Canadian Bills Fan Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 After VY signing, is there any position that the Bills really need to address? For the first time in a long while, I cant think of one!
BuffaloBillsSD Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Wide receiver but this has been a great off season regardless.
Maddog69 Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 I think we should still be looking for an upgrade at #2 WR and at OLB
mrpunchy Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that guy right there hit it^^^^^^^^^^^^^
mrags Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 I think we think there is a need at WR and LB but I'm not sure Nix, Chan, and Wanny think the same. I'm thinking they like Jones, Easley, and Graham for fighting it out as a #2 on the roster. Hoping of course that Easley is 100%. I also think they are comfortable with who they have at fhe ILB and OLB spots. I would say they might want to add some more depth but you can't pick up all those positions in 1 offseason.
cjbills69 Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Would still like a big bodied fast reciever, but this has been an exciting offseason.
MattM Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 I think we should still be looking for an upgrade at #2 WR and at OLB Add these two plus a back up TE and we have a winner....
NoSaint Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Depends on your goal. I'd say wr2 would need some help. LT is still a question (like cordy but hasnt played a snap) Otherwise nothing that the guy doesn't belong on the field. Fitz is officially my biggest concern this season. There's a pretty good team around him. Barring something crazy, it should all move based on what he does.
montanafan Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Buddy Nix did a great job of filling needs this off season. Key to the whole offseason was resigning Johnson, Fred, Chandler, etc, so we didn't have to use draft choices to plug those holes. But I think they are still looking to upgrade and add depth to linebacker and tight end.
RyanC883 Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Another WR who is durable would be nice. Perhaps they see what they have in camp and if they don't see a #2 make a trade to get Wayne or someone like that.
The Big Cat Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 I'm curious as to how LB could be considered a need... But yes, WR2 is definitely our weak spot.
Toshiero Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 After VY signing, is there any position that the Bills really need to address? For the first time in a long while, I cant think of one! STARTING QB is still weak.
Mark Vader Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Add these two plus a back up TE and we have a winner.... I concur. If Scott Chandler goes down, who fills in for him? #2 WR is still a big issue as well. Having said that, I love what the Bills have done this offseason.
NoSaint Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) I'm curious as to how LB could be considered a need... But yes, WR2 is definitely our weak spot. Are you implying that Morrison and shep play out positive, or midrounders overachieve? Until someone shows otherwise, we don't have 3 proven guys yet, yet alone proven depth Edited May 11, 2012 by NoSaint
The Wiz Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) Punter for sure. We need a decent backup like we have for kicker. /sarcasm off Edited May 11, 2012 by The Wiz
BiggieScooby Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Wide receiver is Easley or Jones a number 2? This is my main concern as our WRs looked progressively worse as the '11 season wore on. Tightend Chandler and who else?
HumbleAndHungry Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) Quarterback Edited May 11, 2012 by Finkle Is Einhorn
The Big Cat Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) Are you implying that Morrison and shep play out positive, or midrounders overachieve? Until someone shows otherwise, we don't have 3 proven guys yet, yet alone proven depth We ran half our plays out of the Nickel last year (2 LB's). We can expect much of the same this year. That leaves the other half of our plays split between 3, 1 and 0 LB formations. Given how little we'll trot 3 LB's out there, I'm not at all concerned with how the third guy performs. And since I do have confidence in the first two--whoever they may be--I'm not at all concerned about LB, especially given the attention our front four will receive demand this year. At this point, a stud OLB is a luxury, not a need. Considering we'll need at least one other WR out there on practically every offensive play (save for heavy formations, goal line formations and the occasional wild cat), I'd say WR2 crushes OLB in terms of need. Edited May 11, 2012 by The Big Cat
Recommended Posts