Chef Jim Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 3:08 PM, Adam said: The fact that people are trying to get laws passed to ban certain types of marriage between live human beings is discriminatory, and in effect, limiting freedom. Now, if a church doesn't want to perform the ceremony, that is 100% perfectly fine. I don't think it's right, and I have just as much right to that opinion and that specific church has to theirs. It doers NOT, however, justify the mistreatment of employees- many of whom disagree with the owner's stance. I don't eat there anymore, because it is very unhealthy, but customer service wasn't the problem- the sense of "I can treat people however I want" that pervades the younger generation of this country is the problem! So by voicing his opinion he's trying to get laws passed to ban certain types of marriages? It's amazing the information people have on people they've never met.
Jauronimo Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 3:39 PM, Chef Jim said: So by voicing his opinion he's trying to get laws passed to ban certain types of marriages? It's amazing the information people have on people they've never met. Its amazing that after months of endless debate and outrage, most people still have no idea what the argument on gay marriage is even about.
TakeYouToTasker Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 3:24 PM, 3rdnlng said: WTF are you talking about, and where did you get this info? Did EiL invade your mind? I believe he means the jackass who videotaped himself abusing the girl at the drive-through was unjustified.
IDBillzFan Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 3:08 PM, Adam said: The fact that people are trying to get laws passed to ban certain types of marriage between live human beings is discriminatory, and in effect, limiting freedom. Now, if a church doesn't want to perform the ceremony, that is 100% perfectly fine. I don't think it's right, and I have just as much right to that opinion and that specific church has to theirs. It doers NOT, however, justify the mistreatment of employees- many of whom disagree with the owner's stance. I don't eat there anymore, because it is very unhealthy, but customer service wasn't the problem- the sense of "I can treat people however I want" that pervades the younger generation of this country is the problem! Can you please let me know the specifics as it relates to the owner of Chic-Fil-A mistreating employees because they disagree with his stand on traditional marriage? I have no idea where you are getting this from and would truly like to see links to references.
KD in CA Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 3:46 PM, Jauronimo said: Its amazing that after months of endless debate and outrage, most people still have no idea what the argument on gay marriage is even about. Being stubborn and refusing to acknowledge that the other side might have any legitimate points?
Rob's House Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 I'm eating at Chick-fil-a right now. There's just something about the way the chicken & bacon intermingle with the tangy hate sauce. Mmm, so good.
Adam Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 (edited) On 8/6/2012 at 3:39 PM, Chef Jim said: So by voicing his opinion he's trying to get laws passed to ban certain types of marriages? It's amazing the information people have on people they've never met. Not him specifically, but there are a lot of people who want the government to interfere in who can and can't get married. On 8/6/2012 at 4:34 PM, Rob said: I'm eating at Chick-fil-a right now. There's just something about the way the chicken & bacon intermingle with the tangy hate sauce. Mmm, so good. Hope you don't eat there every day. Processed chicken product is just as bad for you as processed beef product. Edited August 6, 2012 by Adam
Chef Jim Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 4:36 PM, Adam said: Not him specifically, but there are a lot of people who want the government to interfere in who can and can't get married. So what exactly did you mean when you said the owner wanted to restrict people's freedoms?
Adam Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 4:52 PM, Chef Jim said: So what exactly did you mean when you said the owner wanted to restrict people's freedoms? I probably mean that I should be careful posting, when I am working on something else Not the first time that has happened, probably not the last. There are a lot of people who wrongly want laws passed about this, it should not become a legal issue.
DC Tom Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:05 PM, Adam said: I probably mean that I should be careful posting, when I am working on something else Not the first time that has happened, probably not the last. There are a lot of people who wrongly want laws passed about this, it should not become a legal issue. Defining who can get married and how has always been a legal issue.
Adam Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:13 PM, DC Tom said: Defining who can get married and how has always been a legal issue. The only people who seems to want to ban same-sex marriages seem to be quoting the mythical bible, so I would call it a religous issue, more than legal
3rdnlng Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:15 PM, Adam said: The only people who seems to want to ban same-sex marriages seem to be quoting the mythical bible, so I would call it a religous issue, more than legal The bible is a myth?
Adam Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:23 PM, 3rdnlng said: The bible is a myth? Pretty much- it was written by man and nothing can be proven. Pretty much the equivalent of a fairy tale.
B-Man Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 (edited) On 8/6/2012 at 5:15 PM, Adam said: The only people who seems to want to ban same-sex marriages seem to be quoting the mythical bible, so I would call it a religous issue, more than legal Squishy nonsense Mr. A. The proponents want to change the established law.................it is a legal issue. . Edited August 6, 2012 by B-Man
IDBillzFan Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:24 PM, Adam said: Pretty much- it was written by man and nothing can be proven. Pretty much the equivalent of a fairy tale. And the people who believe that fairy tale are....?
Adam Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 (edited) On 8/6/2012 at 5:28 PM, B-Man said: Squishy nonsense Mr. A. The proponents want to change the established law.................it is a legal issue. . What is the reasoning behind wanting to change it? On 8/6/2012 at 5:29 PM, LABillzFan said: And the people who believe that fairy tale are....? They are fine, as long as they don't inflict those fairy tales on others. Edited August 6, 2012 by Adam
Jauronimo Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:29 PM, LABillzFan said: And the people who believe that fairy tale are....? going to heaven?
Rob's House Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:29 PM, LABillzFan said: And the people who believe that fairy tale are....? Tea Baggers?
Adam Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:31 PM, Rob said: Tea Baggers? I didn't EVER say that. I'd say it is pretty atypical of you to put words in my mouth. People who believe them are neither good, nor bad. That is defined more by how others interpret their actions. And for the record, I have pretty much defended the tea party.
Rob's House Posted August 6, 2012 Posted August 6, 2012 On 8/6/2012 at 5:40 PM, Adam said: I didn't EVER say that. I'd say it is pretty atypical of you to put words in my mouth. People who believe them are neither good, nor bad. That is defined more by how others interpret their actions. And for the record, I have pretty much defended the tea party. Take 'er easy, bub. That's not directed at you; just making fun of Tea bag haters.
Recommended Posts