MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 (edited) Yeah, that's what I said. I wasn't telling you that you're grievously misinformed, I was promoting an anarchic market. Shame on me for arguing with a wikiwarrior who obviously knows what I think better than I do. Which is even stupider than saying they're the same thing. Oh...hey, it's John Dellapelle. I remember him. He really is an idiot. Was years ago. Still is. Great, now I can just copy and paste all my responses from back then. Save me a boatload of time. you do realize there are multiple definitions of fascism, what we are talking about here is soft-fascism... - ron paul talks about it here with tim russert. the way im using it refers to the ww2- italian style fascism where state and corporate america are working together... seriously man, you mad bro? relax... Edited May 8, 2012 by MARCELL DAREUS POWER
KD in CA Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 This pos is really aging delegates for some reason, what the heck will this wacko do at the convention with his mob of moronic followers? He wants retards like you to learn how to use your brain. Lost cause, isn't it?
boyst Posted May 8, 2012 Posted May 8, 2012 This is a fun thread. Thank you shoutbox guy who mentioned it.
Bigfatbillsfan Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 I'll tell you what he wants! What he really, really wants! Yeah, tell me what he wants! What he really, really wants!
LeviF Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Oh...hey, it's John Dellapelle. I remember him. He really is an idiot. Was years ago. Still is. Great, now I can just copy and paste all my responses from back then. Save me a boatload of time. John Dellapelle had quite a different crusade going on, if I remember correctly.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 He wants retards like you to learn how to use your brain. Lost cause, isn't it? Ha ha, insult Ron Paul and the hard core ignoramuses come out at you. It's like being insulted by a bag of trash, oh well...
DC Tom Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 you do realize there are multiple definitions of fascism, what we are talking about here is soft-fascism... youtube.com/watch?v=xlxJvWfsawY - ron paul talks about it here with tim russert. the way im using it refers to the ww2- italian style fascism where state and corporate america are working together... seriously man, you mad bro? relax... No, there's pretty much only one definition of fascism. That's why it can be described simply by saying "fascism". What you mean to say (and yes, I can read your mind. Given that it's not a tough read, with lots of pictures and no polysyllabic words, you shouldn't be surprised) is that fascism does not necessarily exist on its own, but can coexist with other belief system, be them expansionalist, racist, isolationist, syndicalist...even monarchist (Spain). It can be corporatist (though that usually conflicts with the nationalist elements of fascist philosophy that treat the national populous as a whole, eschew class warfare, and typically revere the peasantry as the backbone of the nation)...but that doesn't make corporatism fascist. THAT is like saying you're a Darius fan and an idiot, therefore all idiots are Darius fans. It doesn't work that way. You !@#$ing moron.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 This is a fun thread. Thank you shoutbox guy who mentioned it. Don't tell Doc!
3rdnlng Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 No, there's pretty much only one definition of fascism. That's why it can be described simply by saying "fascism". What you mean to say (and yes, I can read your mind. Given that it's not a tough read, with lots of pictures and no polysyllabic words, you shouldn't be surprised) is that fascism does not necessarily exist on its own, but can coexist with other belief system, be them expansionalist, racist, isolationist, syndicalist...even monarchist (Spain). It can be corporatist (though that usually conflicts with the nationalist elements of fascist philosophy that treat the national populous as a whole, eschew class warfare, and typically revere the peasantry as the backbone of the nation)...but that doesn't make corporatism fascist. THAT is like saying you're a Darius fan and an idiot, therefore all idiots are Darius fans. It doesn't work that way. You !@#$ing moron. Respect the man, dammit!
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 No, there's pretty much only one definition of fascism. That's why it can be described simply by saying "fascism". What you mean to say (and yes, I can read your mind. Given that it's not a tough read, with lots of pictures and no polysyllabic words, you shouldn't be surprised) is that fascism does not necessarily exist on its own, but can coexist with other belief system, be them expansionalist, racist, isolationist, syndicalist...even monarchist (Spain). It can be corporatist (though that usually conflicts with the nationalist elements of fascist philosophy that treat the national populous as a whole, eschew class warfare, and typically revere the peasantry as the backbone of the nation)...but that doesn't make corporatism fascist. THAT is like saying you're a Darius fan and an idiot, therefore all idiots are Darius fans. It doesn't work that way. You !@#$ing moron. Stupid! So stupid. But what do you expect from someone who is so ignorant of history SMH Gosh, historical ignorance is so sad,
....lybob Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Ron Paul- more rouge than Palin could ever dream of being- anyone who both the left and the right try marginalize can't be all bad.
DC Tom Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Stupid! So stupid. But what do you expect from someone who is so ignorant of history SMH Gosh, historical ignorance is so sad, Well then, Davey, why don't you tell the class the myriad different definitions of "fascism"? That ought to be good coming from someone who couldn't find his own ass with both hands and a map of his ass.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 Well then, Davey, why don't you tell the class the myriad different definitions of "fascism"? That ought to be good coming from someone who couldn't find his own ass with both hands and a map of his ass. So Franco's fascism was the same as Hitler's? Please..... Read some history chum Hell, Hitler's fascism wasn't even the same in 1930 as it was in 1940. but you wouldn't know about that
ieatcrayonz Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 I'm liking it. Sure would teach those arrogant cyclists to share the !@#$ing road. Awesome. McDonald's does test markets. So does Pepsi, M & M Mars and every other consumer product. Technology companies do betas. Maybe the can have a beta test market where we still have to obey all traffic rules except we can hit anyone in the spandex mafia we want. There should be one rule still: If one of them is hurt after being hit the driver either has to call 911 or pop it in reverse and finish the job. Driver's call. You can't just drive away. If this works out well, and I don't see how this can fail, we get rid of another rule and another until the roads are deregulated.
LeviF Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 is that fascism does not necessarily exist on its own, but can coexist with other belief system, be them expansionalist, racist, isolationist, syndicalist...even monarchist (Spain). You !@#$ing moron. So Franco's fascism was the same as Hitler's? Please..... Read some history chum Hell, Hitler's fascism wasn't even the same in 1930 as it was in 1940. but you wouldn't know about that You really are !@#$ing retarded.
ieatcrayonz Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Well then, Davey, why don't you tell the class the myriad different definitions of "fascism"? That ought to be good coming from someone who couldn't find his own ass with both hands and a map of his ass. OK now Google has gone too far.
dayman Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Ron Paul- more rouge than Palin could ever dream of being- anyone who both the left and the right try marginalize can't be all bad. LOL ya. I still laugh at Palin thinking she's rogue. Only thing she went Rogue on was McCain.
DC Tom Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 So Franco's fascism was the same as Hitler's? Please..... Read some history chum Hell, Hitler's fascism wasn't even the same in 1930 as it was in 1940. but you wouldn't know about that Did you even read my post above? Or just blindly post bull **** in response? Go back and read it, everything that explains why you're a complete tool is already posted there.
Dave_In_Norfolk Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 (edited) Did you even read my post above? Or just blindly post bull **** in response? Go back and read it, everything that explains why you're a complete tool is already posted there. Don't need to, you are the one claiming there is only one definition of fascism, which I a pretty stupid thing to say, but you also think Obama is an extremists, so ya, stupid Edited May 9, 2012 by Dave_In_Norfolk
Recommended Posts