whateverdude Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ypdF5Q73Nbo 4 million new jobs.... hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ypdF5Q73Nbo 4 million new jobs.... hahaha Agreed...there is a Hollywood disconnect with reality. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/03/chuck-norris-wisconsin-recall-scott-walker_n_1566338.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Agreed...there is a Hollywood disconnect with reality. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/03/chuck-norris-wisconsin-recall-scott-walker_n_1566338.html Chuck Norris seems to be suffering from the dreaded Hollywood disease where hair gets darker and thicker with age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Agreed...there is a Hollywood disconnect with reality. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/03/chuck-norris-wisconsin-recall-scott-walker_n_1566338.html So, you think it was a bad idea for Wisconsin to get control of their finances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 So, you think it was a bad idea for Wisconsin to get control of their finances? No, I don't think it is a bad idea for anyone to get control of their finances, but at what cost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Hollywood is replete with entitled-types. Hence the draw to liberalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 No, I don't think it is a bad idea for anyone to get control of their finances, but at what cost? Yes what cost exactly? http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/301674 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ypdF5Q73Nbo 4 million new jobs.... hahaha What are they doing? If you're invited over to her house, why is there a raffle involved? It's a stupid raffle not an invitation, right? Why in the heck is the Obama campaign using the quintessential NYC-based elitist actress for his campaign. Is it a bit cynical to suggest that the campaign has such an inferior opinion of woman and think of them being so easily swayed by someone like SJP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 No, I don't think it is a bad idea for anyone to get control of their finances, but at what cost? What? They have to pay 12.5% of their medical now? This is a heavy cost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 I can't see Sarah Jessica Parker without thinking about her character from the outstanding movie "LA Stories." She's the stereotypical bouncy, bubble-headed California chick dating the aging Steve Martin. She takes him to the new trend in California at the time: a high colonic shop. They cut to a scene of them leaving the shop, with SJP bouncing around while Steve Martin walks bow-legged. SJP shouts, "Don't you feel great? Doesn't it just clear your mind?" to which Martin responds, "It was supposed to clear your mind? I think they did mine wrong." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 Yes what cost exactly? http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/301674 That is an excellent article. You should copy and paste the whole article, not just the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 That is an excellent article. You should copy and paste the whole article, not just the link. It's 3 pages... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverdude Posted June 4, 2012 Author Share Posted June 4, 2012 Agreed...there is a Hollywood disconnect with reality. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/03/chuck-norris-wisconsin-recall-scott-walker_n_1566338.html Horse face is lying with a straight face 4 milllllllion jobs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 I can't see Sarah Jessica Parker without thinking about her character from the outstanding movie "LA Stories." She's the stereotypical bouncy, bubble-headed California chick dating the aging Steve Martin. She takes him to the new trend in California at the time: a high colonic shop. ???????? I thought stereotypical bouncy, bubble headed California chicks were good looking. She pretty much missed that part of the stereotype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 ???????? I thought stereotypical bouncy, bubble headed California chicks were good looking. She pretty much missed that part of the stereotype. No shite. Ive always been skeptical of SJP. First thing that always comes to mind when I see her on tv is that she has to be related to someone powerful in Hollywood. No way she gets these parts based on her looks or acting ability alone. She's mediocre to bad on both counts. She's the exact opposite of Charlize Theron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 Hollywood is replete with entitled-types. Hence the draw to liberalism. Clearly you've never worked in Hollywood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 Clearly you've never worked in Hollywood. I was referring to Hollywood stars. There is a huge sense of entitlement with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 I was referring to Hollywood stars. There is a huge sense of entitlement with them. For some, sure. But not for most. There are more conservative leaning stars than people realize. And the real power players in Hollywood, the studio heads, network chiefs, the super agents, they slant hugely to the right. Those are the people that get stuff made and distributed. The notion that all of Hollywood pushes a leftist agenda is factually untrue. It's a nice talking point, but it's not reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 For some, sure. But not for most. There are more conservative leaning stars than people realize. And the real power players in Hollywood, the studio heads, network chiefs, the super agents, they slant hugely to the right. Those are the people that get stuff made and distributed. The notion that all of Hollywood pushes a leftist agenda is factually untrue. It's a nice talking point, but it's not reality. My perception is based on the passion the left-leaning stars display for Dem candidates. I haven't seen that from the right-leaning ones. At least not publicly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted June 5, 2012 Share Posted June 5, 2012 For some, sure. But not for most. There are more conservative leaning stars than people realize. And the real power players in Hollywood, the studio heads, network chiefs, the super agents, they slant hugely to the right. Those are the people that get stuff made and distributed. The notion that all of Hollywood pushes a leftist agenda is factually untrue. It's a nice talking point, but it's not reality. To the right of what? The Kremlin is all I got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts