/dev/null Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 We're just better at it. Because we have lasers. You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Would you remind me what we pay Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, and Blackwater for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 It's not an ideology thing, it's a current warfare thing... dropping bombs on brown people for over a decade now.... And yet we still haven't taken out Snooki. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted July 16, 2012 Author Share Posted July 16, 2012 Whats it called when brown people bomb brown people? History? Current affairs? Easy? None of our business Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 None of our business Unless they got sh*t we need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted July 16, 2012 Author Share Posted July 16, 2012 Unless they got sh*t we need. Then it goes from "none of our business" to "stay the f#ck out". History shows the more invoked we are (Korea, Vietnam, Israel/palestIne, Iran) the more f#cked up it gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Then it goes from "none of our business" to "stay the f#ck out". History shows the more invoked we are (Korea, Vietnam, Israel/palestIne, Iran) the more f#cked up it gets. How'd that isolationism work out in the first half of the century? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Then it goes from "none of our business" to "stay the f#ck out". History shows the more invoked we are (Korea, Vietnam, Israel/palestIne, Iran) the more f#cked up it gets. I would suggest that you ask your average Tutsi if we would have !@#$ed up Rwanda more. If you can find one, that is. Of course, Rwandans fall under the "brown people without **** we need." Apparently, "**** we need" is the difference between "genocide" and "genocide-like activities." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I would suggest that you ask your average Tutsi if we would have !@#$ed up Rwanda more. If you can find one, that is. Of course, Rwandans fall under the "brown people without **** we need." Apparently, "**** we need" is the difference between "genocide" and "genocide-like activities." Truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 I would suggest that you ask your average Tutsi if we would have !@#$ed up Rwanda more. If you can find one, that is. Of course, Rwandans fall under the "brown people without **** we need." Apparently, "**** we need" is the difference between "genocide" and "genocide-like activities." Not exactly. Darfur is full of **** we need, but a ruling of genocide stands to inconvenience China, so it will be "genocide-like activities" until they run out of **** we need or people to massacre. Turkey on the other hand, (who provided the blue print for modern genocide) has plenty of **** we need in the form of airspace. So the Armenians are going to have to deal with the title of "genocide-like activities" until this whole peace fest in the middle east blows over. Doesn't "Never Again" just make you feel warm and fuzzy inside? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted July 16, 2012 Author Share Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) I would suggest that you ask your average Tutsi if we would have !@#$ed up Rwanda more. If you can find one, that is. Of course, Rwandans fall under the "brown people without **** we need." Apparently, "**** we need" is the difference between "genocide" and "genocide-like activities." And you ought to give a ringy dingy to the 241 dead marines in a barracks in the middle of lebanons civil war, 3000 + dead American and 250000 dead Iraqi civilians who died for bogus WMDs and so we could retun to them a country even deeper in sectarian violence, or starving north Koreans who can't reconcile with south due to our presence, or 1 million Iranians dead at the hands of our sponsored invasion by saddam, etc etc etc etc. and the 100's of millions from future generations of Americans who will bare the financial burden of our deficit "defense" spending today. Edited July 16, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Not exactly. Darfur is full of **** we need, but a ruling of genocide stands to inconvenience China, so it will be "genocide-like activities" until they run out of **** we need or people to massacre. Turkey on the other hand, (who provided the blue print for modern genocide) has plenty of **** we need in the form of airspace. So the Armenians are going to have to deal with the title of "genocide-like activities" until this whole peace fest in the middle east blows over. Doesn't "Never Again" just make you feel warm and fuzzy inside? Name one thing Darfur has. Just one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 And yet we still haven't taken out Snooki. send a drone... and buy that I don't mean a Jersey Shore fan.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 And you ought to give a ringy dingy to the 241 dead marines in a barracks in the middle of lebanons civil war, 3000 + dead American and 250000 dead Iraqi civilians who died for bogus WMDs and so we could retun to them a country even deeper in sectarian violence, or starving north Koreans who can't reconcile with south due to our presence, or 1 million Iranians dead at the hands of our sponsored invasion by saddam, etc etc etc etc. and the 100's of millions from future generations of Americans who will bare the financial burden of our deficit "defense" spending today. Everything is the US's fault. We're so all-powerful that the Lebanese, Iraqis, Iranians, and Koreans couldn't possibly hate each other on their own. This is what happens when you get your news from Russia Today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 (edited) Name one thing Darfur has. Just one. Oil reserves. And Sudan has a government which is quite friendly to our Chinese financiers. Intervention in Sudan would certainly mean regime change, and that would be bad for business. Edited July 16, 2012 by Jauronimo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 This thread brought to you by British colonialism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 This thread brought to you by British colonialism. So do you have a better way of nation building than the British system of drawing lines on a map because, well, "you all look the f#$%ing same to me!", or are you just here to criticize? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Everything is the US's fault. We're so all-powerful that the Lebanese, Iraqis, Iranians, and Koreans couldn't possibly hate each other on their own. This is what happens when you get your news from Russia Today. The entire Arab spring was started by the CIA, didn't you know? The Arabs can't possibly want democracy on their own, since their dictators are so beloved and benevolent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 So do you have a better way of nation building than the British system of drawing lines on a map because, well, "you all look the f#$%ing same to me!", or are you just here to criticize? Well, I've always been a big fan of the: "It's not your land and you have no just claim to it, so why not go ahead and knock off the whole drawing of lines on a map, as if sectioning off into parcels to divide amongst yourselfs and let the peope who actually live there worry about it." approach because it doesn't seem to cause 400 years of war on atleast 5 continents. To critique your larger point, a better way of nation building would be, "don't". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Well, I've always been a big fan of the: "It's not your land and you have no just claim to it, so why not go ahead and knock off the whole drawing of lines on a map, as if sectioning off into parcels to divide amongst yourselfs and let the peope who actually live there worry about it." approach because it doesn't seem to cause 400 years of war on atleast 5 continents. To critique your larger point, a better way of nation building would be, "don't". I don't know, man. Sounds risky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Name one thing Darfur has. Just one. Support from American celebrites that also throw fund raisers for Obama The entire Arab spring was started by the CIA, didn't you know? The Arabs can't possibly want democracy on their own, since their dictators are so beloved and benevolent. Arab Spring owes more to Russian Wheat shortages and Quantitative Easing than a yearning for Democracy People who live in areas that aren't agriculturally self sufficient get pissed off when food prices spike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts