NoSaint Posted July 1, 2012 Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) Vilma is maintaining that mike cerullo (the anonymous source) not only fabricated evidence but also retracted his statements in April. Vilma is pushing for his suspension to be blocked as he claims the league is not acting in good faith. Keeps getting messier. Is the general feeling still that the league is holding back a smoking gun or is there starting to be some questioning out there about what they might actually be hiding? Im hearing rumblings in the media more and more but the public seems slow to question. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/vilma-files-new-lawsuit-against-the-nfl/ Edited July 1, 2012 by NoSaint
DanInUticaTampa Posted July 1, 2012 Posted July 1, 2012 I think there is probably more than cerullos notes and testimony as far as evidence goes. But think the league was pretty foolish to ban vilma for a whole year. Goodwell keeps saying front office and coaches are held up to a higher standard, but why is vilma getting the same one year that payton and loomis are getting? This whole thing with the lawsuits and questioning the evidence might have blown over by now if they just suspended vilma for one or two games
Jerry Jabber Posted July 2, 2012 Posted July 2, 2012 Maybe Vilma donated the most money as a player, or had the most player involvement in the bounty scandal.
Malazan Posted July 2, 2012 Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) The suit is not about Vilma at all. It's an end run by the NFLPA to get at the names of those who talked. Vilma is going to be sore when the NFLPA gets what it wants and leaves him hanging. Edited July 2, 2012 by jeremy2020
NoSaint Posted July 2, 2012 Author Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) The suit is not about Vilma at all. It's an end run by the NFLPA to get at the names of those who talked. Vilma is going to be sore when the NFLPA gets what it wants and leaves him hanging. Mike cerullo is the man who spoke. As of now, there's no indication players spoke minus the Hargrove stuff. Edited July 2, 2012 by NoSaint
justnzane Posted July 2, 2012 Posted July 2, 2012 I think there is probably more than cerullos notes and testimony as far as evidence goes. But think the league was pretty foolish to ban vilma for a whole year. Goodwell keeps saying front office and coaches are held up to a higher standard, but why is vilma getting the same one year that payton and loomis are getting? This whole thing with the lawsuits and questioning the evidence might have blown over by now if they just suspended vilma for one or two games
Malazan Posted July 2, 2012 Posted July 2, 2012 Mike cerullo is the man who spoke. As of now, there's no indication players spoke minus the Hargrove stuff. The NFLPA should have addressed Goodell's authority during the negotiations for the CBA.
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted July 2, 2012 Posted July 2, 2012 !@#$ goddell. we all know what this is really about...
Recommended Posts