Simon Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 They have been flat out horrible today. Confusion and delays in games all over the league, bizarre spots from guys who are out of position, phantom calls in nearly every game I've watched, etc The regular NFL refs have had a very good Sunday as I can see pressure starting to mount on the league tomorrow.
Optometric Insight Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 I like how they correct there mistaken calls though. I think the only reason they correct them is because everyone gets together and say what they saw and get the correct call. The regular refs thought they were correct no matter what so they wouldn't bother to get the call right.
Simon Posted September 16, 2012 Author Posted September 16, 2012 Well considering the darlings of the league(Patriots) got screwed on a game winning touchdown today, I would say you are right Simon. They didn't get screwed at all. That was absolutely a legit holding call on the Pats TE right at the point of attack.
Chandemonium Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 Terrible phantom pass interference call in the jets steelers game a few minutes ago.
jrb2590 Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 One of the worst calls I've ever seen chandemonium
Ramius Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 Someone correct me if i am wrong, but ANY injury under 2 minutes (of the half/game) should be a charged timeout, correct? There have been 3 times in the first 2 weeks i've seen officials claim there is no charged timeout for an injury at that point because the clock was stopped. Also, there was a horrendous non-catch call in the NYG-TB game at the end. Freeman hit Williams down the sidelines, he got 2 feet in bounds, had the ball, and was turning to run. He got popped out of bounds, and the ball came out. they ruled it incomplete. In what circle of hell is that not a completion? At worst, it should have been a catch-and-a-fumble, but no way that's incomplete. The refs said he didn't go to the ground with the ball, so that's why it was incomplete. As far as i can tell, the WR and the ball must have a common-law marriage before it is to be ruled a completed pass.
Optometric Insight Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 Someone correct me if i am wrong, but ANY injury under 2 minutes (of the half/game) should be a charged timeout, correct? There have been 3 times in the first 2 weeks i've seen officials claim there is no charged timeout for an injury at that point because the clock was stopped. Also, there was a horrendous non-catch call in the NYG-TB game at the end. Freeman hit Williams down the sidelines, he got 2 feet in bounds, had the ball, and was turning to run. He got popped out of bounds, and the ball came out. they ruled it incomplete. In what circle of hell is that not a completion? At worst, it should have been a catch-and-a-fumble, but no way that's incomplete. The refs said he didn't go to the ground with the ball, so that's why it was incomplete. As far as i can tell, the WR and the ball must have a common-law marriage before it is to be ruled a completed pass. I believe if there was an illegal hit on the injured player, there isn't a timeout called. And the TB-NYG call was awful. Changed the outcome of that game completely.
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 They didn't get screwed at all. That was absolutely a legit holding call on the Pats TE right at the point of attack. I said the same but joe six pack claims it wasn't a hold. I think regular refs let t go because it's pats I like the replacements however challenges ALWAYS seem to stay as ruled on field.
Offside Number 76 Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 Someone correct me if i am wrong, but ANY injury under 2 minutes (of the half/game) should be a charged timeout, correct? There have been 3 times in the first 2 weeks i've seen officials claim there is no charged timeout for an injury at that point because the clock was stopped. Also, there was a horrendous non-catch call in the NYG-TB game at the end. Freeman hit Williams down the sidelines, he got 2 feet in bounds, had the ball, and was turning to run. He got popped out of bounds, and the ball came out. they ruled it incomplete. In what circle of hell is that not a completion? At worst, it should have been a catch-and-a-fumble, but no way that's incomplete. The refs said he didn't go to the ground with the ball, so that's why it was incomplete. As far as i can tell, the WR and the ball must have a common-law marriage before it is to be ruled a completed pass. Technically, yes; realistically, no. I remember Wilfork rolling around in a playoff game against the Colts years ago. No penalty, and he was right in next play. Then again, he always was a cheating !@#$.
Roger Goodell Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 I like how they correct there mistaken calls though. I think the only reason they correct them is because everyone gets together and say what they saw and get the correct call. The regular refs thought they were correct no matter what so they wouldn't bother to get the call right. Thank you for paying attention, you are the kind of fan the NFL appreciates. Some fans seem to think style points and officials' egos are more important than getting the calls right. Also, there was a horrendous non-catch call in the NYG-TB game at the end. Freeman hit Williams down the sidelines, he got 2 feet in bounds, had the ball, and was turning to run. He got popped out of bounds, and the ball came out. they ruled it incomplete. Correct call. The receiver never turned to run but rather was hit by the saftey immediately after the catch. The ball come out as the receiver hit the ground and thus did not complete his football move. The officials have again been outstanding today.
jumbalaya Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 They have been flat out horrible today. Confusion and delays in games all over the league, bizarre spots from guys who are out of position, phantom calls in nearly every game I've watched, etc The regular NFL refs have had a very good Sunday as I can see pressure starting to mount on the league tomorrow. They wre good in week one? What game did you watch? For a group that calls itself a Professional League and tries to give off an air of legitamacy and integrity, you would think they would get professional officials on the field before someone gets hurt.
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 I thought intentional grpunding was a loss of down?? When KC had that called against them ,there was no down loss.
nucci Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 They have trouble spotting the ball and players seems to be taking a few more shots at each other than they normally would.
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted September 16, 2012 Posted September 16, 2012 Seems that they are letting the guys be more physical
billsfan89 Posted September 17, 2012 Posted September 17, 2012 Watching a lot of other NFL games not just the Bills does anyone feel that the Replacement Refs are letting a little more go as far as pass interference, holding, and generally letting the game get a little more physical esp compared to the last two seasons where it seems like they have been trying to limit the physical nature of defense. Although they are still protecting the QB's and calling head hit but I feel like the game is a little more loosely called. Anyone else feel this watching these games.
DC Tom Posted September 17, 2012 Posted September 17, 2012 Watching a lot of other NFL games not just the Bills does anyone feel that the Replacement Refs are letting a little more go as far as pass interference, holding, and generally letting the game get a little more physical esp compared to the last two seasons where it seems like they have been trying to limit the physical nature of defense. Although they are still protecting the QB's and calling head hit but I feel like the game is a little more loosely called. Anyone else feel this watching these games. I'm just happy they're apparently not accepting Bob Kraft's payoffs any more...
BuffaloBillsForever Posted September 17, 2012 Posted September 17, 2012 Watching a lot of other NFL games not just the Bills does anyone feel that the Replacement Refs are letting a little more go as far as pass interference, holding, and generally letting the game get a little more physical esp compared to the last two seasons where it seems like they have been trying to limit the physical nature of defense. Although they are still protecting the QB's and calling head hit but I feel like the game is a little more loosely called. Anyone else feel this watching these games. I've had no real issues with the refs. There not perfect but neither are the "offical NFL refs". You win some, lose some. One thing I do know is NFL refs are replacable.
BuffOrange Posted September 17, 2012 Posted September 17, 2012 I've had no real issues with the refs. There not perfect but neither are the "offical NFL refs". You win some, lose some. One thing I do know is NFL refs are replacable. Agreed. There's always a huge recency bias with stuff like this. The officiating this week was awful because it's fresh in people's minds. There were a ton of bad calls in week 2 last year too.
BillsFan4Life420 Posted September 17, 2012 Posted September 17, 2012 at the game on one of cj runs he ran outta bounds not tackled never hit the ground stayed on his feet but the clock kept running
Mike in Syracuse Posted September 17, 2012 Posted September 17, 2012 (edited) In the Jets/Steelers game they made a TERRIBLE pass interference call and made up for it by not calling the next two blatant pass interferences. The call of the line play, both offensive and defensive has been atrocious. Edited September 17, 2012 by Mike in Syracuse
Recommended Posts