Toshiero Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Or however you spell his name. Anyway that means the top LT could drop to us at #10 or if we want to move up for him, it won't be as far meaning not costing as much.
jjmac Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Rumor has it Kalil could slide all the way to #10 and we would not have to trade up at all.
mrags Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 IMO this is just media throwing s#!t at a wall and trying to get it to stick. They simply have no idea and want to say they were the first to report it. I'll say it now, The Browns are being reported to take Richardson with the 4th pick. Wooohooo! First. I want a job at ESPN now because I knew it. It's obvious. Who cares.
NewEra Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 It looks as if jax and Carolina would be willing to trade down (from what I've heard). If kalil falls to jax or even Carolina, I'd expect another team to trade up ahead of the bills to snag kalil. I think we have to trade up in order to get him. Jmo.
BB2004 Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 It looks as if jax and Carolina would be willing to trade down (from what I've heard). If kalil falls to jax or even Carolina, I'd expect another team to trade up ahead of the bills to snag kalil. I think we have to trade up in order to get him. Jmo. I definitely agree. In fact I think I think if Morris C. is drafted by the Vikings the Bucs would take him at #5. Kalil would be my first choice for sure, it just doesn't seem likely the Bills have any chance of drafting him.
nucci Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 IMO this is just media throwing s#!t at a wall and trying to get it to stick. They simply have no idea and want to say they were the first to report it. I'll say it now, The Browns are being reported to take Richardson with the 4th pick. Wooohooo! First. I want a job at ESPN now because I knew it. It's obvious. Who cares. We know this but this is a message board about the Bills and the draft is tonight. This is what we do..speculate, guess and have fun. Well, most of us.
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 I will say that after looking at some of the Brown's journalists, they have talked about trading down. If the Vikes take Claiborne, it is still cheaper for us.
HornyToad Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Rumor has it Kalil could slide all the way to #10 and we would not have to trade up at all. ============================================================================================= NEVER HAPPEN He may fall but not that much. If the Vikings don't take him he would still get drafted before pick 10. He's too good to fall all the way to 10.
jjmac Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 (edited) ============================================================================================= NEVER HAPPEN He may fall but not that much. If the Vikings don't take him he would still get drafted before pick 10. He's too good to fall all the way to 10. And that's just fine with me, because I don't want the Bills to draft him. Edited April 26, 2012 by jjmac
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Well we know Cleveland and Miami do not need a LT. So out of Tampa, St Louis, Jax, and Carolina, who needs a LT? He will be the best player on the board. So if any of those teams need one, why would they trade w Buffalo?
kickedface Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 i've been saying this for a while. unless the vikings trade down. i don't think a lt will be taken until 10 maybe not even then. i could still see the bills go after floyd.
ajzepp Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 The fact that we keep hearing that this guy or that guy may slide all the way to #10 is just further evidence that we should forget any notion of moving upward and just stay put where we are. The draft will fall to us and there will be a difference maker there for the taking.
Doc Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Well we know Cleveland and Miami do not need a LT. So out of Tampa, St Louis, Jax, and Carolina, who needs a LT? He will be the best player on the board. So if any of those teams need one, why would they trade w Buffalo? None of them need a LT. Tampa has Penn, STL has Saffold (he had a promising rookie season but was hurt last year, and they have a ton of other needs), Jax has Monroe, and Carolina has Gross. With the exception of Saffold, who just finished his 2nd year in the NFL, they're all well-paid and their teams won't be paying top-10 money to have Kalil play RT. If he gets by the Vikes, I see him dropping and some team trading up to get him.
Mr. WEO Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Well we know Cleveland and Miami do not need a LT. And yet, again, both are picking in the top 10....
San Jose Bills Fan Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 And that's just fine with me, because I don't want the Bills to draft him. Let me get this straight… if Kalil fell to our pick at #10, you still wouldn't want the Bills to draft him?
roccitybillsfan Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 If Kalil drops to 10, you have to draft him. I'd even say if he falls to 7, we trade up. He seems(to me at least) to be a franchise LT. I have been all for Floyd, but if Kalil, Blackmon or Claiborne drop to the Bills, Floyd should not be a Buffalo Bill(unless Floyd unexplicably falls to round 2...but that absolutely will not happen).
Malazan Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 If Kalil drops to 10, you have to draft him. I'd even say if he falls to 7, we trade up. You don't trade up for him. There are very, very, very few players that you should trade 'up' for...
EastRochBillsfan Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Let me get this straight… if Kalil fell to our pick at #10, you still wouldn't want the Bills to draft him? What San Jose', you been hittin the pharmacy again?? I'm pretty sure you got it right there!
rstencel Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 (edited) And yet, again, both are picking in the top 10.... So if colts dont make playoffs and have high pick guess means luck was a flop too. They must have really flopped with Manning too, cause they didnt win at all with him till they drafted a line infront of him, and another reciever for him. Fact that they need a rt and rg bad has something to do with that. Need 5 good players on a line. We have 2 holes on line, and filling lt, allows rt to be filled as well. Course if no hurry to get good, can continue drafting lower and waiting for them to develope, personally not excited about waiting several more years. Edited April 26, 2012 by rstencel
frogger Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 He could be this years mckelvin, in the sense we wanted him, but never thought he'd fall to us. Now he's our starting cb, for better or worse.
Recommended Posts