cbmarley Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I agree keeping Potter makes sense, and would like to see the Bills do it. I think field position is very important to both sides of the ball. I don't know how accurate he is (hopefully something he's also working/improving on), but say the Bills have to kick a 65 yard field goal or something crazy like that, maybe he proves to be a better option than Lindell...then again maybe not. Also if Lindell goes down with another injury in the middle of a game, does having potter make more sense than having moorman kicking field goals/extra points??
Meark Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 (edited) I don't even want to read any responses.. This is totally ridiculous.. Can't the dude kick field goals? Can't we find a guy that can do both? What a waste of a roster spot.. Seriously a joke to even consider keeping three kickers.. If Lindell can't get both jobs done find someone who can. Every other team in the NFL seems to have 1 guy that can kick off and kick field goals.. Oh.. and I don't care to keep Martin either.. Edited August 22, 2012 by MarkinSanDiego
Mike in Syracuse Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I hate to quote Greg Williams but he may have said it best. "Special teams is 33% of the game". If you've got a guy on your team that boots the ball into the first row on the kickoffs is also saves a TON of wear and tear on your guys who play special teams. Anyone remember Kevin Everett? He might be our starting TE if it wasn't for one unfortunately kick-off.
Doc Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I hate to quote Greg Williams but he may have said it best. "Special teams is 33% of the game". If you've got a guy on your team that boots the ball into the first row on the kickoffs is also saves a TON of wear and tear on your guys who play special teams. Anyone remember Kevin Everett? He might be our starting TE if it wasn't for one unfortunately kick-off. With a guy like Potter, HomeJob ThrowUp never happens.
Charles Romes Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Sometimes its only a matter of time (and having the opportunity to do nothing but practice kicking for 10 hours a day) for a kicker to develop into an NFL ready FG kicker. Potter may not be ready to take over FG kicking right now. But another possible plus to keeping him is that we may be developing the team's FG kicker for the next decade.
cbmarley Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 With a guy like Potter, HomeJob ThrowUp never happens. great reason to have potter on the team. If people have issues with having two kickers on the team, why not get a center who can act as a long snapper? I believe the answer is because both players bring a unique skill set that helps the team win. A second kicker taking up a roster spot who can more or less eliminate kickoff returns I believe is just as valuable, if not more valuable than a DLmen who plays 3-5 snaps a game, or anyother position for that matter
swnybillsfan Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Sometimes its only a matter of time (and having the opportunity to do nothing but practice kicking for 10 hours a day) for a kicker to develop into an NFL ready FG kicker. Potter may not be ready to take over FG kicking right now. But another possible plus to keeping him is that we may be developing the team's FG kicker for the next decade. this is a pretty legitimate arguement right here. plus, having him learn from lindell is a good thing imo.
ThurmasThoman Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 i think for the section of the fanbase that is against keeping a kickoff specialist - imagine it like this: let's say we signed an unheard of free agent that could ONLY play special teams - he was a gunner. and with his signing, came the guarantee that he would FLY down the field at a rate of speed you had never seen before, and tackle every, single return man at the 20 yard line. they would get absolutely no further than the 20 yard line. you would certainly be for keeping that player, no? just because he's a kicker, don't undervalue his importance to this team. with our d-line, in our stadium (with the majority of our second half schedule being at home,) and our running game? im all for teams starting every drive at the 20. that's going to be absolutely DAUNTING. imagine sanchez throwing into the wind, down by 14 to start the fourth quarter,week 17, wild card spot on the line... and potter f*cking drills it through the endzone so they have to start on the 20. this season is going to be so much fun, i cant wait.
BillsBytheBay Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I don't know--a bit torn on this one. With the kickoff line pushed up, shouldn't every starting NFL kicker be able to boom touchbacks on a regular basis? Lindell can drill a 53 yard FG, but he can't be counted on to kick touchbacks? If it were that easy, everyone would have one.
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Someone made a good point about November and December weather in Buffalo. Lindell is a great precision guy, but the new rules make the most effective kickoff technique to kick it back through the endzone. Lindell is able to drop it within the ten, but while that would have once been effective, now, not so much. To me, nothing has cemented tne importance of having a second kicker in the wings than the godawful attempts we saw last year when Lindell went down.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Different technique. Golf is a good analogy here. Think about the guys who can drive the ball extremely far they generally have poor accuracy on shorter shots and the guys who are accurate at short distances don't necessarily boom the ball. It takes a special player (like a Janikowski) to do both. I can see your point. My rebuttal: there are only 32 teams in the NFL. Are there seriously not 32 kickers on the planet that can accurately kick FG's AND hammer home touchbacks 85% of the time? Seems strange that it's such a rare combination--but, like you said, maybe it is.
Captain Hindsight Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Only 46 guys dress each week. So we dont activate a backup corner who wont play anyway, huge loss guys.
FLFan Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 There is great value in what Potter can bring. As someone else has pointed out, Potter also seems to have potential to be our kicker for the next 10 years or more once he learns how to kick FG in the NFL. It will be a very tough choice. The Bills are already going to have to cut some good football players at other positions. This is one less roster spot for a WR, DB, DL, OL, or LB they would like to have for the future. Keeping Potter would be a real luxury.
RealityCheck Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I don't know--a bit torn on this one. With the kickoff line pushed up, shouldn't every starting NFL kicker be able to boom touchbacks on a regular basis? Lindell can drill a 53 yard FG, but he can't be counted on to kick touchbacks? Should and shouldn't are irrelevant. The reality is what the team has responded to and hopefully the gamble works in the regular season. The key to this move is scoring points.
NoSaint Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Only 46 guys dress each week. So we dont activate a backup corner who wont play anyway, huge loss guys. You could argue that he fills the 3rd qb slot and were netting the same depth we have otherwise and b smith is just a wr with gadget potential All said, with him hopefully playing on more than a couple plays a game, hes more valuable than #45 who may never walk on the field
marauderswr80 Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Its simple....you take advantage of everything you can on the field!
uncle flap Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I can see your point. My rebuttal: there are only 32 teams in the NFL. Are there seriously not 32 kickers on the planet that can accurately kick FG's AND hammer home touchbacks 85% of the time? Seems strange that it's such a rare combination--but, like you said, maybe it is. 85% isn't 100%, which seems to be what Potter can deliver. And I realize this isn't a perfect analogy, but one could use that same logic to say, "Well, I know playing Quarterback is tough, but there just has to be 32 guys on the planet than can do it." Plus, as already mentioned, teeing off (literally) vs accurately placing a kick that is being held by someone else who might not have the greatest consistency holding (many variables- the snap, the weather, etc.) while having to kick over a line of oncoming defenders are completely different beasts.
K-9 Posted August 23, 2012 Posted August 23, 2012 (edited) I hate to quote Greg Williams but he may have said it best. "Special teams is 33% of the game". If you've got a guy on your team that boots the ball into the first row on the kickoffs is also saves a TON of wear and tear on your guys who play special teams. Anyone remember Kevin Everett? He might be our starting TE if it wasn't for one unfortunately kick-off. No. I think Yogi Berra said it best when he proclaimed, "90 percent of the game is half mental." GO BILLS!!! Edited August 23, 2012 by K-9
Best Player Available Posted August 23, 2012 Posted August 23, 2012 The Polish cannon in Oakland was and still is a freak of nature. Forget the no return kicks, that dude can still hit 70 yard field goals in warm ups. Judging by some comments here Potter "could learn how to kick field goals with lindell". Is that for real? 85% of non returnable kicks doesn't seem like a situation to burn a roster spot on. This team is still not overly stocked on overall talent IMO. If the guy could hit field goals 45- 50+yards on a consitent basis then cut Lindell. It seems like he needs to develop field goal kicking though. Can he be buried on the practice squad for awhile? What next a punter who can only hit coffin corners on 60 yard punts? So then a team carries two punters? let's find Steve tasker 2.0 and put some fear in the kick returners, instead of carrying a guy for the sole purpose of hitting non returnable kicks 85% of the time.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted August 23, 2012 Posted August 23, 2012 85% isn't 100%, which seems to be what Potter can deliver. And I realize this isn't a perfect analogy, but one could use that same logic to say, "Well, I know playing Quarterback is tough, but there just has to be 32 guys on the planet than can do it." Plus, as already mentioned, teeing off (literally) vs accurately placing a kick that is being held by someone else who might not have the greatest consistency holding (many variables- the snap, the weather, etc.) while having to kick over a line of oncoming defenders are completely different beasts. Part of my argument is actually based on what Lindell himself said. A few years ago he re-upped with the Bills and he basically said (I am paraphrasing), "look, there isn't much of a FA market for kickers. Each team needs only one, and there's enough guys out there that can do this, so most guys are lucky to have a job." I am paraphrasing, of course. Just seems odd to me that these professional kickers can't boom touchbacks, esp with the move of the kick-off line. But apparently that is the case and I am wrong, since the Bills feel they need two guys to do the job. Just seems crazy.
Recommended Posts