Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Warp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say

A warp drive would manipulate space-time itself to move a starship, taking advantage of a loophole in the laws of physics that prevent anything from moving faster than light. A concept for a real-life warp drive was suggested in 1994 by Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre; however, subsequent calculations found that such a device would require prohibitive amounts of energy.

Now physicists say that adjustments can be made to the proposed warp drive that would enable it to run on significantly less energy, potentially bringing the idea back from the realm of science fiction into science.

Posted

I don't have a garage. I do have a workshop, however.

 

But it's currently configured for bioweapons production. Not high-energy physics.

 

And getting your lawn mower started.

Posted

A loophole in the laws of physics? That's a new one.

Posted

And getting your lawn mower started.

 

Generator. Lawn mower's fine. Generator's non-functional at the moment...which is too bad, since I need it to run the ball mill and autoclave...

Posted

 

I've always wondered - if you're in your car at night, traveling faster than the speed of light, and you turn your headlights on, what happens?

You can't go faster than the speed of light. As you approach the speed of light you and your car would essentially become a time machine. Time slows down as you reach the speed of light and if anyone could look inside of your car you would be moving in slow motion. So you could essentially bypass every season until we become a contentdor with out aging a bit.

Posted

You can't go faster than the speed of light. As you approach the speed of light you and your car would essentially become a time machine. Time slows down as you reach the speed of light and if anyone could look inside of your car you would be moving in slow motion. So you could essentially bypass every season until we become a contentdor with out aging a bit.

Cool; I'd be up for checking out the 22d century.

Posted

I've always wondered - if you're in your car at night, traveling faster than the speed of light, and you turn your headlights on, what happens?

 

If you were traveling in the daytime in this scenario would you still be in the dark?

Posted

You can't go faster than the speed of light. As you approach the speed of light you and your car would essentially become a time machine. Time slows down as you reach the speed of light and if anyone could look inside of your car you would be moving in slow motion. So you could essentially bypass every season until we become a contentdor with out aging a bit.

Well, kind of. If the Bills could become relevent in the next 20 or even 200 years, it would be like a blip of time to the time traveller. If it takes another 2,000-20,000 years for Ralph to finally pass the reins, that time traveller will age as well. But we'll have the advantage of being dead by the time the Bills are finally relevant again. (And we won't have to suffer through the extra 180-19,980 years to get there.)

Posted

 

You can't go faster than the speed of light. As you approach the speed of light you and your car would essentially become a time machine. Time slows down as you reach the speed of light and if anyone could look inside of your car you would be moving in slow motion. So you could essentially bypass every season until we become a contentdor with out aging a bit.

 

I've always heard that this last bit involving "time travel" w/o aging involved orbiting a black hole (at such an orbit/distance/speed so as to avoid getting sucked in) and then eventually leaving that orbit. The argument holds that the orbiter wouldn't have aged much, but hundreds/thousands of years would have gone by on Earth. It's not time travel as some think of it, but it does get the gist accomplished and while it'd bedamn difficult, will fail with disastrous effect if some little thing goes wrong and is probably a technological impossibility even trying to think. about what kind of technology is yet to come, it is theoretically possible, according to Hawking et al.

Posted

I've always heard that this last bit involving "time travel" w/o aging involved orbiting a black hole (at such an orbit/distance/speed so as to avoid getting sucked in) and then eventually leaving that orbit. The argument holds that the orbiter wouldn't have aged much, but hundreds/thousands of years would have gone by on Earth.

 

Same thing, actually. Those being the same thing (time dilation at speeds close to c/time dilation in a gravitational well) represent a fundamental concept of General Relativity.

Posted

 

 

Seriously, what the !@#$ is up with that dude's hair? He looks like a meteorite just crashed into the back of his head, and hair tsunami is about to crash on his forehead.

 

LoL

 

Of course he is going for the not so subtle "Einstein" look. :-O

×
×
  • Create New...