Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 It's called having those people unified under a single political and economic system, unlike Europe. Now, what do you think Mitt will be like as our "Anglo-Saxon" president? http://m.upi.com/story/UPI-62941343199600/ And you would be wrong not surprisingly. The reason is that there are thousands of families moving from the poverty class to a consuming middle class every day in the emerging markets and this has little to do with their political system.
Park Posted July 25, 2012 Author Posted July 25, 2012 And you would be wrong not surprisingly. The reason is that there are thousands of families moving from the poverty class to a consuming middle class every day in the emerging markets and this has little to do with their political system. Little to do with their political system? Have you ever heard or read about the court case Gibbons vs Ogden?
Bigfatbillsfan Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 My guess is that he will take away Medicaid for the poor and use those funds and redistribute it to the wealthy. That's pretty much what he says he'll do. So yeah, why not.
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 Little to do with their political system? Have you ever heard or read about the court case Gibbons vs Ogden? What does a nearly 200 year old USSC case have to do with the growth if the consumer class in the world's emerging markets???
IDBillzFan Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 What does a nearly 200 year old USSC case have to do with the growth if the consumer class in the world's emerging markets??? FREE WILOLA!!!
Rob's House Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 Little to do with their political system? Have you ever heard or read about the court case Gibbons vs Ogden? I'm trying to think of a relevant angle here, because I have read Gibbons v. Ogden, and I'm still not sure what it does to support your theory.
ieatcrayonz Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 I'm trying to think of a relevant angle here, because I have read Gibbons v. Ogden, and I'm still not sure what it does to support your theory. Next try reading "Huckleberry Flynn" then maybe you'll get it.
....lybob Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 It's called having 20 4.3 times more people than we do. Now, what's your explanation? Americans can't do math
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 Americans can't do math Pulling a number out of my ass to make a point has nothing to do with math.
ieatcrayonz Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 Pulling a number out of my ass to make a point has nothing to do with math. 4.3 is an error of .8
3rdnlng Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 Pulling a number out of my ass to make a point has nothing to do with math. It's hyperbole, as long as you don't put quotation marks around it and claim that's what someone else said.
Smears Posted July 25, 2012 Posted July 25, 2012 Romney, if elected, will appear to be an ineffective President Senate Democrats will make the argument that turnabout is fair play and block Romney at every opportunity. Like all new Presidents, Romney will make the customary bipartisan overtones. This will quickly evaporate as Romney pulls a page from the Obama playbook and starts to issue Executive Orders which ironicly will repeal or overturn previous Executive Orders. We have all seen this before, it looks familiar. Seems to be the case every time a new president is sworn into office. Doesnt matter which side the presidents on.........
Recommended Posts