Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

He is the one piece on the oline im worried about. A few false start penalties this season make me wonder how quick he is, does he feel he needs a jump to stay with faster rushers?

 

Rookies tend to take those penalties while adjusting to the speed of the NFL. He's been better than I expected, but he's still a rookie.

Posted

I should not make snap judgments after one replay. When I see Glenn get beat badly on a run play I assume he is sucking. But looking at the entire Vikes game he did pretty well. He will have bad plays.

 

PTR

Posted

I think he looks ok at LT. I think the pick was still great, because even if he doesn't work out at LT, I'm sure he will be able to play RT or guard. I can't complain using high picks on the offensive line.

Posted

For the second week in a row, Glenn looked real good.

 

And while they never showed a replay, the live video of his supposed holding call looked like a ticky tack call IMO.

 

With these officials, I would second guess all penalties

Posted

The kid looks pretty good,just think how much he will progress as the season goes on.

 

I was real happy with the pick on draft day,maybe happier now.

Posted

There should be no second guessing this pick. Offensive and Defensive lines are where good teams start from, and without which other talent will not succeed. Even if he is merely good, or average, a 2nd round pick on a LT who can start in the NFL is a good deal. Not to mention - as someone else has - we have Hairston, who played good enough at LT a year ago. These guys will get better, too. So, the overall picture is a Bills O-line with a LOT of young talent. That will make being a contender, and staying one, over the next 4 or 5 years, easier.

 

Keep in mind - Hairston started sufficiently well last year. Our front office thinks Glenn is better than Hairston. So - it should equate to having a good LT. Wait and see, I guess, but my money is on Glenn performing well. This staff seems to be able to evaluate college talent much better than in years past. We're passing on guys who other teams snatch up and whiff on, while we're taking guys who look good, that other teams have passed on.

Posted

Wait and see, I guess, but my money is on Glenn performing well. This staff seems to be able to evaluate college talent much better than in years past. We're passing on guys who other teams snatch up and whiff on, while we're taking guys who look good, that other teams have passed on.

 

I've been high on Glenn from the beginning and it seems obvious to me anyways that he's much more talented than Hairston.

 

The Bills evaluators however are not infallible. In the thread on QBs we've passed on, there are some legit questions about some of the recent draft decisions. But yes our evaluators are better than they have been and every team makes a few mistakes each year.

 

The real head-scratching pick for me this year was the Steelers taking Ohio State tackle Mike Adams. The Steelers draft really well but this is a guy who looks like a right tackle at best and the Steelers were trying to make him a left tackle before he got injured.

Posted

Johnathan Martin was taken 1 pick after Cordy Glenn and has been bad but "not God awful"

 

http://www.sun-senti...story?track=rss

 

With the Jets and Dolphins really struggling at the right tacke position the Bills are looking good to take Glenn.

 

I would like to thank the 9 teams drafting in front of us in the 2nd round this past draft for not taking Glenn. I shudder to think whether we would have taken Martin if Glenn was off the board. In all the hoopla leading up to the draft, I was hoping that we don't end with Martin

Posted

I definitely liked Martin, but am very happy with Glenn so far. I think he is a true bright spot from camp and preseason. It's early, but I'm excited about having a legitimate LT. I can't remember the last season we weren't worried about that position.

Posted

Glenn looks competent at LT which for a rookie is really good. I think that he stands to improve a lot with gaining more experience. Even if he washes out at LT I think he can easily be plugged in at RG or RT and be pro bowl caliber at either position. I loved the Glenn pick I think he was guy that will be looked at as the absolute steal of the draft. There were two offensive linemen drafted before Glenn in the second round (Amini Silatolu, from Carolina 1 pick earlier, and Mitchell Schwartz by Cleveland 37th overall) and I think that a few years from now those teams are going to wounder why he slid that far into the second round.

Posted

For the second week in a row, Glenn looked real good.

 

And while they never showed a replay, the live video of his supposed holding call looked like a ticky tack call IMO.

This.

Yes, I replayed it a few times. Fitz was in the shotgun. Pears' man - their LDE swung wide and Pears lost control of him. Fitz felt the pressure and he scrambled forward. Meanwhile Jason Allen was doing the same against Glenn. Pears' man fell down and Allen fell backwards onto him, and Glenn - while maintaing contact - fell on top of Allen. It was a chicken **** call IMO.

Posted (edited)

He is the one piece on the oline im worried about. A few false start penalties this season make me wonder how quick he is, does he feel he needs a jump to stay with faster rushers?

 

After 2 games, he probably does. If / when the game slows down for him, he will be fine

Edited by bobblehead
Posted

I would like to thank the 9 teams drafting in front of us in the 2nd round this past draft for not taking Glenn. I shudder to think whether we would have taken Martin if Glenn was off the board. In all the hoopla leading up to the draft, I was hoping that we don't end with Martin

I was not thrilled with anyone not named Kalil or Glenn in the first round as far as potential LT's.

That he fell onto our lap in the second round was and still is amazing. any naysaers are foolish. LT takes time to develop and i consider Glenn ahead of schedule.

Posted

I was not thrilled with anyone not named Kalil or Glenn in the first round as far as potential LT's.

That he fell onto our lap in the second round was and still is amazing. any naysaers are foolish. LT takes time to develop and i consider Glenn ahead of schedule.

 

Am with you 100%. I see a very dull future for Adams and see a lot of shine in Glenns game so far. He has had a couple of false start penalties, but like a few of you have said, it is a faster game and he will need to make adjustments. Any mistakes he has made have been correctable. He'll need to work on bending at the waist so much and get his hips lined up better, but his feet are good and he's managed to keep defenders at bay for the most part. I PVR'd the game and rewound a number of plays to watch individuals. Glenn is not an issue in my eyes.

Posted

Those long arms are a GREAT equalizer until he adjusts to the speed of the game. Orapko was able to use his speed to get by only to have Glenn push him out of the way. I thougt for sure Jarod Allen would give him a proper welcome, but I didn't see it.

 

Now he's going to have moments where we're cussing at the TV and pulling our hair out. I accept that going in as part of the process.

 

But so far so good.

 

GO BILLS!!!

Posted

Miami is making a huge mistake playing Marting at RT. Any word on what MIke Adams is doing in Pittsburgh? I read he injured a knee but don't know much more. The word was he didn't compete hard enough. Doubt Tomlin would draft him if that truly was the case.

×
×
  • Create New...