Adam Posted October 11, 2012 Posted October 11, 2012 This is when it's REALLY nice to be a true independent. Someone cherry-picks a poll showing D with a huge lead, and polls suck. Someone else cherry-picks another poll showing R with a huge lead...and polls still suck. Very true. I believe there is only one accurate poll and it won't be out for a bit.
DC Tom Posted October 12, 2012 Posted October 12, 2012 Yeah but when one side goes overboard with their shilling, it's fun to slap them in the face with the same turd they've been smearing all over the place This is true...
/dev/null Posted October 13, 2012 Posted October 13, 2012 http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/10/poll-romney-leads-obama-in-maine-congressional-district-138207.html Maine
Nanker Posted October 13, 2012 Posted October 13, 2012 Yes, Maine and a few other states are not winner-take-all electoral college votes.
/dev/null Posted October 13, 2012 Posted October 13, 2012 Yes, Maine and a few other states are not winner-take-all electoral college votes. Yes, I know. Maine and Nebraska split their EVs I was just surprised that part of Maine is in play
meazza Posted October 13, 2012 Posted October 13, 2012 Something that isn't **** that comes from the Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-cuban/governor-romney-tax-plan_b_1960967.html
Chef Jim Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Something that isn't **** that comes from the Huffington Post http://www.huffingto..._b_1960967.html Yes but the comments are in true Huffington Post form.
meazza Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Yes but the comments are in true Huffington Post form. Yes the communist post doesn't have the brightest readers.
DC Tom Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Yes the communist post doesn't have the brightest readers. Y'all caught the "business and government are different because business success is based on luck" post, I take it?
meazza Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Y'all caught the "business and government are different because business success is based on luck" post, I take it? Maybe democracy isn't the best system?
DC Tom Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 Maybe democracy isn't the best system? The older I get, the more I think the old "You have to be a property owner to vote" idea had something to it. "Can stand upright and read at a third-grade level" doesn't seem to be cutting it...
VABills Posted October 14, 2012 Posted October 14, 2012 The older I get, the more I think the old "You have to be a property owner to vote" idea had something to it. "Can stand upright and read at a third-grade level" doesn't seem to be cutting it... What? When did handicapped people not get the right to vote? I also believe retards have the ability to vote as well. Hell if this place is any indication, I believe they do it all the time.
B-Man Posted October 15, 2012 Posted October 15, 2012 (edited) “One might have thought that the 2010 mid-term elections . . . would have convinced the Left that they had miscalculated. Instead, they placed their confidence in Obama’s ability to navigate the new environment . . . “Everything seemed to be proceeding in accordance with those beliefs until Romney dismantled Obama in Wednesday’s debate — a psychological shock that has unhinged the Left, causing them to begin lashing out furiously and rather erratically at anyone who suggests that the dam has broken and that the ‘preference cascade’ may doom Obama to defeat in November.” – Robert Stacy McCain , Oct. 6 http://theothermccai...erence-cascade/ . Edited October 15, 2012 by B-Man
IDBillzFan Posted October 15, 2012 Posted October 15, 2012 (edited) Yes but the comments are in true Huffington Post form. I read an article in there earlier from, I think, Howard Fineman, and the premise of the article was "If Obama Loses, Here's What To Blame." The comments section was a cornucopia of batschitt loony liberal dolts. How dare one of their own suggest Obama might lose. And if he does lose, they say, it won't be because of anything Obama did, but rather what the "corporate media" did to make Obama look bad in the first debate. Seriously. Not kidding. Corporate media was responsible for Obama looking bad in that first debate. Edited October 15, 2012 by LABillzFan
Chef Jim Posted October 16, 2012 Posted October 16, 2012 I read an article in there earlier from, I think, Howard Fineman, and the premise of the article was "If Obama Loses, Here's What To Blame." The comments section was a cornucopia of batschitt loony liberal dolts. How dare one of their own suggest Obama might lose. And if he does lose, they say, it won't be because of anything Obama did, but rather what the "corporate media" did to make Obama look bad in the first debate. Seriously. Not kidding. Corporate media was responsible for Obama looking bad in that first debate. Do they have any idea how to take responsibility for anything? Could you imagine if Bain took over some company and Romney spent four years blaming the previous management team for not being able to turn it around?
3rdnlng Posted October 16, 2012 Posted October 16, 2012 Do they have any idea how to take responsibility for anything? Could you imagine if Bain took over some company and Romney spent four years blaming the previous management team for not being able to turn it around? If Romney gets the opportunity tomorrow night this is exactly what he should indicate. Can you picture the look on Obama's face when Romney tells him he didn't have the luxury of blaming his predecessor when he turned companies around? That would be one of those debate moments that people remember.
DC Tom Posted October 16, 2012 Posted October 16, 2012 Seriously. Not kidding. Corporate media was responsible for Obama looking bad in that first debate. Well, yeah. The moderator didn't control the debate, thereby allowing Romney to put Obama on the defensive, making Obama look bad.
/dev/null Posted October 16, 2012 Posted October 16, 2012 Living in Virginia during Election Season I started screening my calls, and for good reason. Had a voicemail of a Robocall yesterday inviting me to a victory rally with Mitt Romney and Lee Greenwood in Chesapeake tomorrow Think I'll pass
/dev/null Posted October 16, 2012 Posted October 16, 2012 Quinnipiac poll shows Romney within 4 in PA. http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/pennsylvania/release-detail?ReleaseID=1807 Strategically this is a double edged sword for Romney. If PA is in play it signals a landslide. But if Team Romney diverts resources from Ohio, Virginia, Florida, etc it may give Team Obama enough of an opening to capture one of those states. Conversely these numbers may be cause for Team Obama to divert resources from swing states to shore up what should be a true blue state.
Recommended Posts