron because you say I am? My advice to you, since you used to be legitimate, is read the whole thread, maybe you can get it back. Don't count on TYTT, you used to be better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxrock Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 I'd prefer if you did. I'm enjoying laughing at you, and so is everyone else. Well, no. Not everyone. Just you dumbasses that feel the need to berate, offuscate, and belittle other posters. I mentioned earlier in this thread the fact that she was "Litteral" and supposedly metaphorical not only in the same story, but litteraly in the same sentence. Lukers are laughing at you morons trying to defend her speech that defies history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 Well, no. Not everyone. Just you dumbasses that feel the need to berate, offuscate, and belittle other posters. I mentioned earlier in this thread the fact that she was "Litteral" and supposedly metaphorical not only in the same story, but litteraly in the same sentence. Lukers are laughing at you morons trying to defend her speech that defies history. Yup. That proves it. Hop right on that subway in Biloxi and shoot right up to Boston. I'm sure she was saying it was literally underground too, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2012 Author Share Posted October 4, 2012 Thanks Ox. The a-holes, (and not all of them are always this way) have been on the warpath over this. I have a sneaky suspicion that they would just as soon have this die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 Nope. I'm more than thrilled to have you keep talking. My argument was that you have no interest in being correct; instead prefering to pull out all the stops because you're arrogantly unable to admit to being wrong. I no longer need to work to make that argument because I've outsourced the labor to your stupid ass. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for doing such fine work on my behalf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxrock Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) Yup. That proves it. Hop right on that subway in Biloxi and shoot right up to Boston. I'm sure she was saying it was literally underground too, right? Well, no. See, here's the difference between thinking people and, well, others. See, "underground" in this sense does have a literal meaning of being outside the law. Like an underground economy. So, that works with her literal sentence as written and spoken. Edited October 4, 2012 by Oxrock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 4, 2012 Author Share Posted October 4, 2012 Nope. I'm more than thrilled to have you keep talking. My argument was that you have no interest in being correct; instead prefering to pull out all the stops because you're arrogantly unable to admit to being wrong. I no longer need to work to make that argument because I've outsourced the labor to your stupid ass. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for doing such fine work on my behalf. So, since I don't agree with you that I am wrong, I'm arrogant? Once again, when are you going to refute the meat of my contention? All you are doing is playing little girl games. How pathetic you are. I'm doing such "fine work on your behalf"? What have you said in this thread that has any meaning? You argue like a little girl. You have no substance, but plenty of little girl invective. You really should show up with something substantial, or just shut up. If I cared, I'd be embarrassed for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts