ubkev Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 good to see the refs screw up basic physics
MDH Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 How was the ball thrown forward if it didn't slip out as his hand started moving forward?
Simon Posted September 23, 2012 Author Posted September 23, 2012 that was a misapplication of the "empty hand" rule. The hand has to be empty from the split second that arm starts coming forward, and it was not.
BringBackFergy Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Ball moved forward. Law of physics.
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Horrible call! No. They got it right.
Dorkington Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Why are we going back to soft pass defense?
truth on hold Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Come on D step up. This could be a momentum turner
Simon Posted September 23, 2012 Author Posted September 23, 2012 The Wannstedt Cushion is back. Swell......
Bills!Win! Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Why is it that the browns can review a fumble that was called incomplete, but the bills can't review a fumble that was called no fumble? That's incredibly stupid.
Roc Bronson Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Spiller hurt, a turnover, could this be the beginning of a meltdown lol.
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 C'mon stache... Press coverage...
DC Grid Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Spiller must have a broken collar bone....for those who think it could be anything less you obviously have forgotten that God hates the Bills.
GoBills! Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Why is it that the browns can review a fumble that was called incomplete, but the bills can't review a fumble that was called no fumble? That's incredibly stupid. Because the refs were found selling shoes at footlocker....they dont know the game just know which cleats the guys should wear...
SACTOBILLSFAN Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Why is it that the browns can review a fumble that was called incomplete, but the bills can't review a fumble that was called no fumble? That's incredibly stupid. Though we would have lost that challenge I think you're exactly right.
sven233 Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Why is it that the browns can review a fumble that was called incomplete, but the bills can't review a fumble that was called no fumble? That's incredibly stupid. I know.....completely lame. Yeah, it may be the rule, but it is absolutley awful.......
Dorkington Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Spiller must have a broken collar bone....for those who think it could be anything less you obviously have forgotten that God hates the Bills.
TakeYouToTasker Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 This defense is just plain old fun to watch.
KOKBILLS Posted September 23, 2012 Posted September 23, 2012 Spiller must have a broken collar bone....for those who think it could be anything less you obviously have forgotten that God hates the Bills. This ^^^ times one million...
Recommended Posts