Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 3:17 PM, shrader said:

Oh great, there's that number again.

 

Did anyone wear 11 between Norwood and Bledsoe?

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 3:13 PM, Captain Hindsight said:

Did he finally end his holdout? That greedy bastard!

I so agree ... why can't the Bills sign their #3 picks before the draft - the reason RALPH is so cheap!

 

We should have drafted GRONK ... BRADY ... and Buddy blew it this year ... WILSON ...

 

Graham was soooo greedy ... who does he think he is ...

 

LMAO ...

 

Well, now we have everyone in camp and let the battles at wideout begin! We enter the preseason with so many potential weapons for a creative coach like Chan! Who wins the Easley-Jones battle? Can Naaman survive the new competition at wide out?

 

GO BILLS!!!

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 5:48 PM, Ennjay said:

Did anyone wear 11 between Norwood and Bledsoe?

<shudder>

 

Only the player whose name shall not be spoken...and who just took another sack.

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 5:52 PM, eball said:

<shudder>

 

Only the player whose name shall not be spoken...and who just took another sack.

 

Flutie would have won that game.

Posted

At the end of the day, there were a lot of 3rd rounders that were later in signing to their respective teams. It has everything to do with how the CBA defined how rookies could be compensated. Early and later picks were much more straight forward. Has nothing to do with this kid's character what so ever.

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 8:16 PM, HOUSE said:

Thanks for your post. I missed that.

 

Not a problem. There's too many people with "jump to conclusions" mats. :wallbash:

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 5:52 PM, eball said:

<shudder>

 

Only the player whose name shall not be spoken...and who just took another sack.

 

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah. Now I remember and I remember why I forgot.

 

Kind of a "Men in Black II" thing. Except now I'm sorry I asked and got deneuralyzed.

Posted (edited)
  On 7/9/2012 at 8:04 PM, Luxy312 said:

At the end of the day, there were a lot of 3rd rounders that were later in signing to their respective teams. It has everything to do with how the CBA defined how rookies could be compensated. Early and later picks were much more straight forward. Has nothing to do with this kid's character what so ever.

Did you hear? He was holding out for more money because he is a greedy bastard who was lucky to be taken in the third round

Edited by Captain Hindsight
Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 5:52 PM, eball said:

<shudder>

 

Only the player whose name shall not be spoken...and who just took another sack.

To make it even worse, he sacked himself.

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 3:13 PM, jimmyo said:

Why did it take so long? What gives this kid the right to have so much swagger? Why is Ralph so cheap? Why is life so hard? Why must I fail in every attempt at masonry?

 

Why do fools fall in love?

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 5:30 PM, JÂy RÛßeÒ said:

championship

 

Haha.. I you beat me to it.. I was like.. wait.. no one posted Championship yet.. what gives.. LOL

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 5:50 PM, shoretalk said:

I so agree ... why can't the Bills sign their #3 picks before the draft - the reason RALPH is so cheap!

 

We should have drafted GRONK ... BRADY ... and Buddy blew it this year ... WILSON ...

 

Graham was soooo greedy ... who does he think he is ...

 

LMAO ...

 

Well, now we have everyone in camp and let the battles at wideout begin! We enter the preseason with so many potential weapons for a creative coach like Chan! Who wins the Easley-Jones battle? Can Naaman survive the new competition at wide out?

 

GO BILLS!!!

i can answer the last question with just two letters. care to guess which ones?

Posted
  On 7/9/2012 at 6:21 PM, Rubes said:

Flutie would have won that game.

He would've made the tackle if he was on special teams but NOOOOOO!!!1! Mr. Philips had to put Christie in the game instead Flutie.

 

That was the real mistake, Christie over Flutie; not Johnson over Flutie. :ph34r:

×
×
  • Create New...