Doc Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 I wonder, too, how honest these "studies" are. Are they actually comparing across the same or similar jobs, or are they comparing female college interns to male staffers with 25 years experience? What, you expect some truthiness in your electioneering? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 (edited) Wicked little ad from Susan B. Anthony List (a conservative political action committee) about the War on Women. Edited May 25, 2012 by LABillzFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 http://www.examiner.com/article/has-debbie-wasserman-schultz-worn-out-her-welcome#print Damn those hateful Republicans! On a side note: meh, I've woken up the next day to worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 On a side note: meh, I've woken up the next day to worse And had to gnaw your arm off to get free, I suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 And had to gnaw your arm off to get free, I suspect. I never understood this. Why on earth would you want to gnaw off your arm to get away when you can just kill them and leave intact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Link? Ask, and ye shall receive. I have an idea. Let's start a porn mag where we do this type of thing with the women of the left. I wonder what Michelle O. looks like with a rooster in her mouth and another in her ass. Just sayin'. That'd be cool. Fargin' perverts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 Ask, and ye shall receive. I have an idea. Let's start a porn mag where we do this type of thing with the women of the left. I wonder what Michelle O. looks like with a rooster in her mouth and another in her ass. Just sayin'. That'd be cool. Fargin' perverts. Sandra Fluke is a "slut' and the world is outraged. Sarah Palin is a C**t and "crickets". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Sandra Fluke is a "slut' and the world is outraged. Sarah Palin is a C**t and "crickets". My link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 My link We know that Sandra likes "the girls", what did you expect her to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 We know that Sandra likes "the girls", what did you expect her to say? You know, you keep bringing up the whole "Sandra likes the girls" thing and I really wish you'd stop. It has no value, no point to it, and worst of all, it makes you sound like a liberal...harping on some stupid point that no one cares about. They lost the "war on women." Let it go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 You know, you keep bringing up the whole "Sandra likes the girls" thing and I really wish you'd stop. It has no value, no point to it, and worst of all, it makes you sound like a liberal...harping on some stupid point that no one cares about. They lost the "war on women." Let it go. If she truly is a lesbian, and thus in no danger of accidentally getting pregnant, it makes her argument for free birth control disingenuous. To go along with the stupidity that surrounds the "well, I can't expect my lover to wear a condom, which unlike the pill is cheap and helps prevent against STD's, because I'm a weak woman. So gimme free birth control!" subtext. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 If she truly is a lesbian, and thus in no danger of accidentally getting pregnant, it makes her argument for free birth control disingenuous. Nobody cares if her argument is disingenuous because nobody cares about Sandra Fluke any more. She's Levi Johnston wrapped in Cindy Sheenan stuffed in Meghan McCain. The left did what they could to make the war on women a big issue. They lost the moment they insisted that being a mother who raised five kids while battling MS is the equivalent of having never worked a day in their life. There is no reason to bring up Fluke, her argument, or her sexual orientation because it is a waste of time, and if you're going to waste your time on something, you can find better things to waste it on than accusing a woman of being a lesbian. It's nothing personal. But if you truly believe this election is critical, pick a battle that needs fighting, not one that makes you look stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Nobody cares if her argument is disingenuous because nobody cares about Sandra Fluke any more. She's Levi Johnston wrapped in Cindy Sheenan stuffed in Meghan McCain. This metaphor is brought to you by Ed Gein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 You know, you keep bringing up the whole "Sandra likes the girls" thing and I really wish you'd stop. It has no value, no point to it, and worst of all, it makes you sound like a liberal...harping on some stupid point that no one cares about. They lost the "war on women." Let it go. Go back to post 66 and read from there on, including the links, and you'll understand that you've taken my comments out of context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 I wonder, too, how honest these "studies" are. Are they actually comparing across the same or similar jobs, or are they comparing female college interns to male staffers with 25 years experience? Any study that doesn't include a global adjustment for the very real biological fact that women have the kids, and spend more time at home as a result, is retarded before it even starts. Why is this so difficult to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 2, 2012 Author Share Posted June 2, 2012 http://www.aei.org/article/politics-and-public-opinion/elections/rattled-obama-team-making-miscues/ Rattled Obama team making miscues Michael Barone | Washington Examiner May 16, 2012 Email Article Rattled Obama team making miscuesMichael Barone | Washington Examiner May 16, 2012 Your Name Friend's Email Address(es) Separate multiple email addresses with commas. Message Characters left: 250SEND EMAIL Getty Images President Obama poses for photographs with the Major League Soccer champions Los Angeles Galaxy, including mid-fielders Landon Donovan and David Beckham in the East Room of the White House on May 15, 2012. Article Highlights •In matchups against Mitt Romney, the president is leading by only 47 to 45% Tweet This •Most voters see the president, on the issue of same-sex marriage, as opportunistic rather than sincere Tweet This •26% of voters are less likely to vote Obama because of same-sex marriage issue, 2x the 13% who are more likely to do so Tweet This Is it panic time at Obama headquarters in Chicago? You might get that impression from watching events -- and the polls -- over the past few weeks. In matchups against Mitt Romney, the president is leading by only 47 to 45 percent in the Realclearpolitics.com average of recent polls. A CBS/New York Times panel-back poll, in which interviewers call back respondents to a previous survey, showed Romney leading 46 to 43 percent -- and leading among women. That's despite the Democrats' charge that Republicans are waging a "war on women" by opposing requirements that all health insurance policies provide free contraceptives. Evidently, that's not the only issue on the minds of American women. Or consider the clumsiness of Obama's announcement a week ago that after "evolving," he is now in favor of same-sex marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Any study that doesn't include a global adjustment for the very real biological fact that women have the kids, and spend more time at home as a result, is retarded before it even starts. Why is this so difficult to understand? This is what I don't understand about these studies. Part of what I do is recruit doctors. I can't tell you the number of female physicians that I placed into excellent paying positions (obviously paying as much as for a male - sometimes more but don't tell Equal Opportunity) who then almost immediately start having kids and then want to go part time. So, obviously they are going to be making less money. And, almost every single one of the girls I went to college with started out doing great in their careers and then turned into full time moms, and now at best just kind of dabble in some part time work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 This is what I don't understand about these studies. Part of what I do is recruit doctors. I can't tell you the number of female physicians that I placed into excellent paying positions (obviously paying as much as for a male - sometimes more but don't tell Equal Opportunity) who then almost immediately start having kids and then want to go part time. So, obviously they are going to be making less money. And, almost every single one of the girls I went to college with started out doing great in their careers and then turned into full time moms, and now at best just kind of dabble in some part time work. Come on, it's the lib philosophy: more pay for less/no work. And for those who work just as much as their male counterparts and are underpaid, there's a thing called asking for/demanding more money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 I know some of you listen to Adam Carolla. A week or two ago, one of Alison's news stories was about how the % of female bank robbers has gone way up. Adam quickly said "But, they are only getting 73% of the money from the bank, right?" Alison was dying laughing, and so was I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 The war on women has spread overseas. Just look at the income disparity here, camels for Obama but only hens for Hillary http://news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-offshoot-offers-camels-obamas-head-hens-165924543--abc-news-topstories.html My next question is, is that even a fair wage or are they stealing from labor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts