The Poojer Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 wish he was still around making music...glad he was around to make what he had already made..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Britbillsfan Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Agree with you there Pooj. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Hear, hear! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) So glad I got to see him & the band live back in '81. What a performer he was. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEs6NXPwfwA&feature=player_embedded Edited September 5, 2012 by JÂy RÛßeÒ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 One of the best frontmen, ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted September 5, 2012 Author Share Posted September 5, 2012 I saw them in either '80 or '81 and I am also very glad I had the opportunity So glad I got to see him & the band live back in '81. What a performer he was. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEs6NXPwfwA&feature=player_embedded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section122 Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) Always a band I wished I had gotten to see live. When we were teenagers and just introduced to Mary Jane we came across one of my friends parents greatest hits album that and Wayne's world (yeah what about it!) made me a fan. Under Pressure being the hook for ice ice baby didn't hurt either and they were way better than Rush! Edited September 5, 2012 by section122 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 and they were way better than Rush! Now that was uncalled for... Both bands had similar high and low periods in their careers, and also had more success abroad at times than here in the US. Obviously Rush has lasted longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section122 Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 Now that was uncalled for... Both bands had similar high and low periods in their careers, and also had more success abroad at times than here in the US. Obviously Rush has lasted longer. More a reference to the thread about the new rush album. I had to voice my hate for rush in that thread because it kept popping up at the top and I do hate Rush... a lot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWVaBeach Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Saw them at their one and only stop at the Aud in Nov 78. There are some good biopics that I've seen recently on both Mercury and Queen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Dwight Eisenhower would have been 122 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Dwight Eisenhower would have been 122 Bernard Montgomery would have bitched, because it should have been HIS birthday instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Bernard Montgomery would have bitched, because it should have been HIS birthday instead. Monty would have screwed that up too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly McButterpants Posted September 6, 2012 Share Posted September 6, 2012 Saw them at their one and only stop at the Aud in Nov 78. There are some good biopics that I've seen recently on both Mercury and Queen. I was there! Still have the ticket stub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts