DC Tom Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Oh, please. Rasmussen is one of THE most accurate pollsters around. It's not like its PPP or WSJ/ABC or Fox. We understand you don't like their results, but to dismiss a poll because it's Rasmussen is ridiculous. Wait...you mean to say that...Fox...is inaccurate????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Wait...you mean to say that...Fox...is inaccurate????? I think polling has value. The only polls I don't quickly dismiss are Rasmussen, Quinnipiac, Pew and Gallup. If it weren't for DailyKos, PPP wouldn't exist. The rest are just self-serving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I think polling has value. The only polls I don't quickly dismiss are Rasmussen, Quinnipiac, Pew and Gallup. If it weren't for DailyKos, PPP wouldn't exist. The rest are just self-serving. Speaking of MSNBC. check out this interview. What a B word!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://freebeacon.com/watch-tamron-hall-go-nuts/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I stressed it in a thread about a month ago and I will again; Media polls today are not done to report, but rather to influence In the (distance) past the object was to discover what respondents think, to describe and reflect public opinion. Nowadays, the media (both print and networks) deliberately release specific polls, at specific times to influence and change what the public sees as important. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I think polling has value. The only polls I don't quickly dismiss are Rasmussen, Quinnipiac, Pew and Gallup. If it weren't for DailyKos, PPP wouldn't exist. The rest are just self-serving. But...Fox???...INACCURATE????? You mean, all those missing white women weren't really missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 But...Fox???...INACCURATE????? You mean, all those missing white women weren't really missing? Nope. They were all just hiding in Greta Van Susteren's basement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Speaking of MSNBC. check out this interview. What a B word!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://freebeacon.com/watch-tamron-hall-go-nuts/ Dammit, that link got my hopes up. At first glance I thought it was about free bacon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Nope. They were all just hiding in Greta Van Susteren's basement. Is that why Nancy Grace couldn't find them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Is that why Nancy Grace couldn't find them? If Nancy Grace were looking for you, you'd want to stay missing too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 If Nancy Grace were looking for you, you'd want to stay missing too She never checks under the couch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 She never checks under the couch. I suspect neither do most of her viewers. If they looked under the couch they'd find the remote and change the channel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Is that why Nancy Grace couldn't find them? Nancy Grace couldn't find them because they were below her foopa. !@#$, I hate that !@#$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 http://realclearpolitics.com/ It's May Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Nope. They were all just hiding in Greta Van Susteren's basement. Yeah. "Hiding." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Yeah. "Hiding." It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whateverdude Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 I use to smoke and eat faggots and then beat myself with a faggot for being such a faggot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 I use to smoke and eat faggots and then beat myself with a faggot for being such a faggot. I done some crazy stuff in college dude, but nothing like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim in Anchorage Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 http://www.nydailyne...ticle-1.1076395 Nice! The Democrats better start sending political hacks into the bathhouses to grouse out more faggots and unemployed illegal alien college grads with their "women's studies" degrees or they are going no where with Barry. Thats too good. I imagine Lybob,fatty and birdog all needed smelling salts after reading that. Faggots? You must be over 40. Young people love that lifestyle Right JA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 I wonder how many are undecideds? Because historically, those almost always go against the incumbent. And once he nominates Rubio... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 I done some crazy stuff in college dude, but nothing like that I wore sweater vests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts