Rubes Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 ...when Goodell steps to the podium, he announces the Bills pick as: 1. Gilmore 2. Barron 3. Kuechly 4. Floyd 5. any LT other than Kalil 6. a trade up for Kalil 7. Tannehill Personally, mine are: 1. Satisfied, but not terribly excited. 2. Satisfied, and a little excited. 3. Pretty happy. 4. Satisfied, and a little excited. 5. Hmm, not too sure, concerned he won't live up to the pick. 6. Not too happy that we gave away picks, but excited to have a really solid OL. 7. I'd !@#$ing flip out. I guess I'm more comfortable with the defensive options at #10 than the offensive options.
BillsGuyInMalta Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore: Content, not overjoyed. I know its a need and Gilmore is a good player for the Bills secondary. 2. Barron: I understand the pick, it makes sense...but I'd still be annoyed. Not the right time for a player like that. 3. Kuechly: Happy. He can cover the TEs just as well as Barron could IMO. 4. Floyd: Surprised, but happy. I dont think he's very high on the Bills board. 5. any LT other than Kalil: Depends. If its Glenn, I'll be content. If its Reiff or Martin, I'll be upset. 6. a trade up for Kalil: VERY happy as long as its just a 1st and 2nd swap. 7. Tannehill: Urge to kill...rising...
bschmoove Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 Kuechly, Kalil, Blackmon or Floyd would make me happy. Anyone else would make me plotz.
Cash Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 ...when Goodell steps to the podium, he announces the Bills pick as: 1. Gilmore 2. Barron 3. Kuechly 4. Floyd 5. any LT other than Kalil 6. a trade up for Kalil 7. Tannehill 1. Okay, not bad, let's hope he's as good as advertised. 2. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU... 3. Alright, that's solid, let's hope he's as good as advertised. 4. Wow, that's surprising. Let's hope Why So Serious knows what he's talking about. Now, to the youtubes! 5. (Assuming no trade down) Wow, didn't see that coming. Hope this means they were sandbagging b/c they didn't want his stock to rise, and not that they panicked or got overruled by Ralph. 6. Nice! What'd we pay? Ugh, that's a lot. Oh well, still psyched to get Kalil. 7. MY MIND IS BLOWN
Maddog69 Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore: Annoyed. Overrated. Over Hyped. Not a stud. We have more important needs 2. Barron: Annoyed. No Thank You to a Safety in the top 10 especially with the guys we already have. 3. Kuechly: Happy. He can cover the TEs just as well as Barron could IMO. 4. Floyd: Surprised and happy. 5. any LT other than Kalil: Perfectly content. Huge are of need and I trust Buddy to pick the right guy. 6. a trade up for Kalil: VERY HAPPY regardless of the cost. This is the move I want most. 7. Tannehill: Excited. If Nix identifies him as worthy of this pick, I would be excited that we have a QB of the future to develop behind Fitz.
bartshan-83 Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore ("Cool, I guess... ") 2. Barron ("Cool, but I'm surprised that wasn't a smokescreen.") 3. Kuechly ("Very cool, I just hope he's not Poz.") 4. Floyd ("Hell yeah! Now keep your nose clean, Mike...") 5. any LT other than Kalil ("Eh...weak.") 6. a trade up for Kalil ("Nice! I can't believe Miami only wanted next year's 7th to switch places!") 7. Tannehill ("We didn't need this...")
Mr. WEO Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 (edited) 1. Mr. Gilmore, meet Mr. McKelvin.... 2. Barron: Jauron must have overruled Buddy again, huh? 3. Keuchly: meh... 4. Floyd: Praise be Allah!! 5. "other LT": grounds for dismissal 6. Trade up Kalil: tempted to say depends on who we pass on to get him, but my thoughts on spending so much on an LT are well known---it just hasn't worked out well for those who have done it over the past 5 years. 7. Tannehill: don't even hve to consider it. can't happen. Edited April 26, 2012 by Mr. WEO
JM57 Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore (Going to be a solid CB in this league. Film rat, weight room junkie, played quality ball against quality competition from Day One on campus) 2. Barron (FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU) 3. Kuechly (Underwhelmed, let's hope he's not Poz 2.0 plus some cover skills) 4. Floyd (Pleasantly surprised, let's hope he can step right in) 5. any LT other than Kalil (At #10 FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU) 6. a trade up for Kalil (Tears of joy) 7. Tannehill (I quit. I seriously quit.)
Cru Jones Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Meh 2. EeeIdontknokay 3. Good 4. Woo! 5. Disappointed 6. Depends on what they give up, but would love to have him. 7. Mother F#cker!!!!!
SRivRoc Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1.happy-we filled a need 2. DAMMIT!!! We have great safeties 3. Kuechly-yesssss....we have a pro bowler now 4. Be happier with Brian quick but Floyd would make me happy too 5. How did he fall to us?!?!?!?! Is there something wrong with him??? 6.what the f*** 7.im gonna be a 49ers fan now, I've lost all hope for this team
jjmac Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 ...when Goodell steps to the podium, he announces the Bills pick as: 1. Gilmore 2. Barron 3. Kuechly 4. Floyd 5. any LT other than Kalil 6. a trade up for Kalil 7. Tannehill Personally, mine are: 1. Satisfied, but not terribly excited. 2. Satisfied, and a little excited. 3. Pretty happy. 4. Satisfied, and a little excited. 5. Hmm, not too sure, concerned he won't live up to the pick. 6. Not too happy that we gave away picks, but excited to have a really solid OL. 7. I'd !@#$ing flip out. I guess I'm more comfortable with the defensive options at #10 than the offensive options. 1. Gilmore-satisfied 2. Barron-satisfied 3. Kuechly-happy 4. Floyd-happy 5. any LT other than Kalil-reach 6. a trade up for Kalil-upset 7. Tannehill-really upset.
ieatcrayonz Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 ...when Goodell steps to the podium, he announces the Bills pick as: 1. Gilmore - Awesome 2. Barron - Good but would remember that we just let an all pro walk and this pick was wasted back then 3. Kuechly - Poz with crappy hair. Hey you asked for my initial thought and that will be it. 4. Floyd - I will wonder where his first Buffalo arrest will take place. Probably Chippewa 5. any LT other than Kalil - Glenn Good....others bad 6. a trade up for Kalil - depends on what they give up but although it would be nice to have him it will be expensive, Probably too expensive 7. Tanlleywhacker - Well, at least we did well in free agency.
BrooklynBills Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore - Worried 2. Barron - Very Happy 3. Kuechly - Pleased 4. Floyd - Worried 5. Other LT - Pissed 6. Kalil - Happy 7. Tannenhill - Cautious Optimism If we pass on Barron or Kuechly to take Floyd or Gilmore or a LT or Tannenhill, I will not be happy.
MRW Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 ...when Goodell steps to the podium, he announces the Bills pick as: 1. Gilmore 2. Barron 3. Kuechly 4. Floyd 5. any LT other than Kalil 6. a trade up for Kalil 7. Tannehill If we got all those guys I'd be stoked!
devldog131 Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore - Eh, not thrilled, but not terribly upset 2. Barron - Upset. Waste of a pick as we absolutely do NOT need to spend a high first rounder on a safety. I don't think we need to worry about safety at all, imho. 3. Kuechly - Happy. Second choice. 4. Floyd - Ecstatic. Great pick and effectively eliminates one of the top needs while still picking a player who deserves to be picked at 10. 5. any LT other than Kalil - bull$#!t! 6. a trade up for Kalil - Happy. would rather have him fall(would be ecstatic to get him at 10 and keep the picks, but not likely) but getting him by hook or by crook would be a coup. 7. Tannehill - bull$#!t!
HornyToad Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 I would love to trade up Kalil as long as the price wasn't too steep. We have too many needs to give away the farm to get him. The most I would give up would be a number 2 and nothing more. That price is steep enough. I would rather give up a 3rd rounder and McKelvin. The Vikes need DBs maybe they would be dumb enough to bite. LOL I know, McKelvin, probably not but I can dream can't I? LOL
Rico Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 1. Gilmore - Meh 2. Barron - Meh 3. Kuechly - Sharpening the Pitchfork 4. Floyd - Cool 5. Other LT - Depends on who & what else happens the rest of the draft 6. Kalil - Very Cool 7. Tanneyhill - Between Meh & Sharpening the Pitchfork
The Cincinnati Kid Posted April 26, 2012 Posted April 26, 2012 I dont want Tannehill. I don't think they'll take a T other than Kalil and they won't trade up to do it. I guess we'll see. I don't care as long as its not Tannehill, unless they trade his azz for something better!
Recommended Posts