Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  udonkey said:
In 11 minutes, you made three replies to your own post.  Perhaps you should allow people the time to respond.  Perhaps they think the topic is worthless.

185240[/snapback]

 

 

Maybe hes a post whore?? :D

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  gantrules said:
Hey JP it's been 20 minutes where is the response????? Geez, must not have a comeback...or could it be you are doing something else?

 

We all have lives outside of the board. Don't act like an ignoramus.

185277[/snapback]

Hey! I called him that last week!

Posted
  JP-era said:
Still waiting for an intelligent response to the FOOTBALL post.

 

Waiting...waiting....waiting...

185079[/snapback]

 

The only thing more tedious than a "LAMP/EAT CROW" post is one in which the composer thinks he puked up some great revelation that we are all REQUIRED to address.

Posted
  stuckincincy said:
Todd Marinovich.

Akili Smith.

Jack Thompson.

David Klingler

Ryan Leaf.

Andre Ware.

Rick Mirer.

 

...to name a few. :D

185322[/snapback]

 

who-dey

 

;)

Posted
  stuckincincy said:
Todd Marinovich.

Akili Smith.

Jack Thompson.

David Klingler

Ryan Leaf.

Andre Ware.

Rick Mirer.

 

...to name a few. :D

185322[/snapback]

Hey, If any of those QB's played for the pats the last few years, they too would be heralded among the greatest ever.

Posted
  rtconner said:
Hey, If any of those QB's played for the pats the last few years, they too would be heralded among the greatest ever.

185396[/snapback]

Dude, pass whatever it is you're on. That's some good sh--.

Posted
  stuckincincy said:
Todd Marinovich.

Akili Smith.

Jack Thompson.

David Klingler

Ryan Leaf.

Andre Ware.

Rick Mirer.

 

...to name a few. :D

185322[/snapback]

 

Sh_t the list of assclowns from the 2nd round on is 10x as long!

Posted
  JP-era said:
Sh_t the list of assclowns from the 2nd round on is 10x as long!

185478[/snapback]

 

Prove it.

 

By the way...was your point that Bledsoe sucks because he's a 1st round pick, or that he's great because he's a 1st round pick?

Posted
  DC Tom said:
Prove it.

 

By the way...was your point that Bledsoe sucks because he's a 1st round pick, or that he's great because he's a 1st round pick?

185486[/snapback]

Let's first determine whether an effort was made to actually MAKE a point before we try to decipher what it was.

Posted
  JP-era said:
Sh_t the list of assclowns from the 2nd round on is 10x as long!

185478[/snapback]

 

Fo shizzle. And the list from the third round on is 100x as long and for the fourth is 1000x as long. Man you should see that list when we get up to the seventh round.

Posted
  DC Tom said:
Prove it.

 

By the way...was your point that Bledsoe sucks because he's a 1st round pick, or that he's great because he's a 1st round pick?

185486[/snapback]

 

 

Are you serious? Prove it? I have already done this with one draft alone in the past. It literally is like 10x the number of QB's that end up being fodder from the 2nd round on versus 1st round QB's. It roughly about 1/2 of the 1st round QB's are very good or great. It more like 1/10th from the rest of the rounds.

 

For every Manning there is 1 leaf

 

For every Brady there is 10 Rob Johnsons

Posted
  boomerjamhead said:
Fo shizzle.  And the list from the third round on is 100x as long and for the fourth is 1000x as long.  Man you should see that list when we get up to the seventh round.

185498[/snapback]

 

 

Absoluetly an exponential decay when plotting good QB's versus round taken! FAR from linear!

Posted
  JP-era said:
Are you serious? Prove it? I have already done this with one draft alone in the past. It literally is like 10x the number of QB's that end up being fodder from the 2nd round on versus 1st round QB's. It roughly about 1/2 of the 1st round QB's are very good or great. It more like 1/10th from the rest of the rounds.

 

For every Manning there is 1 leaf

 

For every Brady there is 10 Rob Johnsons

185501[/snapback]

 

Rob Johnson was drafted earlier than Brady. So is your point now that higher-picked quarterbacks are less likely to be successful than lower-round ones? :D

Posted
  JP-era said:
Absoluetly an exponential decay when plotting good QB's versus round taken! FAR from linear!

185506[/snapback]

 

Prove it. I want to see your exponential least-squares fit to the data...

×
×
  • Create New...