Koko78 Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 So are you suggesting that Michelle was insinuating that Romney has not made a difference in people's lives?? Well he did give that one broad cancer as he fired her husband. Pretty sure that had an effect.
truth on hold Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) I gotta say, I think Michelle's speech was the most effective of the night. It's hard for me to gauge what will sway those who don't know (or don't want to know) what I do, but in my estimation of the sensibilities of moderates, I assume her speech had the most impact. It wasn't great, but for a 1st lady speech it was pretty good. I thought she started out strong, starting losing me with the hints at govt regulating company personnel matters, then totally lost me with the "my hubby always does what's right no matter the consequences" BS. Yeah right other than his healthcare agenda he's cut n run and played politics on every other major issue. Edited September 5, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack
Rob's House Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Good lord you of all people I expected to see though this. I got a loan, dad got a loan and here I am on tv with my pink dress! I'm a mom, just like that war mom! I didn't buy it; I just thought it was the most likely to have a positive effect on moderates.
Chef Jim Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Really? it's how a great many people start small businesses and the vast majority buy homes. you've heard of business loans and lines of credit right? ya think romney was ever in a leveraged position? didn't he proudly point out the risks he took in starting bain at the republican convention? why is his risk taking more honorarable than the first lady's father's. Was Romney ever in a leverages position? Are you serious? I think it's safe to say every !@#$ing day. Wealthy investors make money with other people's money all the time.
truth on hold Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 What hotties? Him mom? Daughter? I thought his wife was fairly milfy, and no not his mom or little girl, dumb ass. But there was another looked of age at the other end looked solid. Maybe his sister ?
WorldTraveller Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) I thought his wife was fairly milfy, and no not his mom or little girl, dumb ass. But there was another looked of age at the other end looked solid. Maybe his sister ? Hey, what about Derek jeter. Is he kinda hot this year? Edited September 5, 2012 by WorldTraveller
dayman Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Was very surprised at how they actually called the ACA "Obamacare"...but that fight is over. It's the new N-word it's not going away I guess time to own it hehe. Nice touch telling some stories about ACA but they need to continue to do so.
Jim in Anchorage Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) Really? it's how a great many people start small businesses and the vast majority buy homes. you've heard of business loans and lines of credit right? ya think romney was ever in a leveraged position? didn't he proudly point out the risks he took in starting bain at the republican convention? why is his risk taking more honorarable than the first lady's father's. And what did Michelle do with her leveraged education? Please tell me Edit: I forgot she worked on the Daley campaign. that's real public service. Edited September 5, 2012 by Jim in Anchorage
Rob's House Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Clinton speaks tomorrow. Do you guys think Clinton really wants Obama to win? He has an ad running in VA where he says deregulation & tax cuts "got us into this mess in the first place." He doesn't sound like he believes it, & I thought it was interesting b/c Glass-Steagal was repealed during his Presidency. If Obama loses Hillary arguably has a better shot in '16, Clinton remains the Dem hero as the only Dem since Truman to be elected twice, & Clinton was pissed that Obama pulled the race card on him. So do y'all think he's really pulling for Obama or just staying in the good graces of the party?
dayman Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Clinton absolutely wants Obama to win. Anyone that knows Clinton's policy views for today knows that to be true.
WorldTraveller Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) I think Clinton is more interested in coming off as effective than anything else Edited September 5, 2012 by WorldTraveller
Oxrock Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Hurrah! Home run by Michelle and Casto really were great, I was worried that the evil one might actually win and have a chance to crush average Americans. Romney wants to kill poor Americans and force more middle class people into poverty to make sure the gated communities are even more lush with cash. Fraud is Castros middle namehttp://www.chron.com/news/bizarre/article/San-Antonio-candidate-s-twin-a-parade-stand-in-1953987.php Sent from my iPad
Jim in Anchorage Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Hurrah! Home run by Michelle and Casto really were great, I was worried that the evil one might actually win and have a chance to crush average Americans. Romney wants to kill poor Americans and force more middle class people into poverty to make sure the gated communities are even more lush with cash. I am so glad you started posting here. Such clear, precise, indisputable, fact filled posts. Damn you make good arguments.
/dev/null Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/red-carpet-solyndra-figure-democratic-convention/story?id=17150368&singlePage=true#.UEbeLbV1jU2
Jim in Anchorage Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Clinton speaks tomorrow. Do you guys think Clinton really wants Obama to win? He has an ad running in VA where he says deregulation & tax cuts "got us into this mess in the first place." He doesn't sound like he believes it, & I thought it was interesting b/c Glass-Steagal was repealed during his Presidency. If Obama loses Hillary arguably has a better shot in '16, Clinton remains the Dem hero as the only Dem since Truman to be elected twice, & Clinton was pissed that Obama pulled the race card on him. So do y'all think he's really pulling for Obama or just staying in the good graces of the party? Truman was not elected twice. Won once in 48.
Oxrock Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Truman was not elected twice. Won once in 48. To be fair, I guess, Truman was elected to a second term even though he inherited his first term. Unlike Ford who lost his election to a second term after inheriting his first.
truth on hold Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 I didn't see the "hotties". But if anyone has a link, I'd certainly appreciate it wife http://blog.mysanantonio.com/latinlife/files/legacy/erica.jpg Uniquely talented too, has the ability to appear Asian when hosting Asian dignitaries http://ww1.hdnux.com/photos/11/45/07/2511340/3/628x471.jpg As for the other on the other end who looked hottier, don't know who she was. Would appreciate if someone can find
Jim in Anchorage Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 To be fair, I guess, Truman was elected to a second term even though he inherited his first term. Unlike Ford who lost his election to a second term after inheriting his first. Key word is elected twice as a dem. ELECTED. 2X. In a row.Why not trot out LBJ? 2 term, right?
Oxrock Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 (edited) Key word is elected twice as a dem. ELECTED. 2X. In a row.Why not trot out LBJ? 2 term, right? Sure. Look! Squirrel! http://hotair.com/ar...y-unironically/ I won’t run through the usual litany of misdeeds. If you don’t already know them by heart, you’ll commit them to memory eventually when you finally tire of liberals screeching at you for “hating women” while holding this guy up as a secular saint. (Chappaquiddick material is abundant online, but this post will get you up to speed on another legendary incident.) I’ve got to say, in all sincerity: I appreciate their brazenness in building a convention around the theme of a “war on women” while not only inviting Bill Clinton to be a headline speaker but having a video tribute to Teddy to start things off. They’re all but admitting that their pretense of moral superiority really is just a pose taken for political effect. If John Edwards had walked out onstage to a standing ovation after this clip ended, it would have been one of the most honest moments in recent convention history. Alas, a missed opportunity.The clip was introduced, by the way, by Joseph Kennedy III, who’s looking to replace Barney Frank. At the moment America has no Kennedys in Congress and, well, that simply won’t do in a dynastic country that values hereditary aristocracy like ours does, so good luck with your political career, Joe. Edited September 5, 2012 by Oxrock
The Poojer Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 If its not about how much money you make, how come the democrats care so much about now much money Romney has made? Great speech by Michelle IMO. Pretty much refuted Romney's speech without saying his name. "Success isn't about how much money you make, it's about the difference you make in people's lives." - Mrs. Obama
Recommended Posts