Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

And if he had fallen and couldn't get up, well that would be surplus gravity.

Technically, I think that would be indefinite gravity which is just about the greatest injustice since f/((m*m)/(r^2)).

Posted

Karl Marx wrote, "The easiest way to turn a nation into a State Run Socialist or Communist country is to first divide the people and redistribute wealth under the guise of equality. This alone will cause the split needed to crush private enterprise and throw a nation into turmoil, everything else will fall into place."

 

Forward!!!

Posted

Technically, I think that would be indefinite gravity which is just about the greatest injustice since f/((m*m)/(r^2)).

 

Newtonian physics is a capitalist conspiracy to enslave gravity - the capitalist uses a fiat coordinate system to confine gravity's action, and then takes all the credit without doing any work. Lagrangian mechanics and the principle of "least action" in arbitrary degrees of freedom is much fairer to gravity.

Posted

Newtonian physics is a capitalist conspiracy to enslave gravity - the capitalist uses a fiat coordinate system to confine gravity's action, and then takes all the credit without doing any work. Lagrangian mechanics and the principle of "least action" in arbitrary degrees of freedom is much fairer to gravity.

 

Don't forget about friction which is a tool of the 1% to rob the masses of all the fruits of their work

Posted

Don't forget about friction which is a tool of the 1% to rob the masses of all the fruits of their work

 

I'm a physicist. I always forget about friction.

Posted

You just don't get it. If I buy $20 worth of metal and make a bike, and I sell that bike for $50, then I own your hammer and thats just plain f#$%ed up, man!

 

ummm, no...

 

Except that's not at all what you said, and one quick look at Wal Mart's balance sheet suggests that's not at all whats occurring. You described capital leverage as buying components of a bike and then selling the bike for more than the cost of its parts. What part of that asinine example sounds like rapid expansion fueled by aggressive levels of debt?

 

no, thats not what i said. the consumer determines the price... yes leverage is debt, which is not what im talking about. im talking about the division of labor...

Posted

No. It's Tom.

 

I can vouch for him that his name is Tom. Looks like Herman !@#$ing Munster, but it is Tom. Throws french fries like a little girl too.

Posted

no, thats not what i said. the consumer determines the price... yes leverage is debt, which is not what im talking about. im talking about the division of labor...

Thats the f#$%ing point! If you're not talking about debt, then don't use the term leverage, which means debt. You don't know what these terms you toss about haphazardly actually mean, which is why you're unfit to discuss anything related to finance or economics. And that may be the least of your problems.

 

Moving back to your original post...

 

yes walmart can outcompete others with access to cheap labor and capital leverage... see small business getting wiped out by walmart all over country you stupid !@#$...

 

What part of that snippet describes division of labor to you? Why on earth did you feel the need to add that worthless line about the consumer setting the price? What relevance does that have to anything we've mentioned? You have absolutely, no clue what you're talking about, I can't stress that enough.

 

You don't even possess the wherewithal to distinguish my posts which blatantly parody your nonsense from serious replies! That's a whole new level of obliviousness.

×
×
  • Create New...