Jump to content

Blackmon arrested for 2nd DUI


Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8003562/jacksonville-jaguars-rookie-justin-blackmon-arrested-dui

 

Under Oklahoma law, a driver's blood alcohol level must be .15 or higher to be charged with aggravated DUI.

 

It was the second DUI arrest for the former Oklahoma State star, who also was arrested in 2010 in Texas on a misdemeanor DUI charge. He was suspended one game by Oklahoma State as a result of that arrest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8003562/jacksonville-jaguars-rookie-justin-blackmon-arrested-dui

 

Under Oklahoma law, a driver's blood alcohol level must be .15 or higher to be charged with aggravated DUI.

 

It was the second DUI arrest for the former Oklahoma State star, who also was arrested in 2010 in Texas on a misdemeanor DUI charge. He was suspended one game by Oklahoma State as a result of that arrest.

 

 

wow

 

if he had fallen to us I figure we would have taken him

 

messed up, man, messed up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ouch.

 

just proof its hard to say whether any of these guys really cleaned up or just hadnt gotten caught. i remember so many people that were positive of where players off field issues stood going into the draft. he was one that was CLEARLY cleaned up, despite the flag of the past dui (atleast according to board speculation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or has access to a ton of info that we dont.

 

although, did we ever hear he wasnt interested in blackmon?

We know that Nix brought in 2 WR's for a visit. Brian Quick from Appalachian State, who was picked before the Bills pick in the 3rd, and Justin Blackmon.

 

Perhaps they had drinks, and Blackmon finished his before Nix. :flirt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Floyd unlikely to start?

 

Who's ahead of him besides Fitzgerald? Early Doucet?

 

I would have thought he'd be a plug and play guy.

Ken Whisenhunt has rarely started a rookie in Game 1.

He has been having quadriceps problems.

About 30% of SB Nation say he won't start Week 1.

 

Here's a discussion:

http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2012/5/20/3032740/rotb-reader-poll-by-when-will-michael-floyd-become-a-starter-for-the-arizona-cardinals

 

I will bet Michael Floyd will be injured early in the season but will be starting by Week 4.

Edited by Astrobot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Whisenhunt has rarely started a rookie in Game 1.

He has been having quadriceps problems.

About 30% of SB Nation say he won't start Week 1.

 

Here's a discussion:

http://www.revengeof...izona-cardinals

 

I will bet Michael Floyd will be injured early in the season but will be starting by Week 4.

Thanks, Astro!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken Whisenhunt has rarely started a rookie in Game 1.

He has been having quadriceps problems.

About 30% of SB Nation say he won't start Week 1.

 

Here's a discussion:

http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2012/5/20/3032740/rotb-reader-poll-by-when-will-michael-floyd-become-a-starter-for-the-arizona-cardinals

 

I will bet Michael Floyd will be injured early in the season but will be starting by Week 4.

 

 

So one guy's (on SB Nation no less) speculation that Floyd won't start, based purely on some over-broad generalization that Whisenhunt doesn't start rookies, translates to "Floyd unlikely to start"? What a ridiculous statement. I just don't understand what people here have against Michael Floyd. The article you cite as your source, spurious as it is, even admits that Floyd will get a ton of snaps, even if he doesn't start.

 

Why don't you wait to see what Floyd produces before dismissing his career and insinuating that he's a draft bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So one guy's (on SB Nation no less) speculation that Floyd won't start, based purely on some over-broad generalization that Whisenhunt doesn't start rookies, translates to "Floyd unlikely to start"? What a ridiculous statement. I just don't understand what people here have against Michael Floyd. The article you cite as your source, spurious as it is, even admits that Floyd will get a ton of snaps, even if he doesn't start.

 

Why don't you wait to see what Floyd produces before dismissing his career and insinuating that he's a draft bust.

 

Where did Astro "insinuate" Floyd will be a bust?

 

I will bet Michael Floyd will be injured early in the season but will be starting by Week 4.

 

Are you insinuating not starting for the first 3 weeks is grounds for the bust label?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...