3rdnlng Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Night and day difference between her and Michelle. Positive and uplifting, rather than "all this for a flag"?
dayman Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 (edited) lol 3rd moved by Ann Romney? You care about politicians wives? (btw Ann is perfectly lovely I got no issues just saying) Edited August 29, 2012 by TheNewBills
B-Man Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 It was a great speech, and she handled herself with class. ps: I've already read Christie's speech..........................he's going to be terrific
3rdnlng Posted August 29, 2012 Author Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 2:30 AM, TheNewBills said: lol 3rd moved by Ann Romney? You care about politicians wives? (btw Ann is perfectly lovely I got no issues just saying) Yes, I care about their wives. Tells me something about the candidates judgement.
dayman Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 2:37 AM, 3rdnlng said: Yes, I care about their wives. Tells me something about the candidates judgement. ...so you saw moneyball eh?
3rdnlng Posted August 29, 2012 Author Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 2:38 AM, TheNewBills said: ...so you saw moneyball eh? Mock what you want. That is your only choice here. Ann Romney is a credit ro MItt. Is Michelle a credit to Barack?
dayman Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 2:49 AM, 3rdnlng said: Mock what you want. That is your only choice here. Ann Romney is a credit ro MItt. Is Michelle a credit to Barack? LOL there both great strong women in their own respects I'm sorry you hate Michelle for some reason. Both lovely wives...both irrelevant
truth on hold Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 (edited) Michelle seems like a nice woman. And clearly she's accomplished getting thru Harvard law. She's had a lot if ignorant even racially tinged slander thrown at her and managed to stay above it all. I much prefer her to the cold, spoiled country club wife Anne romney comes across as. Edited August 29, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack
dayman Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 2:52 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: Michelle seems like a nice woman. And clearly she's accomplished getting thru Harvard law. She's had a lot if ignorant even racially tinged slander thrown at her and managed to stay above it all. I much prefer her to the cold, spoiled country club wife Anne romney comes across as. LOL c'mon Ann is fine the point is nobody should be talking about any of these wives like this
3rdnlng Posted August 29, 2012 Author Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 2:52 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: Michelle seems like a nice woman. And clearly she's accomplished getting thru Harvard law. She's had a lot if ignorant even racially tinged slander thrown at her and managed to stay above it all. I much prefer her to the cold, spoiled country club wife Anne romney comes across as. You are so transparent. What's sad (for you) is that you have never looked into things past the left leaning instructions you have been given. Your job has been to pretend to be something you are not and then come out as the former repub, repulsed by the GOP and now in Obamas camp. How can you live with yourself?
dayman Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 3:03 AM, 3rdnlng said: You are so transparent. What's sad (for you) is that you have never looked into things past the left leaning instructions you have been given. Your job has been to pretend to be something you are not and then come out as the former repub, repulsed by the GOP and now in Obamas camp. How can you live with yourself? How can he live with himself? IDK...but did you just start this topic saying night and day difference trying to spark discussion about....wives...
truth on hold Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 "Should" statements are meaningless unless you have the ability to influence a lot of followers. I don't think anyone on the board fits that bill. I actually do know people who factor in candidates wives quite heavily in their decision, so it can matter.
3rdnlng Posted August 29, 2012 Author Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 3:06 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: "Should" statements are meaningless unless you have the ability to influence a lot of followers. I don't think anyone on the board fits that bill. I actually do know people who factor in candidates wives quite heavily in their decision, so it can matter. Yes, candidates wives can end up being a judgement on the candidate. I know I should be disqualified for my last wife.
Chef Jim Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 3:18 AM, 3rdnlng said: Yes, candidates wives can end up being a judgement on the candidate. I know I should be disqualified for my last wife. So you're saying the first lady is irrelevant? So the war on women continues.
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 4:22 AM, Chef Jim said: So you're saying the first lady is irrelevant? So the war on women continues. Anyone who believe the first spouse to be irrelevant is a complete fool. The modern presidency represents the ultimate in global power couples. We currently have a former first lady serving as the Secretary of State for Pete's sake.
Chef Jim Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 On 8/29/2012 at 4:22 AM, Chef Jim said: So you're saying the first lady is irrelevant? So the war on women continues. Sorry this was supposed to be a response to TheNewBills.
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 id bang ann romney... i would! really!
Keukasmallies Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Yeah, the first lady is irrelevant...much as the first husband should be irrelevant when the President is female.
erynthered Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Even though I'm an idiot, i thought ann romney was wooden and insincere. /bird dog /
Dorkington Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I'll take the couple who made themselves, vs the couple born with silver spoons in their mouths.
Recommended Posts