djp14150 Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 For the game of the 53...only 46 can dress (46th being a 3rd QB). That means 7 dont dress for the game.... Which 7 do you think? i guess: 1. QB Jackson 2. LB White 3. RB Choice 4. OT Young 5. CB Brooks (or his roster replacement if on IR) 6 .LB Morrison 7. FS Howell
PaattMaann Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I think it will be RB White and not Choice, other than that it looks pretty spot on to me...
Kelly the Dog Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 Just a guess until we find out more about status of injuries later in the week... 1) Jackson or BSmith is his groin still bothers him 2) Howell 3) McGee 4) Moore 5) Young 6) White 7) choice (it could be Dickerson)
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I think it will be RB White and not Choice, other than that it looks pretty spot on to me... Johnny White was cut, Paatt. He'll be inactive for the Bills on every game.
Optometric Insight Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I know I won't be dressing for the game.
Hapless Bills Fan Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 For the game of the 53...only 46 can dress (46th being a 3rd QB). That means 7 dont dress for the game.... Which 7 do you think? Good question. I think we have to see what the roster looks like next Weds. For example, it's a safe bet Brooks won't be on it, his replacement may be a WR such as Rosie or Hagan who will be active. We dress 46, period - no more emergency QB You guess: >1. QB Jackson (likely inactive, unless Brad Smith can't play) >2. LB White (he was kept for ST. He'll be active) 3. RB Choice 4. OT Young 5. CB Brooks (or his roster replacement if on IR) 6 .LB Morrison 7. FS Howell I would guess: 1. Colin Brown - Urbik is the actual 2nd string center 2. Sam Young - Hairston is the backup at both RT and LT 3. Delano Howell 4. McGee - I think we bring him on slowly, we want him healthy for the Pats 5.Carrington maybe? - Johnson is listed as a DE but he's been playing backup at DT 6. Dickerson, unless Brad Smith can't go then one of the LB, whichever is least of Bradham or Morrison 7. Tarvaris Jackson, unless Brad Smith can't go
Tsaikotic Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 I know I won't be dressing for the game. well at least put on some underware while you sit there in ur chair
fansince88 Posted September 3, 2012 Posted September 3, 2012 uh....why would they dress for the Jets? They are on our roster.
biglukes Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 1) T-Jax or Smith if he isn't healthy enough to go 2) Colin Brown 3) Kyle Moore 4) Dorin Dickerson 5) Sam Young 6) Delano Howell 7) Ron Brooks/ his IR replacement
billsfan89 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 I never understand why they don't just let you dress all 53? 46 players seems kind of small for a professional football team.
DanInUticaTampa Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 I never understand why they don't just let you dress all 53? 46 players seems kind of small for a professional football team. I always wondered that too.
Chandemonium Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 I never understand why they don't just let you dress all 53? 46 players seems kind of small for a professional football team. I believe it's so teams aren't put at too much of a disadvantage due to injuries to guys who can't play but it is short term enough not to go to IR. In other words, If all 53 could dress and team A had 53 healthy players but team B had 5 guys they were waiting for to come back from injury and could therefore only dress 48, Team B would be at a disadvantage.
Green Lightning Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 Morrison will dress. We need all the run stuffers we can muster this week.
bowery4 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 " who doesn't dress for the Jets" the cheerleaders I hope
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 I believe it's so teams aren't put at too much of a disadvantage due to injuries to guys who can't play but it is short term enough not to go to IR. In other words, If all 53 could dress and team A had 53 healthy players but team B had 5 guys they were waiting for to come back from injury and could therefore only dress 48, Team B would be at a disadvantage. ^ Reason #3,442 that the NFL should have minor league affiliates.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 ^ Reason #3,442 that the NFL should have minor league affiliates. Amen to that, a spring league would be awesome and would fill in the time after the season is over. The rule needs to go, any team can get healthy players to fill in the gaps.
ganesh Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 I believe it's so teams aren't put at too much of a disadvantage due to injuries to guys who can't play but it is short term enough not to go to IR. In other words, If all 53 could dress and team A had 53 healthy players but team B had 5 guys they were waiting for to come back from injury and could therefore only dress 48, Team B would be at a disadvantage. Also, if you are inactive for the game, do you still get your full pay check for the game?
biglukes Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 (edited) Also, if you are inactive for the game, do you still get your full pay check for the game? Yes. As long as you're on the active roster or IR, you get your full paycheck. Edited September 4, 2012 by biglukes
Recommended Posts