Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/23/2012 at 12:45 PM, Joe_the_6_pack said:

Jackson for welker?

 

Hell freaking no. We really want to face Fred twice a year? The Pats* would be damn near unstoppable.

 

Welker is a really good player, but he doesn't carry nearly the impact of FredEx.

 

Of course, that's just my opinion.

Posted (edited)
  On 9/23/2012 at 12:45 PM, Joe_the_6_pack said:

Jackson for welker?

 

Brilliant. Pats* have no running attack, so let's give them one of the best in the NFL. :doh:

 

PTR

Edited by PromoTheRobot
Posted
  On 9/23/2012 at 1:03 PM, eball said:

 

 

Hell freaking no. We really want to face Fred twice a year? The Pats* would be damn near unstoppable.

 

Welker is a really good player, but he doesn't carry nearly the impact of FredEx.

 

Of course, that's just my opinion.

What better way to counter the pass rush (bradys onky weakness) than a punishing back that can run up the middle , block and catch screens. Could be another Corey Dillon, who is memory serves me right they haven't won a ring since he left

Posted
  On 9/23/2012 at 2:20 PM, Captain Hindsight said:

 

You cant be serious

 

Fred would be league MVP if he played with Tom terrific

 

Agree the Fred for welker trade would not make sense. Let Freddy tear it up w extra motivation as cjs backup 10 or so runs a game and a few screens

 

Two monster Rb's is a good thing

Posted

Even if they can use FJax for a few snaps, kind of like how the Pats had those wrinkles for Kevin Faulk or Sammy Morris to keep the Pats guessing.

If my picks are either a 75% Fred Jackson or a 100% Choice I'm taking Jackson every time.

Posted

Let's hope he's back. He killed the Pats last year.

 

As for trading him for Welker, no freakin' way. Why give them a great RB in exchange for a guy who will be a thorn in their sides all year long?

×
×
  • Create New...