\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 http://www.goldendalesentinel.com/story/2012/05/02/news/school-worker-fired-arrested-on-sex-charges/648.html
KD in CA Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 abso-f***ing-lutely!!!! +1,000,000 YEEEEEEEEEEP! Did I click on the wrong link or did you guys forget to look at her face? I mean, I could see a "well, maybe if I was drunk" response, but I'm having a hard time understanding the level of enthusiasm here.
DC Tom Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 Did I click on the wrong link or did you guys forget to look at her face? I mean, I could see a "well, maybe if I was drunk" response, but I'm having a hard time understanding the level of enthusiasm here. My first thought was that she looked cute, except the glasses looked a little odd...oh, wait, those are bags and rings under her eyes... I think she's a bit better than "maybe, if I was drunk," but only a virgin is going to post "+1,000,000."
The Poojer Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 glasses????? maybe you need your glasses checked....she isn't wearing glasses...unless there is a link i missed...i went with the picture in the article of her in a maroon washington state shirt My first thought was that she looked cute, except the glasses looked a little odd...oh, wait, those are bags and rings under her eyes... I think she's a bit better than "maybe, if I was drunk," but only a virgin is going to post "+1,000,000."
Philly McButterpants Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 (edited) My first thought was that she looked cute, except the glasses looked a little odd...oh, wait, those are bags and rings under her eyes... I think she's a bit better than "maybe, if I was drunk," but only a virgin is going to post "+1,000,000." Damn . .my secret is out. I'm the 47 year old virgin with two "miracle" children. Perhaps it's an age perspective . . . plus she's the X-country and track coach. Edited May 3, 2012 by Fatty McButterpants
erynthered Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 (edited) glasses????? maybe you need your glasses checked....she isn't wearing glasses...unless there is a link i missed...i went with the picture in the article of her in a maroon washington state shirt Maybe you need glasses. Here's what Tom said: My first thought was that she looked cute, except the glasses looked a little odd...oh, wait, those are bags and rings under her eyes... Edited May 3, 2012 by erynthered
Just Jack Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 Heid says that when he learned of the allegations, April 16, the district immediately contacted Canfield Insurance Group, the district’s insurance provider, to begin an investigation. Powers’s position was terminated after the investigation was complete, and Heid informed Goldendale Police Department (GPD) of their findings. Huh?
The Poojer Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 nah...not a need for glasses(i already have them), more about paying atten....ding...ooooh shiny object.... Maybe you need glasses. Here's what Tom said: My first thought was that she looked cute, except the glasses looked a little odd...oh, wait, those are bags and rings under her eyes...
erynthered Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 Heid says that when he learned of the allegations, April 16, the district immediately contacted Canfield Insurance Group, the district's insurance provider, to begin an investigation. Powers's position was terminated after the investigation was complete, and Heid informed Goldendale Police Department (GPD) of their findings. Huh? Could be they have a contract with the schoold district wrt liability ins, etc. Kind of a CYA thingy amybe. Just a guess.........
C.Biscuit97 Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 Eh. I'm a guy so I probably would but I won't brag about it. And if some punk kid is lying, do the accused get their life unruined? I love how newspapers jsut run with a 16 yo's story.
DrDawkinstein Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 Did I click on the wrong link or did you guys forget to look at her face? I mean, I could see a "well, maybe if I was drunk" response, but I'm having a hard time understanding the level of enthusiasm here. I think we're factoring in her age. For a 44 year old, she's decent. If I'm 16 and she approaches me in the hall, it's the best day of school ever.
KD in CA Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 I think we're factoring in her age. For a 44 year old, she's decent. If I'm 16 and she approaches me in the hall, it's the best day of school ever. True enough, but "abso-f***ing-lutely!!!!" and "+1000000" should be for Kate Upton, not 'decent for her mid-40s'. In contrast, Captain Hindsight and mead responded in what I would consider a more appropriate manner. I'd just like like us to have some standards on these things. I can't be the only one who read the reviews and was then disappointed after clicking the link.
The Poojer Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 F*** standards.... :-) True enough, but "abso-f***ing-lutely!!!!" and "+1000000" should be for Kate Upton, not 'decent for her mid-40s'. In contrast, Captain Hindsight and mead responded in what I would consider a more appropriate manner. I'd just like like us to have some standards on these things. I can't be the only one who read the reviews and was then disappointed after clicking the link.
Fan in San Diego Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 They are going to help that young man get thru it.
DrDawkinstein Posted May 3, 2012 Posted May 3, 2012 True enough, but "abso-f***ing-lutely!!!!" and "+1000000" should be for Kate Upton, not 'decent for her mid-40s'. In contrast, Captain Hindsight and mead responded in what I would consider a more appropriate manner. I'd just like like us to have some standards on these things. I can't be the only one who read the reviews and was then disappointed after clicking the link. What are these "standards" you speak of?
Recommended Posts