Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 602
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:34 AM, TakeYouToTasker said:

He asked what the name of the bill is.

 

Do you know what the Indian name "libtards" means? "Girly-Men with T-bar panties tied in a wad".

 

  On 8/21/2012 at 3:37 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said:

Whole thing would blow over if he came out and clarified he was referring to anal

 

You should quote who you are responding to, if for no other reason than to keep/hope/force you to be honest.

Edited by 3rdnlng
Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:34 AM, The Big Cat said:

First: what he said was so patently ignorant/stupid/offensive this SHOULD dominate the news cycle, ESPECIALLY by 2012 standards (fwiw)

 

Why?

 

  Quote

Second: GOP cheerleaders shouldn't be looking for ways to defuse this by scolding the offended. This was a serious mistake that ought not be dismissed/excused by Repubs. Instead, the GOP should have this ass hat's head on a spike for flubbing so bad as to take the attention off the economy and onto the antiquated social issue abortion--in that arena Repubs will get SLAYED.

 

You sound dumber than the other trolls. Good job.

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:45 AM, 3rdnlng said:

Do you know what the Indian name "libtards" means? "Girly-Men with T-bar panties tied in a wad".

 

 

hehe...is this how we pretend there's a point to asking what the name of the bill is?

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:47 AM, meazza said:

 

 

Why?

 

 

 

You sound dumber than the other trolls. Good job.

 

First answer: touch.chicagotribune.com/#section/524/article/p2p-71894828/

 

Dumb? I could have SWORN this election was the GOP's for the taking so long as it was a referendum on the Econ,y. Why don't you dispute rather than insult?

Posted (edited)

I thought you were at least marginally better than this. I guess I was wrong.

 

Edit: this was in response to TNB.

Edited by 3rdnlng
Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:53 AM, The Big Cat said:

First answer: touch.chicagotribune.com/#section/524/article/p2p-71894828/

 

Dumb? I could have SWORN this election was the GOP's for the taking so long as it was a referendum on the Econ,y. Why don't you dispute rather than insult?

 

You just said that the GOP should not scold the moron who came up with the most asinine statement I've ever heard so the discussion switches to abortion. If that's what you're saying, you're a partisan hack.

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:55 AM, meazza said:

You just said that the GOP should not scold the moron who came up with the most asinine statement I've ever heard so the discussion switches to abortion. If that's what you're saying, you're a partisan hack.

 

Haha

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:55 AM, meazza said:

 

 

You just said that the GOP should not scold the moron who came up with the most asinine statement I've ever heard so the discussion switches to abortion. If that's what you're saying, you're a partisan hack.

 

Well, that's the opposite of what I said.

 

I think my exact words were "the GOP should have this ass hat's head on a spike."

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:58 AM, The Big Cat said:

Well, that's the opposite of what I said.

 

I think my exact words were "the GOP should have this ass hat's head on a spike."

 

  Quote
Second: GOP cheerleaders shouldn't be looking for ways to defuse this by scolding the offended. This was a serious mistake that ought not be dismissed/excused by Repubs. Instead, the GOP should have this ass hat's head on a spike for flubbing so bad as to take the attention off the economy and onto the antiquated social issue abortion--in that arena Repubs will get SLAYED.
Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 4:01 AM, The Big Cat said:

I think we're having a serious communication breakdown here...

 

That happens often with you.

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 4:03 AM, The Big Cat said:

What is it you think I said? I'm making a real attempt at productivity here...

 

On your second comment, you said you want the Repubs to keep focusing on this issue to switch the topic from the economy to abortion so they get slayed.

 

Did you mean something else?

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:55 AM, 3rdnlng said:

I thought you were at least marginally better than this. I guess I was wrong.

 

Edit: this was in response to TNB.

 

LOL what is your point here?

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 4:04 AM, meazza said:

 

 

On your second comment, you said you want the Repubs to keep focusing on this issue to switch the topic from the economy to abortion so they get slayed.

 

Did you mean something else?

 

Haha. Well, I did NOT say I wanted this to stay an issue. I said Repubs should be PISSED that he made it an issue because they're bound to lose on it...

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 4:06 AM, The Big Cat said:

Haha. Well, I did NOT say I wanted this to stay an issue. I said Repubs should be PISSED that he made it an issue because they're bound to lose on it...

 

Ok well I misinterpreted it. My bad.

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 3:55 AM, meazza said:

You just said that the GOP should not scold the moron who came up with the most asinine statement I've ever heard so the discussion switches to abortion. If that's what you're saying, you're a partisan hack.

 

Gee, ya think? It's usually followed by "You just didn't understand me," which is usually followed by "Why don't you define what you think I said so I can show you that it's not what I said when I didn't say what I said that you think I said because it's illogical to suggest not suggesting I said what I didn't say when I said it the first time."

 

It's all he can do. It's his schtick.

Posted
  On 8/21/2012 at 4:04 AM, TheNewBills said:

 

 

LOL what is your point here?

 

It had to do with the name of the bill and how many Congressmen supported it. Other than that, how many wins this year, not counting Romney?

×
×
  • Create New...